It’s the partner, not the firm

A large financial institution with access to virtually all venture capital returns data once did a study that determined that the vast majority of profits at each firm are generated by 1 or 2 partners.  In some cases it’s pretty obvious who these stars are- Mike Moritz at Sequoia, John Doerr at Kleiner, etc.  In many other cases it isn’t unless you are an industry “insider.”  So when someone tells you they just raised money from a top tier firm, a good follow up quesiton is “which partner?” since the non-star partners are probably as good at picking companies as a a tier B firm.

There is a big difference, of course, between being a VC who generates profits and being a VC that an entrepreneur should want to work with.  A star VC might be good at picking companies and winning deals, yet actually be a real jerk who doesn’t help the company at all.  But often star VCs do have better rolodexes, can be greater help raising follow on money, and are more influential within the firm if you need to do a “difficult financing.”

Another thing to understand is that who you are first introduced to within the firm is very important.  Why?   1) if you are intro’d to the wrong guy (and in VC unfortunately it is almost always men), that guy might reject you right away whereas another partner might have found your company interesting.  Once one guy dings you the other partners won’t give you a fair hearing for fear of offending the guy who dinged you.  2) VCs can be internally territorial, so if you are intro’d to one guy and he likes it, he might feel like it’s “his deal” when in fact you’d be better off with another partner (then you are stuck with the “roommate switch” problem if you recall that Seinfeld episode).

From my experience, picking the right partner is very important.  For example, in two companies I seeded, the same top tier VC firm invested in later rounds.  In one case the partner has been super helpful, and in the other case pretty much absent.  As I mentioned above, the partner’s influence within the firm also matters.  A influential partner can, for example, “pound the table” to do a follow on financing when you need it.  What stage the partner is in his career also matters.  Junior partners will typically work harder, but might also have “sharper elbows” when, for example, you are selling the company since he needs to prove himself by making the firm money.

So how do you pick the right partner?  Looking at their portfolio can help, but really this is where you need experienced advisors/seed investors who know all the people involved, their reputations etc and can make warm intros.

Share:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter

Related posts:

  1. Does a VC’s brand matter?
  2. Which VC firm should I pitch?
  3. Getting a job in venture capital
  4. Pitching the VC partnership
  5. The NYC tech scene is exploding

8 comments ↓

#1 Twitted by cdixon on 08.19.09 at 10:45 am

[...] This post was Twitted by cdixon [...]

#2 kylie sachs on 08.19.09 at 10:48 am

Totally agree except that every once in a while, a partner leaves a firm and then you get some other partner…and who knows what happens then. So I still think it makes sense to meet as many partners as possible. You just never know what might happen and who might be your internal “sponsor” over time, and what their incentives are.

#3 chris on 08.19.09 at 10:51 am

Very true. I should have mentioned that. Thanks for pointing it out.

#4 David Cancel on 08.19.09 at 10:57 am

Keep dropping the science. Please. Great stuff.

I agree the partner is everything in a VC deal. At Compete I was lucky enough to walk through the “apocalypse” that was 2000-2004 with Ted Dintersmith of CRV, the best investor I’ve ever worked with. He “saved” and “made” the company, no doubt about it.

The other reasons that worked was 1) the rest of his partners were in general “good guys”, and 2) he held a lot of sway within his firm (track record).

I will warn entrepreneurs that no matter how great a partner is you still have to evaluate the rest of their partners and make sure that you will be able to work with them too. Their are several VC partners that I really like who are part of firms that I consider “toxic”. No matter how much I like those partners their firms make doing a deal with them a non-starter.

#5 chris on 08.19.09 at 2:38 pm

Hey David – Good points. I also have firms I consider “toxic” – no matter who the partner is.
Chris

#6 Jerry Ji on 08.20.09 at 9:23 am

Great job, of course it’d be appreciated better if you guys would highlight those toxic partners/firms on TheFunded.com

#7 Jaron's opinion: Selecting the right Partner on 08.21.09 at 6:46 am

[...] Jaron has fytched a comment 6 seconds ago while browsing http://www.cdixon.org/?p=319 [...]

#8 It’s the partner, not the firm | Igniting Startups - nPost on 08.25.09 at 2:58 pm

[...] From cdixon.org [...]

Leave a Comment