<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NYTimes gets computer security wrong again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cdixon.org/2009/04/08/nytimes-gets-computer-security-wrong-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/04/08/nytimes-gets-computer-security-wrong-again/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 11:02:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous Penguin</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/04/08/nytimes-gets-computer-security-wrong-again/comment-page-1/#comment-5848</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous Penguin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 16:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=152#comment-5848</guid>
		<description>All the techies I know - and it&#039;s a reasonably large though perhaps very skewed sample - use Linux. Although obviously I would agree with your comments regarding relative security of Unix-based systems vs. Windows, why would a real techie want to use something as locked down as a Mac?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the techies I know &#8211; and it&#8217;s a reasonably large though perhaps very skewed sample &#8211; use Linux. Although obviously I would agree with your comments regarding relative security of Unix-based systems vs. Windows, why would a real techie want to use something as locked down as a Mac?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dazhi chen</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/04/08/nytimes-gets-computer-security-wrong-again/comment-page-1/#comment-879</link>
		<dc:creator>dazhi chen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 13:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=152#comment-879</guid>
		<description>hey chris,
according to my coworker who used to be in PR, the reason that even the NYT published such a poor article is because they didn&#039;t read it.  apparently, what PR firms do today is to essentially pre-write articles and send them to the papers magazines - leading many to become disillusioned with mainstream press, and to turn to bloggers instead.  writers are so busy and understaffed that they often just take the pre-written pieces from the PR firms, repackage them, and go to print.  i think, every article about a new product/service was probably fed to the papers by PR firms.  to me, they often read almost like an advert.
dazhi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey chris,<br />
according to my coworker who used to be in PR, the reason that even the NYT published such a poor article is because they didn&#8217;t read it.  apparently, what PR firms do today is to essentially pre-write articles and send them to the papers magazines &#8211; leading many to become disillusioned with mainstream press, and to turn to bloggers instead.  writers are so busy and understaffed that they often just take the pre-written pieces from the PR firms, repackage them, and go to print.  i think, every article about a new product/service was probably fed to the papers by PR firms.  to me, they often read almost like an advert.<br />
dazhi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.120 seconds -->

