<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The problem with tranched VC investments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cdixon.org/2009/08/15/the-problem-with-tranched-vc-investments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/08/15/the-problem-with-tranched-vc-investments/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 00:43:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/08/15/the-problem-with-tranched-vc-investments/comment-page-1/#comment-7182</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 05:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=261#comment-7182</guid>
		<description>I am an engineer&#039;s engineer who joined a vc funded startup without knowing much about how vc operated and how much trouble the startup was in. Investors had thrown out some cofounders and had placed a vc partner as ceo. This vc/ceo one day singled me out and laid me off in a very bad way (he&#039;s known for being dismissive and rude) with no explanation to anyone incl mngmt.
    I am looking for some advice on whether I can do something related to termination terms (layoff vs others). Does someone know any engineer vs vc forum where i could get some feedback from people more familiar with such stuff?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am an engineer&#8217;s engineer who joined a vc funded startup without knowing much about how vc operated and how much trouble the startup was in. Investors had thrown out some cofounders and had placed a vc partner as ceo. This vc/ceo one day singled me out and laid me off in a very bad way (he&#8217;s known for being dismissive and rude) with no explanation to anyone incl mngmt.<br />
    I am looking for some advice on whether I can do something related to termination terms (layoff vs others). Does someone know any engineer vs vc forum where i could get some feedback from people more familiar with such stuff?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finance Geek » Seed investments from big VCs</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/08/15/the-problem-with-tranched-vc-investments/comment-page-1/#comment-4032</link>
		<dc:creator>Finance Geek » Seed investments from big VCs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=261#comment-4032</guid>
		<description>[...] The problem with tranched VC investments (cdixon.org) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The problem with tranched VC investments (cdixon.org) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter Trackbacks for cdixon.org / The problem with tranched VC investments [cdixon.org] on Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/08/15/the-problem-with-tranched-vc-investments/comment-page-1/#comment-1751</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter Trackbacks for cdixon.org / The problem with tranched VC investments [cdixon.org] on Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 03:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=261#comment-1751</guid>
		<description>[...] First Tweet 15 days ago       cdixon chris dixon Highly Influential    the problem with tranched venture capital investments http://www.cdixon.org/?p=261   view retweet [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] First Tweet 15 days ago       cdixon chris dixon Highly Influential    the problem with tranched venture capital investments <a href="http://www.cdixon.org/?p=261" rel="nofollow">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=261</a>   view retweet [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Options on early stage companies &#124; Igniting Startups - nPost</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/08/15/the-problem-with-tranched-vc-investments/comment-page-1/#comment-1584</link>
		<dc:creator>Options on early stage companies &#124; Igniting Startups - nPost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=261#comment-1584</guid>
		<description>[...] The point is with the super high volatility of startups, you can structure the option in almost any way and it’s still like giving someone shares.  (I discuss the problems with tranching in more detail here.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The point is with the super high volatility of startups, you can structure the option in almost any way and it’s still like giving someone shares.  (I discuss the problems with tranching in more detail here.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The problem with tranched VC investments &#124; Igniting Startups - nPost</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/08/15/the-problem-with-tranched-vc-investments/comment-page-1/#comment-1349</link>
		<dc:creator>The problem with tranched VC investments &#124; Igniting Startups - nPost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 17:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=261#comment-1349</guid>
		<description>[...] From cdixon.org [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] From cdixon.org [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Graves</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/08/15/the-problem-with-tranched-vc-investments/comment-page-1/#comment-1294</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Graves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 19:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=261#comment-1294</guid>
		<description>Chris,
I&#039;m continually impressed with your posts. I always learn. Keep it up, I&#039;ll be around.

Subscribing to RSS now.
Cheers,
Ryan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,<br />
I&#8217;m continually impressed with your posts. I always learn. Keep it up, I&#8217;ll be around.</p>
<p>Subscribing to RSS now.<br />
Cheers,<br />
Ryan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Hendricks</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/08/15/the-problem-with-tranched-vc-investments/comment-page-1/#comment-1255</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Hendricks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 18:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=261#comment-1255</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve worked at startups that have been tranched by VCs.  I mistakenly did not pose the questions that Chris advises a prospective employee to ask.  Instead of driving sales and marketing I ended up supporting BOD presentations and coming up with sales projections to satisfy the tranching needs.  And guess what?  We didn&#039;t get the funds that the CEO said were there for the asking, when we needed it.  Never again.  Great post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve worked at startups that have been tranched by VCs.  I mistakenly did not pose the questions that Chris advises a prospective employee to ask.  Instead of driving sales and marketing I ended up supporting BOD presentations and coming up with sales projections to satisfy the tranching needs.  And guess what?  We didn&#8217;t get the funds that the CEO said were there for the asking, when we needed it.  Never again.  Great post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cdixon.org / Options on early stage companies</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/08/15/the-problem-with-tranched-vc-investments/comment-page-1/#comment-1244</link>
		<dc:creator>cdixon.org / Options on early stage companies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 05:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=261#comment-1244</guid>
		<description>[...] The point is with the super high volatility of startups, you can structure the option in almost any way and it&#8217;s still like giving someone shares.  (I discuss the problems with tranching in more detail here.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The point is with the super high volatility of startups, you can structure the option in almost any way and it&#8217;s still like giving someone shares.  (I discuss the problems with tranching in more detail here.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johan Söderberg</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/08/15/the-problem-with-tranched-vc-investments/comment-page-1/#comment-1178</link>
		<dc:creator>Johan Söderberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 13:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=261#comment-1178</guid>
		<description>I agree with bunterberg. I would never give the VC the upper hand like that without getting anything in return. In my opinion it is clearly possible for the entrepreneur to get upside potential in such a deal. For instance if certain goals are beaten the number of shares for the same amount of VC-money will be lower. It is all about how well you negotiate with the VCs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with bunterberg. I would never give the VC the upper hand like that without getting anything in return. In my opinion it is clearly possible for the entrepreneur to get upside potential in such a deal. For instance if certain goals are beaten the number of shares for the same amount of VC-money will be lower. It is all about how well you negotiate with the VCs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bunterberg</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/08/15/the-problem-with-tranched-vc-investments/comment-page-1/#comment-1177</link>
		<dc:creator>bunterberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 09:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=261#comment-1177</guid>
		<description>Found an answer in various blog posts (by Peter Davis) via Fred Wilsons hints. Instead of tranching she would plan this case via two rounds while the investor of the first round agrees upon details (and a higher pre) for the eventually upcoming round. She probably needs a strong standing to close such a deal but if it works out she saves time and shares. 

Anyways, finally it will still be up to the investor to actually do the second round and if not she might have a serious problem to find alternatives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Found an answer in various blog posts (by Peter Davis) via Fred Wilsons hints. Instead of tranching she would plan this case via two rounds while the investor of the first round agrees upon details (and a higher pre) for the eventually upcoming round. She probably needs a strong standing to close such a deal but if it works out she saves time and shares. </p>
<p>Anyways, finally it will still be up to the investor to actually do the second round and if not she might have a serious problem to find alternatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.113 seconds -->
