<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ideal first round funding terms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cdixon.org/2009/08/16/ideal-first-round-funding-terms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/08/16/ideal-first-round-funding-terms/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 12:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: electronic pet door</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/08/16/ideal-first-round-funding-terms/comment-page-3/#comment-10120</link>
		<dc:creator>electronic pet door</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 12:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=271#comment-10120</guid>
		<description>I will feed your RSS after this useful article. Thanks a lot.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will feed your RSS after this useful article. Thanks a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Heikkinen</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/08/16/ideal-first-round-funding-terms/comment-page-3/#comment-10006</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Heikkinen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 04:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=271#comment-10006</guid>
		<description>Just came across your blog for the first time the other day and wanted to say thanks for taking the time to share your experiences and knowledge with the rest of us.  We are just starting the fund raising process and will obviously rely on our current network to make intros where available and relevant, but would love to read your thoughts on how to stand out when &#039;cold mailing&#039; firms you have no connection to - even if that advice is to just avoid those firms.  Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just came across your blog for the first time the other day and wanted to say thanks for taking the time to share your experiences and knowledge with the rest of us.  We are just starting the fund raising process and will obviously rely on our current network to make intros where available and relevant, but would love to read your thoughts on how to stand out when &#39;cold mailing&#39; firms you have no connection to &#8211; even if that advice is to just avoid those firms.  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Picking a Startup Lawyer in NYC &#171; The Metamorphosis</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/08/16/ideal-first-round-funding-terms/comment-page-3/#comment-9754</link>
		<dc:creator>Picking a Startup Lawyer in NYC &#171; The Metamorphosis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 01:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=271#comment-9754</guid>
		<description>[...] Read&#160;Chris Dixon&#160;&amp;&#160;Fred Wilson&#039;s blog posts on how much legal fees should run in first round financing. Answer:&#160;$10k max. Drill this into your head, then drill it into your lawyer&#039;s head. Print out both posts and take them to whatever lawyer you hire. Great negotiating tactic. Hard to argue w Fred Wilson. BONUS: Capture the look on their faces when you bust out the printouts with that &quot;$10k&quot; figure underlined/circled/highlighted. Priceless. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read&#160;Chris Dixon&#160;&amp;&#160;Fred Wilson&#39;s blog posts on how much legal fees should run in first round financing. Answer:&#160;$10k max. Drill this into your head, then drill it into your lawyer&#39;s head. Print out both posts and take them to whatever lawyer you hire. Great negotiating tactic. Hard to argue w Fred Wilson. BONUS: Capture the look on their faces when you bust out the printouts with that &quot;$10k&quot; figure underlined/circled/highlighted. Priceless. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Hecker Lawyer Headlines &#187; Don’t be creative about the wrong things</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/08/16/ideal-first-round-funding-terms/comment-page-3/#comment-7467</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Hecker Lawyer Headlines &#187; Don’t be creative about the wrong things</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=271#comment-7467</guid>
		<description>[...] 4 year vesting with a 1 year cliff; yes founders should have vesting; yes your deal terms should be plain vanilla. Etc. These things are time tested and you are far more likely to screw things up than create value [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 4 year vesting with a 1 year cliff; yes founders should have vesting; yes your deal terms should be plain vanilla. Etc. These things are time tested and you are far more likely to screw things up than create value [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don&#8217;t be innovative about the wrong things cdixon.org &#8211; chris dixon&#39;s blog</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/08/16/ideal-first-round-funding-terms/comment-page-3/#comment-6980</link>
		<dc:creator>Don&#8217;t be innovative about the wrong things cdixon.org &#8211; chris dixon&#39;s blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=271#comment-6980</guid>
		<description>[...] 4 year vesting with a 1 year cliff; yes founders should have vesting; yes your deal terms should be plain vanilla. Etc. These things are time tested and you are far more likely to screw things up than create value [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 4 year vesting with a 1 year cliff; yes founders should have vesting; yes your deal terms should be plain vanilla. Etc. These things are time tested and you are far more likely to screw things up than create value [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2startups</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/08/16/ideal-first-round-funding-terms/comment-page-3/#comment-5586</link>
		<dc:creator>2startups</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 11:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=271#comment-5586</guid>
		<description>It is fine for VCs to ask for subsistence level salary. Do they not take management fees? Why do they share in the upside and not in the downside as far as their LPs are concerned. Innovation does not come from engineers who are forced to count their pennies...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is fine for VCs to ask for subsistence level salary. Do they not take management fees? Why do they share in the upside and not in the downside as far as their LPs are concerned. Innovation does not come from engineers who are forced to count their pennies&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Essel</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/08/16/ideal-first-round-funding-terms/comment-page-3/#comment-4897</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Essel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=271#comment-4897</guid>
		<description>It was fun looking back at a comment I left at the end of August on this 13th popular post Chris. 10/10 for the great advice to those seeking funding and for getting me to reread a couple of key concepts.

The concept I was describing then, has actually been realized (although in a limited way). Woot for progress. It&#039;s evolving in some different ways than I first imagined though, which is pretty groovy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was fun looking back at a comment I left at the end of August on this 13th popular post Chris. 10/10 for the great advice to those seeking funding and for getting me to reread a couple of key concepts.</p>
<p>The concept I was describing then, has actually been realized (although in a limited way). Woot for progress. It&#8217;s evolving in some different ways than I first imagined though, which is pretty groovy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yesdi</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/08/16/ideal-first-round-funding-terms/comment-page-3/#comment-3496</link>
		<dc:creator>Yesdi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=271#comment-3496</guid>
		<description>&quot;I would hope all engineers do an expected value calculation. If they don’t believe the company is exceptional, they shouldn’t join.&quot; 

Which is exactly what happens - most startups are NOT exceptional (by definition), people refuse to join for subsistence salary and the company is forced to pay market rates. 

The only problem is when someone (either the VC or the founder) is deluded enough to persist in their belief that  offering a subsistence salary is what makes the company exceptional, rather than the other way around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I would hope all engineers do an expected value calculation. If they don’t believe the company is exceptional, they shouldn’t join.&#8221; </p>
<p>Which is exactly what happens &#8211; most startups are NOT exceptional (by definition), people refuse to join for subsistence salary and the company is forced to pay market rates. </p>
<p>The only problem is when someone (either the VC or the founder) is deluded enough to persist in their belief that  offering a subsistence salary is what makes the company exceptional, rather than the other way around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ideal first round funding terms — cdixon.org – chris dixon&#8217;s blog &#124; work4real.net</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/08/16/ideal-first-round-funding-terms/comment-page-2/#comment-3067</link>
		<dc:creator>Ideal first round funding terms — cdixon.org – chris dixon&#8217;s blog &#124; work4real.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 22:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=271#comment-3067</guid>
		<description>[...] Show original post here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Show original post here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ganapathy</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/08/16/ideal-first-round-funding-terms/comment-page-2/#comment-2011</link>
		<dc:creator>Ganapathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 16:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=271#comment-2011</guid>
		<description>The Angels should also be subject to drag</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Angels should also be subject to drag</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.155 seconds -->
