<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter killed RSS (and that’s a bad thing)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cdixon.org/2009/09/29/twitter-killed-rss-and-thats-a-bad-thing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/09/29/twitter-killed-rss-and-thats-a-bad-thing/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 11:04:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter vs. RSS Feed &#8211; and their revenue models?</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/09/29/twitter-killed-rss-and-thats-a-bad-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-12173</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter vs. RSS Feed &#8211; and their revenue models?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2011 11:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1284#comment-12173</guid>
		<description>[...] great post recommending you to give any RSS Reader a try Chris Dixon makes a good point saying that Twitter killed RSS  I think that both of them are right. What do you [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] great post recommending you to give any RSS Reader a try Chris Dixon makes a good point saying that Twitter killed RSS  I think that both of them are right. What do you [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Umfrage: Welchen Stellenwert haben RSS-Reader für euch? » netzwertig.com</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/09/29/twitter-killed-rss-and-thats-a-bad-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-10815</link>
		<dc:creator>Umfrage: Welchen Stellenwert haben RSS-Reader für euch? » netzwertig.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 07:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1284#comment-10815</guid>
		<description>[...] ist tot. RSS ist nicht tot. Oder sind vielleicht nur RSS-Reader tot? Diese Fragen treiben (mal wieder) die internationale Blogosphäre um, nachdem IAC bekannt gab, seinen webbasierten RSS-Reader [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ist tot. RSS ist nicht tot. Oder sind vielleicht nur RSS-Reader tot? Diese Fragen treiben (mal wieder) die internationale Blogosphäre um, nachdem IAC bekannt gab, seinen webbasierten RSS-Reader [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Twitter killed RSS (and that’s a bad thing) cdixon.org – chris dixon's blog -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/09/29/twitter-killed-rss-and-thats-a-bad-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-10146</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Twitter killed RSS (and that’s a bad thing) cdixon.org – chris dixon's blog -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 13:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1284#comment-10146</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by chris dixon and Bharath Mohan, Stephen Stark. Stephen Stark said: I find I&#039;m using Google Reader less as well. http://j.mp/agZPZ1 (via @cdixon) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by chris dixon and Bharath Mohan, Stephen Stark. Stephen Stark said: I find I&#39;m using Google Reader less as well. <a href="http://j.mp/agZPZ1" rel="nofollow">http://j.mp/agZPZ1</a> (via @cdixon) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graphs cdixon.org &#8211; chris dixon&#39;s blog</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/09/29/twitter-killed-rss-and-thats-a-bad-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-9725</link>
		<dc:creator>Graphs cdixon.org &#8211; chris dixon&#39;s blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 17:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1284#comment-9725</guid>
		<description>[...] them following you. This allowed Twitter to evolve into an extremely useful publishing platform, replacing RSS for many people. The Twitter graph isn&#8217;t transitive but one of its most powerful uses is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] them following you. This allowed Twitter to evolve into an extremely useful publishing platform, replacing RSS for many people. The Twitter graph isn&#8217;t transitive but one of its most powerful uses is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Build Your Own Web Application: Education</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/09/29/twitter-killed-rss-and-thats-a-bad-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-6507</link>
		<dc:creator>Build Your Own Web Application: Education</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 02:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1284#comment-6507</guid>
		<description>[...] there I curated who I followed more or less identically to my Reader curation. Some people claim  Twitter killed RSS, which powers Reader.  I find this silly.  I read Twitter on my phone and do Reader on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] there I curated who I followed more or less identically to my Reader curation. Some people claim  Twitter killed RSS, which powers Reader.  I find this silly.  I read Twitter on my phone and do Reader on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Using the web today or too much data for the given time @ Synaptic &#124; preona</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/09/29/twitter-killed-rss-and-thats-a-bad-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-5338</link>
		<dc:creator>Using the web today or too much data for the given time @ Synaptic &#124; preona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 13:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1284#comment-5338</guid>
		<description>[...] Twitter killed RSS (and that&#8217;s a bad thing) (cdixon.org) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Twitter killed RSS (and that&#8217;s a bad thing) (cdixon.org) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Camplejohn</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/09/29/twitter-killed-rss-and-thats-a-bad-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-5767</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Camplejohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 00:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1284#comment-5767</guid>
		<description>RSS, the protocol, isn&#039;t dead it&#039;s just time for it to fade into the woodwork, just like other protocols/standards.   I don&#039;t ask you what HTML Browser you use, or what SMTP server your company uses, these are just the building blocks that average users don&#039;t need to know about.   RSS is a great technology, but a crap user experience for the average user.   It&#039;s time for the RSS acronym to disappear, and the RSS icon and reader to be replaced with a better and more valuable user experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RSS, the protocol, isn&#39;t dead it&#39;s just time for it to fade into the woodwork, just like other protocols/standards.   I don&#39;t ask you what HTML Browser you use, or what SMTP server your company uses, these are just the building blocks that average users don&#39;t need to know about.   RSS is a great technology, but a crap user experience for the average user.   It&#39;s time for the RSS acronym to disappear, and the RSS icon and reader to be replaced with a better and more valuable user experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Camplejohn</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/09/29/twitter-killed-rss-and-thats-a-bad-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-5289</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Camplejohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 16:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1284#comment-5289</guid>
		<description>RSS, the protocol, isn&#039;t dead it&#039;s just time for it to fade into the woodwork, just like other protocols/standards.   I don&#039;t ask you what HTML Browser you use, or what SMTP server your company uses, these are just the building blocks that average users don&#039;t need to know about.   RSS is a great technology, but a crap user experience for the average user.   It&#039;s time for the RSS acronym to disappear, and the RSS icon and reader to be replaced with a better and more valuable user experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RSS, the protocol, isn&#39;t dead it&#39;s just time for it to fade into the woodwork, just like other protocols/standards.   I don&#39;t ask you what HTML Browser you use, or what SMTP server your company uses, these are just the building blocks that average users don&#39;t need to know about.   RSS is a great technology, but a crap user experience for the average user.   It&#39;s time for the RSS acronym to disappear, and the RSS icon and reader to be replaced with a better and more valuable user experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elena Benito-Ruiz</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/09/29/twitter-killed-rss-and-thats-a-bad-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-3981</link>
		<dc:creator>Elena Benito-Ruiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 06:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1284#comment-3981</guid>
		<description>I also use the feedly + greader combo to read feeds, including Microplaza&#039;s!&lt;br&gt;I would welcome you to dig into MP or wait for the MP2.0 :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also use the feedly + greader combo to read feeds, including Microplaza&#39;s!<br />I would welcome you to dig into MP or wait for the MP2.0 <img src='http://cdixon.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: burtlo</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/09/29/twitter-killed-rss-and-thats-a-bad-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-3867</link>
		<dc:creator>burtlo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 15:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1284#comment-3867</guid>
		<description>Before RSS was a much bigger deal, I didn’t understand how it was a game changer in terms of reading the net. I had friends way ahead of me in this game.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I learned from that now and have a well populated Google Reader. I continue to hear that Twitter has now made this extinct but I haven’t gotten that impression. However, that is mostly because I’m using the vanilla-based twitter through the web and there you have no great tools to stay on top of trending topics.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It wasn’t until I found myself at a conference that #blahblah and trending topics became important because they weren’t just trending topics they were live chat rooms, live feeds of data, or streams.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I really saw a benefit to Twitter for the first time. Individuals had these streams of data of all types and if the #trended it or used the right keywords there was amazing use. I could now pipe in data from all these sources about the topic I wanted. It was a disjointed forum that erupts out of communication. Which is better than trying to get people to come to a temporal place to act as a forum.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So I just downloaded Tweetdeck and I see where it is in some ways an awesome tool that far outstrips RSS as a discovery tool. But I still can’t see it replacing RSS for me because there is far too much duplication and spam.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So I see Twitter as a great discovery tool, I can pull twitter searches into Google Reader and then use those to find the blogs/info that I eventually want add as permanent RSS feeds.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I see it as a compliment, not as a replacement.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Problems:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;* ReTweets are awesome if you are trying to expose your audience to the information. However, to those within the same circle, say at an event, it is a duplication of the previous tweet.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;* Duplication (in general) of posts in a given space, like when people quote people at a particular event. An event has a measurable echo here and the larger the personality the larger the echo.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;* Spam from outside individuals that are adding negative value to the space (compared to a repost which is perhaps considered neutral or only slightly negative).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Some things I need for twitter to gain more value:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;* There are no decent tools to deal with the duplication. You don’t want the streams of data to be blocked, you want clients to manage it. I imagine that a tool that compares posts 140 character posts might have a good shot at dealing with the duplication.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;* There are no good community tools to assist with positively reinforcing good posts and negatively reinforcing spam/bad posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before RSS was a much bigger deal, I didn’t understand how it was a game changer in terms of reading the net. I had friends way ahead of me in this game.</p>
<p>I learned from that now and have a well populated Google Reader. I continue to hear that Twitter has now made this extinct but I haven’t gotten that impression. However, that is mostly because I’m using the vanilla-based twitter through the web and there you have no great tools to stay on top of trending topics.</p>
<p>It wasn’t until I found myself at a conference that #blahblah and trending topics became important because they weren’t just trending topics they were live chat rooms, live feeds of data, or streams.</p>
<p>I really saw a benefit to Twitter for the first time. Individuals had these streams of data of all types and if the #trended it or used the right keywords there was amazing use. I could now pipe in data from all these sources about the topic I wanted. It was a disjointed forum that erupts out of communication. Which is better than trying to get people to come to a temporal place to act as a forum.</p>
<p>So I just downloaded Tweetdeck and I see where it is in some ways an awesome tool that far outstrips RSS as a discovery tool. But I still can’t see it replacing RSS for me because there is far too much duplication and spam.</p>
<p>So I see Twitter as a great discovery tool, I can pull twitter searches into Google Reader and then use those to find the blogs/info that I eventually want add as permanent RSS feeds.</p>
<p>I see it as a compliment, not as a replacement.</p>
<p>Problems:</p>
<p>* ReTweets are awesome if you are trying to expose your audience to the information. However, to those within the same circle, say at an event, it is a duplication of the previous tweet.</p>
<p>* Duplication (in general) of posts in a given space, like when people quote people at a particular event. An event has a measurable echo here and the larger the personality the larger the echo.</p>
<p>* Spam from outside individuals that are adding negative value to the space (compared to a repost which is perhaps considered neutral or only slightly negative).</p>
<p>Some things I need for twitter to gain more value:</p>
<p>* There are no decent tools to deal with the duplication. You don’t want the streams of data to be blocked, you want clients to manage it. I imagine that a tool that compares posts 140 character posts might have a good shot at dealing with the duplication.</p>
<p>* There are no good community tools to assist with positively reinforcing good posts and negatively reinforcing spam/bad posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter killed RSS (and that’s a bad thing) &#124; Igniting Startups - nPost</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/09/29/twitter-killed-rss-and-thats-a-bad-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-3842</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter killed RSS (and that’s a bad thing) &#124; Igniting Startups - nPost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 14:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1284#comment-3842</guid>
		<description>[...] From cdixon.org [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] From cdixon.org [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Henderson</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/09/29/twitter-killed-rss-and-thats-a-bad-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-3829</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Henderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1284#comment-3829</guid>
		<description>I just use MP for the twitter link tracking. I haven&#039;t really dug into it too much more than that. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For feeds I use GReader and the Feedly plugin for Firefox. Really like that combo.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-M</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just use MP for the twitter link tracking. I haven&#39;t really dug into it too much more than that. </p>
<p>For feeds I use GReader and the Feedly plugin for Firefox. Really like that combo.</p>
<p>-M</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michaeljordanshoes</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/09/29/twitter-killed-rss-and-thats-a-bad-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-3779</link>
		<dc:creator>michaeljordanshoes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 07:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1284#comment-3779</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usa-jordan.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Air Jordan Shoes&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usa-jordan.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Michael Jordan Shoes&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usa-jordan.com/65-air-jordan-10&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Air Jordan 10&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usa-jordan.com/66-air-jordan-11&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Air Jordan 11&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usa-jordan.com/67-air-jordan-12&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Air Jordan 12&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usa-jordan.com/68-air-jordan-13&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Air Jordan 13&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usa-jordan.com/69-air-jordan-14&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Air Jordan 14&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usa-jordan.com/70-air-jordan-15&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Air Jordan 15&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usa-jordan.com/71-air-jordan-16&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Air Jordan 16&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usa-jordan.com/72-air-jordan-17&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Air Jordan 17&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b><a href="http://www.usa-jordan.com" rel="nofollow">Air Jordan Shoes</a></b><br /><b><a href="http://www.usa-jordan.com" rel="nofollow">Michael Jordan Shoes</a></b><br /><a href="http://www.usa-jordan.com/65-air-jordan-10" rel="nofollow">Air Jordan 10</a><br /><a href="http://www.usa-jordan.com/66-air-jordan-11" rel="nofollow">Air Jordan 11</a><br /><a href="http://www.usa-jordan.com/67-air-jordan-12" rel="nofollow">Air Jordan 12</a><br /><a href="http://www.usa-jordan.com/68-air-jordan-13" rel="nofollow">Air Jordan 13</a><br /><a href="http://www.usa-jordan.com/69-air-jordan-14" rel="nofollow">Air Jordan 14</a><br /><a href="http://www.usa-jordan.com/70-air-jordan-15" rel="nofollow">Air Jordan 15</a><br /><a href="http://www.usa-jordan.com/71-air-jordan-16" rel="nofollow">Air Jordan 16</a><br /><a href="http://www.usa-jordan.com/72-air-jordan-17" rel="nofollow">Air Jordan 17</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter/RSS &#171; Five Years Too Late</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/09/29/twitter-killed-rss-and-thats-a-bad-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-3754</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter/RSS &#171; Five Years Too Late</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 11:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1284#comment-3754</guid>
		<description>[...] to respond to something another blogger writes, I&#8217;ll do so in the comments section there, but two of Chris&#8217; recent posts inadvertently touched on a theme I&#8217;ve spent a bunch of time [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to respond to something another blogger writes, I&#8217;ll do so in the comments section there, but two of Chris&#8217; recent posts inadvertently touched on a theme I&#8217;ve spent a bunch of time [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ElenaBRuiz</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/09/29/twitter-killed-rss-and-thats-a-bad-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-3753</link>
		<dc:creator>ElenaBRuiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 09:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1284#comment-3753</guid>
		<description>Hi Chris&lt;br&gt;If you wanna go &#039;open&#039;, try identi.ca&lt;br&gt;I&#039;ve gone thru all comments, extremely interesting to us, here @microplaza.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What we are trying to do with microplaza is to filter noise from twitter by showing only those tweets with links, not only from the public timeline but what&#039;s more important from your personal/Twitter network.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;ShanaC says: &quot;The thing is, that those links aren&#039;t storeable&quot; &lt;br&gt;Well they are, use the Bookmark option and you&#039;ll always have them over there.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ben Atlas says: &quot;I still find that reader gives me what I want without the noise. I separated Reader into groups/folders.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yes, grouping and categorizing is a step beyond dealing with noise. What we did for instance is to give users the possibility to create groups (we call them Tribes) and enroll ppl to those groups...and then when you click on a tribe you get every single url retweeted by the members of that tribe, along with a thumbnail and associated tweets. If you prefer, you can also grab the RSS and follow your tribes on Feedly for instance (imho, the best RSS reader out there, but I&#039;m a visual learner so that might do the trick).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Wolfy: thanks for the Microplaza mention, are you combining MP with RSS readers?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@clarkethomas: &quot;There&#039;s no easy way to group or have a history of posts in twitter&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well yes by combining tribes creation + bookmarks.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Right now we are in the process of developing a more stable/robust Microplaza, v2.0, and apart from the backend improvements we are definitely trying to listen to ppl needs (our own as well, since we also use RSS and Twitter for own purposes) &amp; come up with a better personalized app, forthcoming features are being evolved around the tribes idea (if you want to stay tuned, you can also follow @microplaza or subscribe to our &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.whatever-company.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;blog&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The personalized real-time is the next thing, it&#039;s always like that, when a given technology hits the mainstream and there&#039;s a plethora of (dis)information and resources etc...the next stage is to provide users with filtering tools, and the stage after that is to provide the personalization of filtering. And real-time...which is even harder due to the crazy activity on Twitter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris<br />If you wanna go &#39;open&#39;, try identi.ca<br />I&#39;ve gone thru all comments, extremely interesting to us, here @microplaza.</p>
<p>What we are trying to do with microplaza is to filter noise from twitter by showing only those tweets with links, not only from the public timeline but what&#39;s more important from your personal/Twitter network.</p>
<p>ShanaC says: &#8220;The thing is, that those links aren&#39;t storeable&#8221; <br />Well they are, use the Bookmark option and you&#39;ll always have them over there.</p>
<p>Ben Atlas says: &#8220;I still find that reader gives me what I want without the noise. I separated Reader into groups/folders.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, grouping and categorizing is a step beyond dealing with noise. What we did for instance is to give users the possibility to create groups (we call them Tribes) and enroll ppl to those groups&#8230;and then when you click on a tribe you get every single url retweeted by the members of that tribe, along with a thumbnail and associated tweets. If you prefer, you can also grab the RSS and follow your tribes on Feedly for instance (imho, the best RSS reader out there, but I&#39;m a visual learner so that might do the trick).</p>
<p>@Wolfy: thanks for the Microplaza mention, are you combining MP with RSS readers?</p>
<p>@clarkethomas: &#8220;There&#39;s no easy way to group or have a history of posts in twitter&#8221;</p>
<p>Well yes by combining tribes creation + bookmarks.</p>
<p>Right now we are in the process of developing a more stable/robust Microplaza, v2.0, and apart from the backend improvements we are definitely trying to listen to ppl needs (our own as well, since we also use RSS and Twitter for own purposes) &#038; come up with a better personalized app, forthcoming features are being evolved around the tribes idea (if you want to stay tuned, you can also follow @microplaza or subscribe to our <a href="http://blog.whatever-company.com/" rel="nofollow">blog</a>)</p>
<p>The personalized real-time is the next thing, it&#39;s always like that, when a given technology hits the mainstream and there&#39;s a plethora of (dis)information and resources etc&#8230;the next stage is to provide users with filtering tools, and the stage after that is to provide the personalization of filtering. And real-time&#8230;which is even harder due to the crazy activity on Twitter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why does it matter that Twitter is supplanting RSS? &#124; Igniting Startups - nPost</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/09/29/twitter-killed-rss-and-thats-a-bad-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-3738</link>
		<dc:creator>Why does it matter that Twitter is supplanting RSS? &#124; Igniting Startups - nPost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 19:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1284#comment-3738</guid>
		<description>[...] other day I claimed that Twitter is supplanting RSS, and that long term that’s a bad thing.  Andrew Weissman had a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] other day I claimed that Twitter is supplanting RSS, and that long term that’s a bad thing.  Andrew Weissman had a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris dixon</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/09/29/twitter-killed-rss-and-thats-a-bad-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-3727</link>
		<dc:creator>chris dixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 14:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1284#comment-3727</guid>
		<description>I always tweet my new blog posts.  maybe you just missed them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always tweet my new blog posts.  maybe you just missed them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: terrycojones</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/09/29/twitter-killed-rss-and-thats-a-bad-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-3715</link>
		<dc:creator>terrycojones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 11:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1284#comment-3715</guid>
		<description>Is there a reason why you don&#039;t tweet links to your new blog posts? I completely stopped using Google reader a year ago, in favor of Tweeted links. I follow you, would be happy to read the majority of your blog posts, but am not going to start in with GReader again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a reason why you don&#39;t tweet links to your new blog posts? I completely stopped using Google reader a year ago, in favor of Tweeted links. I follow you, would be happy to read the majority of your blog posts, but am not going to start in with GReader again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave F</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/09/29/twitter-killed-rss-and-thats-a-bad-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-3576</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 04:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1284#comment-3576</guid>
		<description>RSS doesn&#039;t have to die but innovation must return to that medium... Twitter frustrates me because it is a simple concept which is useless proved so by Admins back in the day but repackaged and made accessible via smart phones - the only reason it has caught on.  Patience will see twitter die, when replaced by a useful solution but that may be years out do to the limited ability of the mass public.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RSS doesn&#39;t have to die but innovation must return to that medium&#8230; Twitter frustrates me because it is a simple concept which is useless proved so by Admins back in the day but repackaged and made accessible via smart phones &#8211; the only reason it has caught on.  Patience will see twitter die, when replaced by a useful solution but that may be years out do to the limited ability of the mass public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clarke thomas</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/09/29/twitter-killed-rss-and-thats-a-bad-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-3563</link>
		<dc:creator>clarke thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 20:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1284#comment-3563</guid>
		<description>twitter may replace the AP steam, but I don&#039;t see it displacing RSS. There&#039;s no easy way to group or have a history of posts in twitter.  With RSS I can be offline for awhile &amp; return to data from several days, twitter is more real-time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>twitter may replace the AP steam, but I don&#39;t see it displacing RSS. There&#39;s no easy way to group or have a history of posts in twitter.  With RSS I can be offline for awhile &#038; return to data from several days, twitter is more real-time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Warila</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/09/29/twitter-killed-rss-and-thats-a-bad-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-3557</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Warila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 19:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1284#comment-3557</guid>
		<description>Think this through.  If everyone moved from RSS to Twitter, some critical mass of humans still have to read the stuff they tweet about.  As a first-consume (before you share) technology, Twitter doesn&#039;t scale to everyone.  As you approach all-of-humanity on the adoption curve, the curve that represents the dumbing down of humanity begins to rise proportionately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think this through.  If everyone moved from RSS to Twitter, some critical mass of humans still have to read the stuff they tweet about.  As a first-consume (before you share) technology, Twitter doesn&#39;t scale to everyone.  As you approach all-of-humanity on the adoption curve, the curve that represents the dumbing down of humanity begins to rise proportionately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ValleyDriver</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/09/29/twitter-killed-rss-and-thats-a-bad-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-3547</link>
		<dc:creator>ValleyDriver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 16:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1284#comment-3547</guid>
		<description>i think i get your point. but that implies one uses Twitter. i gave up on Twitter months ago. just don&#039;t need to know that quickly. i use Google Reader to accumulate posts to my favorite websites and posts. then when i am in the mood i go to Reader and catch up - once a day or may ever two or three days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think i get your point. but that implies one uses Twitter. i gave up on Twitter months ago. just don&#39;t need to know that quickly. i use Google Reader to accumulate posts to my favorite websites and posts. then when i am in the mood i go to Reader and catch up &#8211; once a day or may ever two or three days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolfy</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/09/29/twitter-killed-rss-and-thats-a-bad-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-3535</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolfy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 12:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1284#comment-3535</guid>
		<description>Twitter is too hard to filter and you have to monitor it in real time to get value out of the links. Microplaza is good, but I find myself relying on my feed reader more than ever. I use Google Reader and Feedly. And by now I have all the same articles in my reader as are being tweeted, and Feedly makes it easy to find them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-M</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter is too hard to filter and you have to monitor it in real time to get value out of the links. Microplaza is good, but I find myself relying on my feed reader more than ever. I use Google Reader and Feedly. And by now I have all the same articles in my reader as are being tweeted, and Feedly makes it easy to find them.</p>
<p>-M</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Paley</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/09/29/twitter-killed-rss-and-thats-a-bad-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-3532</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Paley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 12:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1284#comment-3532</guid>
		<description>I would at least say that RSS &#039;the protocol&#039; isn&#039;t going anywhere, but MAYBE RSS &#039;the client reader app&#039; is in trouble. That said, IMO RSS Readers scale better for following lots of blogs. There is so much noise on Twitter and unless you are following your stream constantly, it&#039;s really easy to miss anything that was posted more than an hour or two earlier - especially when you start following more than just a few hundred people.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The protocol is used for way, way more than just a way for client readers to subscribe to content. It acts as the plumbing for a lot of CMS integration these days, as one example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would at least say that RSS &#39;the protocol&#39; isn&#39;t going anywhere, but MAYBE RSS &#39;the client reader app&#39; is in trouble. That said, IMO RSS Readers scale better for following lots of blogs. There is so much noise on Twitter and unless you are following your stream constantly, it&#39;s really easy to miss anything that was posted more than an hour or two earlier &#8211; especially when you start following more than just a few hundred people.</p>
<p>The protocol is used for way, way more than just a way for client readers to subscribe to content. It acts as the plumbing for a lot of CMS integration these days, as one example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter Killed RSS (and That’s a Bad Thing) [Voices] &#124; Stoth</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/09/29/twitter-killed-rss-and-thats-a-bad-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-3514</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter Killed RSS (and That’s a Bad Thing) [Voices] &#124; Stoth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 07:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1284#comment-3514</guid>
		<description>[...] Read the rest of this post on the original site    Buy This Item: [Click here to buy this item] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the rest of this post on the original site    Buy This Item: [Click here to buy this item] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris dixon</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/09/29/twitter-killed-rss-and-thats-a-bad-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-3507</link>
		<dc:creator>chris dixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 00:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1284#comment-3507</guid>
		<description>I mean redudancy of institutions - what I think you mean by businesses.  I&#039;ll write more about it shortly.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;URL shorteners were a niche novelty pre twitter.  Bad guys wouldn&#039;t waste their time on them.  History suggests its only a matter of time before someone penetrates twitter accounts or url shortener to create a major, web-delivered malware attack.  URL shorteners could get ahead of this by thinking about security sooner rather than later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mean redudancy of institutions &#8211; what I think you mean by businesses.  I&#39;ll write more about it shortly.</p>
<p>URL shorteners were a niche novelty pre twitter.  Bad guys wouldn&#39;t waste their time on them.  History suggests its only a matter of time before someone penetrates twitter accounts or url shortener to create a major, web-delivered malware attack.  URL shorteners could get ahead of this by thinking about security sooner rather than later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris dixon</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/09/29/twitter-killed-rss-and-thats-a-bad-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-3506</link>
		<dc:creator>chris dixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 00:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1284#comment-3506</guid>
		<description>Interesting.  I think you are right that one of the two forces will win and it will probably be driving traffic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.  I think you are right that one of the two forces will win and it will probably be driving traffic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShanaC</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/09/29/twitter-killed-rss-and-thats-a-bad-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-3505</link>
		<dc:creator>ShanaC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 23:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1284#comment-3505</guid>
		<description>Correct.  Follow a long tail item and you realize how hard it is to get good information off of twitter.  I still will just go to the top blog on the subject.  Seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correct.  Follow a long tail item and you realize how hard it is to get good information off of twitter.  I still will just go to the top blog on the subject.  Seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeekMBA360</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/09/29/twitter-killed-rss-and-thats-a-bad-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-3503</link>
		<dc:creator>GeekMBA360</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 22:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1284#comment-3503</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not so sure that Twitter killed RSS. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;RSS subscriber count of my blog is still growing steadily. I did notice that instead of commenting on my blog, some readers started to send me direct messages via Twitter regarding my blog posts. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I do think that RSS could become more powerful if more identifiable information can be added (e.g. i like to know who is subscribing to my blog.) But, I think RSS is here to stay, and Twitter will complement it, but not kill it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m not so sure that Twitter killed RSS. </p>
<p>RSS subscriber count of my blog is still growing steadily. I did notice that instead of commenting on my blog, some readers started to send me direct messages via Twitter regarding my blog posts. </p>
<p>I do think that RSS could become more powerful if more identifiable information can be added (e.g. i like to know who is subscribing to my blog.) But, I think RSS is here to stay, and Twitter will complement it, but not kill it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rathan</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/09/29/twitter-killed-rss-and-thats-a-bad-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-3490</link>
		<dc:creator>Rathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1284#comment-3490</guid>
		<description>I wonder if its more of a UX/UI problem with Google Reader rather than the death of RSS.  It seems like Twitter is easier to follow because the interface isn&#039;t clunky, and you can scan a lot of information quickly, where as Google Reader, you have to actually scroll past the entire article.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If the postings were short titles that you can quickly scan through, would that save your impression of Google Reader?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if its more of a UX/UI problem with Google Reader rather than the death of RSS.  It seems like Twitter is easier to follow because the interface isn&#39;t clunky, and you can scan a lot of information quickly, where as Google Reader, you have to actually scroll past the entire article.</p>
<p>If the postings were short titles that you can quickly scan through, would that save your impression of Google Reader?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ianrosenwach</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/09/29/twitter-killed-rss-and-thats-a-bad-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-3487</link>
		<dc:creator>ianrosenwach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 13:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1284#comment-3487</guid>
		<description>Yes, this brings up the question of how much content Publishers should include in their RSS feeds, and the bigger issue of how to monetize an RSS feed.  AdSense for Feeds (Feedburner) seems to be the standard but I don&#039;t see it as a big business just yet. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is the delicate balance between driving traffic to a blog and syndicating content to a 3rd party.  Twitter drives traffic AND is a place to read short content.  One of these two forces will need to win, and I think it will be driving traffic.  That&#039;s what was successful for Google.  It&#039;s best to be a platform for discovery than a destination in itself.  The platform is much more scalable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, this brings up the question of how much content Publishers should include in their RSS feeds, and the bigger issue of how to monetize an RSS feed.  AdSense for Feeds (Feedburner) seems to be the standard but I don&#39;t see it as a big business just yet. </p>
<p>There is the delicate balance between driving traffic to a blog and syndicating content to a 3rd party.  Twitter drives traffic AND is a place to read short content.  One of these two forces will need to win, and I think it will be driving traffic.  That&#39;s what was successful for Google.  It&#39;s best to be a platform for discovery than a destination in itself.  The platform is much more scalable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ianrosenwach</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/09/29/twitter-killed-rss-and-thats-a-bad-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-3485</link>
		<dc:creator>ianrosenwach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 13:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1284#comment-3485</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ianrosenwach</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/09/29/twitter-killed-rss-and-thats-a-bad-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-3486</link>
		<dc:creator>ianrosenwach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 13:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1284#comment-3486</guid>
		<description>Yes, this brings up the question of how much content Publishers should include in their RSS feeds, and the bigger issue of how to monetize an RSS feed.  AdSense for Feeds (Feedburner), but that seems to be the standard but I don&#039;t see it as a big business just yet. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is the delicate balance between driving traffic to a blog and syndicating content to a 3rd party.  Twitter drives traffic AND is a place to read short content.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One of these two forces will need to win, and I think it will be driving traffic.  That&#039;s what was successful for Google.  It&#039;s best to be a platform for discovery than a destination in itself.  The platform is much more scalable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, this brings up the question of how much content Publishers should include in their RSS feeds, and the bigger issue of how to monetize an RSS feed.  AdSense for Feeds (Feedburner), but that seems to be the standard but I don&#39;t see it as a big business just yet. </p>
<p>There is the delicate balance between driving traffic to a blog and syndicating content to a 3rd party.  Twitter drives traffic AND is a place to read short content.  </p>
<p>One of these two forces will need to win, and I think it will be driving traffic.  That&#39;s what was successful for Google.  It&#39;s best to be a platform for discovery than a destination in itself.  The platform is much more scalable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris dixon</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/09/29/twitter-killed-rss-and-thats-a-bad-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-3484</link>
		<dc:creator>chris dixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 13:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1284#comment-3484</guid>
		<description>Yes, but you could imagine Twitter apps that could/will fix that soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, but you could imagine Twitter apps that could/will fix that soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris dixon</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/09/29/twitter-killed-rss-and-thats-a-bad-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-3483</link>
		<dc:creator>chris dixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 13:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1284#comment-3483</guid>
		<description>Maybe the messaging system only needs to send headlines &amp; links and  &lt;br&gt;the long form stuff can sit on blogs.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Twitter could be good for monetizing blogs since people like me are  &lt;br&gt;actually visiting their sites again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe the messaging system only needs to send headlines &#038; links and  <br />the long form stuff can sit on blogs.</p>
<p>Twitter could be good for monetizing blogs since people like me are  <br />actually visiting their sites again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris dixon</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/09/29/twitter-killed-rss-and-thats-a-bad-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-3482</link>
		<dc:creator>chris dixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 13:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1284#comment-3482</guid>
		<description>Being online constantly ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being online constantly <img src='http://cdixon.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aweissman</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/09/29/twitter-killed-rss-and-thats-a-bad-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-3480</link>
		<dc:creator>aweissman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1284#comment-3480</guid>
		<description>I am all for openeness - more than most people - but even if it were not as open - what&#039;s the negative affect on users?  Redundancy can mean business wise or application wise - so I eagerly await your post ;-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As to URL shorteners - I am so unobjective here as to be worthless - but they have been around for a decade without a material phishing problem.  Not that it cant happen - but its an issue was beyond url shorteners - and it can and has been majorly minimized</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am all for openeness &#8211; more than most people &#8211; but even if it were not as open &#8211; what&#39;s the negative affect on users?  Redundancy can mean business wise or application wise &#8211; so I eagerly await your post <img src='http://cdixon.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>As to URL shorteners &#8211; I am so unobjective here as to be worthless &#8211; but they have been around for a decade without a material phishing problem.  Not that it cant happen &#8211; but its an issue was beyond url shorteners &#8211; and it can and has been majorly minimized</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris dixon</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/09/29/twitter-killed-rss-and-thats-a-bad-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-3478</link>
		<dc:creator>chris dixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1284#comment-3478</guid>
		<description>URL shorteners are a phisher&#039;s dream.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Twitter is open for now but who knows in the future.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mor importantly, the only way to have true reliability is to have  &lt;br&gt;institutional redundancy (this requires more explanation-I&#039;ll write a  &lt;br&gt;post about it)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>URL shorteners are a phisher&#39;s dream.</p>
<p>Twitter is open for now but who knows in the future.</p>
<p>Mor importantly, the only way to have true reliability is to have  <br />institutional redundancy (this requires more explanation-I&#39;ll write a  <br />post about it)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aweissman</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/09/29/twitter-killed-rss-and-thats-a-bad-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-3477</link>
		<dc:creator>aweissman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1284#comment-3477</guid>
		<description>Twitter is the most open application people are currently using.  It&#039;s open on the way in and the way out.  The variety of applications using the Twitter api are astounding in that they cover many use cases.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Given that, why  will Ashton and Oprah someday care?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter is the most open application people are currently using.  It&#39;s open on the way in and the way out.  The variety of applications using the Twitter api are astounding in that they cover many use cases.</p>
<p>Given that, why  will Ashton and Oprah someday care?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: giffc</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/09/29/twitter-killed-rss-and-thats-a-bad-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-3476</link>
		<dc:creator>giffc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1284#comment-3476</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with Ben.  An rss reader allows me to more efficiently categorize and prioritize interesting authors, and dip into various topics asynchronously when the time is right.  I suppose it comes down to user behavior: I don&#039;t religiously peruse and backtrack on my Twitter stream, but rather dip in and out periodically. If that was my only source for blogs, I would miss too much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with Ben.  An rss reader allows me to more efficiently categorize and prioritize interesting authors, and dip into various topics asynchronously when the time is right.  I suppose it comes down to user behavior: I don&#39;t religiously peruse and backtrack on my Twitter stream, but rather dip in and out periodically. If that was my only source for blogs, I would miss too much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thorsten Claus</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/09/29/twitter-killed-rss-and-thats-a-bad-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-3475</link>
		<dc:creator>Thorsten Claus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1284#comment-3475</guid>
		<description>Nice catchy title, short enough to retweet ;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Twitter is too noisy with other stuff. I also get lots of tweets of the same title - still not more relevant to me. Even worse, ten different URL shorteners point to the same destination. And I don&#039;t want to install and maintain a Firefox plugin for that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;about 30% of my RSS subscriptions are things I see very few tweets about. So do I have to go out and search for people who are not only interested in that topic but also tweet about it? Why? And will there be enough people who do exactly that so the story doesn&#039;t get drowned in the rest of the Twitter noise?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Tweets are also far from &quot;recommendations&quot; or &quot;relevant&quot;. How can ONE user with 12,000+ followers &quot;recommend&quot; something that fits your interest, other than &quot;hey, it&#039;s a gadget&quot;, or &quot;it&#039;s about VCs&quot;... it has to be a pretty focused user with some awesome aggregation, and I met only few of these.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Try and search for something that was inside an article you were pointed to, but not in the title of your tweet... &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The list could go on and on, but probably all of the &quot;gripes&quot; for replacing an RSS reader with twitter are also really interesting startup opportunities: Search in content linked from twitter, ranked by your followers and same destination of URL-shorteners; analyze your link-click behavior, show a &quot;like&quot; bar on the top after you clicked, and later analyze which of your followees are tweeting the most interesting links; give certain topics or people a rank of importance, and then either color code, display an &quot;importance bar&quot;, or plainly filter for importance below your custom threshold &quot;x&quot;; ... again the list could go on and on ;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If only I had more money for funding...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice catchy title, short enough to retweet <img src='http://cdixon.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Twitter is too noisy with other stuff. I also get lots of tweets of the same title &#8211; still not more relevant to me. Even worse, ten different URL shorteners point to the same destination. And I don&#39;t want to install and maintain a Firefox plugin for that.</p>
<p>about 30% of my RSS subscriptions are things I see very few tweets about. So do I have to go out and search for people who are not only interested in that topic but also tweet about it? Why? And will there be enough people who do exactly that so the story doesn&#39;t get drowned in the rest of the Twitter noise?</p>
<p>Tweets are also far from &#8220;recommendations&#8221; or &#8220;relevant&#8221;. How can ONE user with 12,000+ followers &#8220;recommend&#8221; something that fits your interest, other than &#8220;hey, it&#39;s a gadget&#8221;, or &#8220;it&#39;s about VCs&#8221;&#8230; it has to be a pretty focused user with some awesome aggregation, and I met only few of these.</p>
<p>Try and search for something that was inside an article you were pointed to, but not in the title of your tweet&#8230; </p>
<p>The list could go on and on, but probably all of the &#8220;gripes&#8221; for replacing an RSS reader with twitter are also really interesting startup opportunities: Search in content linked from twitter, ranked by your followers and same destination of URL-shorteners; analyze your link-click behavior, show a &#8220;like&#8221; bar on the top after you clicked, and later analyze which of your followees are tweeting the most interesting links; give certain topics or people a rank of importance, and then either color code, display an &#8220;importance bar&#8221;, or plainly filter for importance below your custom threshold &#8220;x&#8221;; &#8230; again the list could go on and on <img src='http://cdixon.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>If only I had more money for funding&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Mougayar</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/09/29/twitter-killed-rss-and-thats-a-bad-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-3474</link>
		<dc:creator>William Mougayar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1284#comment-3474</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s dissapointing to still see headlines like &quot;Twitter killing RSS&quot;. These are 2 very different things. &lt;br&gt;- Twitter has put a dent into the Readers, which were dismal to start with.&lt;br&gt;- RSS and Twitter are symbiotic. You get RSS out of Twitter, RSS feeds Twitter, some sites (like ours) do smart/curated aggregation and send to a Twitter account (e.g. @nyctechnews)&lt;br&gt;- Twitter is great for discovery and general purpose/tech news, but is quite shallow for several other topics (so far)&lt;br&gt;- As Twitter grows, a user will start facing the same issues as with Readers. Instead of managing feeds, we&#039;ll soon be overwhelmed managing people &amp; accounts to follow (although Twitter desktops are getting better, and aggregators again help)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for Twitter being a single point of failure, that&#039;s definitely a current issue they will have to improve upon. Eventually, all statuses will be inter-twinned and transparent to each other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s dissapointing to still see headlines like &#8220;Twitter killing RSS&#8221;. These are 2 very different things. <br />- Twitter has put a dent into the Readers, which were dismal to start with.<br />- RSS and Twitter are symbiotic. You get RSS out of Twitter, RSS feeds Twitter, some sites (like ours) do smart/curated aggregation and send to a Twitter account (e.g. @nyctechnews)<br />- Twitter is great for discovery and general purpose/tech news, but is quite shallow for several other topics (so far)<br />- As Twitter grows, a user will start facing the same issues as with Readers. Instead of managing feeds, we&#39;ll soon be overwhelmed managing people &#038; accounts to follow (although Twitter desktops are getting better, and aggregators again help)</p>
<p>As for Twitter being a single point of failure, that&#39;s definitely a current issue they will have to improve upon. Eventually, all statuses will be inter-twinned and transparent to each other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: parkparadigm</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/09/29/twitter-killed-rss-and-thats-a-bad-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-3462</link>
		<dc:creator>parkparadigm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 05:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1284#comment-3462</guid>
		<description>I agree that Google reader is a pretty crappy user experience. FWIW I use netvibes.  I used to scan my various netvibe tabs religiously a few times a day but now admit that most of my day-to-day &#039;news&#039; is curated via twitter links and RTs.  That said, I still find netvibes (ergo RSS) extremely useful as an archive and when I need to do specific research on an area of interest (as I have collected a great group of expert blogs and newswires there, organized by topic and/or theme.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for twitter, perhaps they should split in two - putting the basic tweet stream into open source (&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;twitter.org&lt;/a&gt;) and focusing commercial entity on add-value services and data monetization.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for the social graph as a barrier to entry, this is obviously true but there are a handful of other companies who could eventually compete here if twitter were to stumble/go evil.  ie Facebook, Skype (if they survive the lawsuit)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that Google reader is a pretty crappy user experience. FWIW I use netvibes.  I used to scan my various netvibe tabs religiously a few times a day but now admit that most of my day-to-day &#39;news&#39; is curated via twitter links and RTs.  That said, I still find netvibes (ergo RSS) extremely useful as an archive and when I need to do specific research on an area of interest (as I have collected a great group of expert blogs and newswires there, organized by topic and/or theme.)</p>
<p>As for twitter, perhaps they should split in two &#8211; putting the basic tweet stream into open source (<a href="http://twitter.org" rel="nofollow">twitter.org</a>) and focusing commercial entity on add-value services and data monetization.  </p>
<p>As for the social graph as a barrier to entry, this is obviously true but there are a handful of other companies who could eventually compete here if twitter were to stumble/go evil.  ie Facebook, Skype (if they survive the lawsuit)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RichardForster</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/09/29/twitter-killed-rss-and-thats-a-bad-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-3461</link>
		<dc:creator>RichardForster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 05:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1284#comment-3461</guid>
		<description>Hi Chris&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is an interesting topic but one I have to disagree with you on.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;RSS isn&#039;t going anywhere, it&#039;s the plumbing and Twitter can&#039;t replace that even with their latest investment round. Sure  Google Reader might be dying but there&#039;s way too much noise on Twitter, it&#039;s too much effort to try and follow a lot of people.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Feedly is the best RSS reader I have come across, those guys rock and what they are doing without major investment is amazing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The biggest problem with RSS is it is not consumer friendly most internet users wouldn&#039;t have clue what RSS is but then most internet users won&#039;t be using Twitter in the way you do to get their news.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It will take a brand to replace the &quot;RSS logo&quot; with some sort of defacto &quot;click this button and you are subscribed so it will appear personalised for you at XXX website&quot; but all that brand will be doing (and it could be Twitter because like you I think they have the brand kudos) is placing it in an RSS reader but average joe won&#039;t care or know that RSS is the plumbing behind it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris</p>
<p>This is an interesting topic but one I have to disagree with you on.</p>
<p>RSS isn&#39;t going anywhere, it&#39;s the plumbing and Twitter can&#39;t replace that even with their latest investment round. Sure  Google Reader might be dying but there&#39;s way too much noise on Twitter, it&#39;s too much effort to try and follow a lot of people.</p>
<p>Feedly is the best RSS reader I have come across, those guys rock and what they are doing without major investment is amazing.</p>
<p>The biggest problem with RSS is it is not consumer friendly most internet users wouldn&#39;t have clue what RSS is but then most internet users won&#39;t be using Twitter in the way you do to get their news.</p>
<p>It will take a brand to replace the &#8220;RSS logo&#8221; with some sort of defacto &#8220;click this button and you are subscribed so it will appear personalised for you at XXX website&#8221; but all that brand will be doing (and it could be Twitter because like you I think they have the brand kudos) is placing it in an RSS reader but average joe won&#39;t care or know that RSS is the plumbing behind it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/09/29/twitter-killed-rss-and-thats-a-bad-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-3460</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 05:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1284#comment-3460</guid>
		<description>Hi, &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is too much saying that twitter killed the rss. rss and twitter are complementary being rss more automatic and twitter more human-made.&lt;br&gt;There are many other microblogging sites coming out, and, it is said, facebook tends to be more like twitter.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Greetings, &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Luis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, </p>
<p>It is too much saying that twitter killed the rss. rss and twitter are complementary being rss more automatic and twitter more human-made.<br />There are many other microblogging sites coming out, and, it is said, facebook tends to be more like twitter.</p>
<p>Greetings, </p>
<p>Luis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slayerboy</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/09/29/twitter-killed-rss-and-thats-a-bad-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-3458</link>
		<dc:creator>slayerboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 04:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1284#comment-3458</guid>
		<description>there is an alternative....called identica.  The problem is twitter is so mainstream now, it&#039;s going to be hard to have any meaningful stuff on identica.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there is an alternative&#8230;.called identica.  The problem is twitter is so mainstream now, it&#39;s going to be hard to have any meaningful stuff on identica.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymouse</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/09/29/twitter-killed-rss-and-thats-a-bad-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-3457</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 04:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1284#comment-3457</guid>
		<description>Twitter is a cluster f*ck. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not sure how a normal person can replace following a few dozen RSS feeds in a reader with Twitter. i.e. read and un-read items, organizing by folder, alphabetical, tags, etc... Definitely not as many people interacting within the reader (just a few friends following and vice versa), but a hell of a lot more engaging and interesting (one person who tweets too much can ruin the entire Twitter experience....but hey, I follow tweets in the my reader)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter is a cluster f*ck. </p>
<p>Not sure how a normal person can replace following a few dozen RSS feeds in a reader with Twitter. i.e. read and un-read items, organizing by folder, alphabetical, tags, etc&#8230; Definitely not as many people interacting within the reader (just a few friends following and vice versa), but a hell of a lot more engaging and interesting (one person who tweets too much can ruin the entire Twitter experience&#8230;.but hey, I follow tweets in the my reader)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevotheclone</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/09/29/twitter-killed-rss-and-thats-a-bad-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-3454</link>
		<dc:creator>kevotheclone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 03:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1284#comment-3454</guid>
		<description>@erangalp readtwit == intersting&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Call me old school, but I still get a lot of value out of Awasu, a highly extensible Windows desktop feed reader.  Awasu gives me Search Agents which monitor incoming feed traffic and Channel Hooks (event driven actions when interesting items are found).  And of course feed items are sticky (@Alex); they won&#039;t drift away on a stream of tweets.  So a &quot;good&quot; feed reader, with a combo of Twitter searches and selected tweeter&#039;s status message feeds make a great way to aggregate twitter content and filter the noise.  And since I don&#039;t travel much (and when I do, the last thing I want to do is touch a keyboard or mouse) a web-based reader isn&#039;t a requirement; Awasu works great for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@erangalp readtwit == intersting</p>
<p>Call me old school, but I still get a lot of value out of Awasu, a highly extensible Windows desktop feed reader.  Awasu gives me Search Agents which monitor incoming feed traffic and Channel Hooks (event driven actions when interesting items are found).  And of course feed items are sticky (@Alex); they won&#39;t drift away on a stream of tweets.  So a &#8220;good&#8221; feed reader, with a combo of Twitter searches and selected tweeter&#39;s status message feeds make a great way to aggregate twitter content and filter the noise.  And since I don&#39;t travel much (and when I do, the last thing I want to do is touch a keyboard or mouse) a web-based reader isn&#39;t a requirement; Awasu works great for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OurielOhayon</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/09/29/twitter-killed-rss-and-thats-a-bad-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-3453</link>
		<dc:creator>OurielOhayon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 03:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1284#comment-3453</guid>
		<description>Although i agree there is an overlap i have 2 issues with killing RSS readers for Twitter. not all the blogs i read have a twitter account and if they do i am not aware of it (idea for a new service?). You need to be in Sync with twitter to keep track of news. Asynchronous reading is not convenient on twitter...and probably too cluttered.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would say that RSS readers as we know them are going to die but there is a definite need for a simple reader enabling asynchronous reading</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although i agree there is an overlap i have 2 issues with killing RSS readers for Twitter. not all the blogs i read have a twitter account and if they do i am not aware of it (idea for a new service?). You need to be in Sync with twitter to keep track of news. Asynchronous reading is not convenient on twitter&#8230;and probably too cluttered.  </p>
<p>I would say that RSS readers as we know them are going to die but there is a definite need for a simple reader enabling asynchronous reading</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elie Seidman</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/09/29/twitter-killed-rss-and-thats-a-bad-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-3452</link>
		<dc:creator>Elie Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 02:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1284#comment-3452</guid>
		<description>I have the same problem with noise that others have mentioned. The signal to noise ratio in twitter is bad relative to the subject headings in my RSS reader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the same problem with noise that others have mentioned. The signal to noise ratio in twitter is bad relative to the subject headings in my RSS reader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.376 seconds -->
<!-- Cached page served by WP-Cache -->

