<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The problem with online “local” businesses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cdixon.org/2009/10/02/the-problem-with-online-local-businesses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/02/the-problem-with-online-local-businesses/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 08:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Groupon Should Take Google’s Money And Run &#124; Lombok Medianet</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/02/the-problem-with-online-local-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-11768</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Groupon Should Take Google’s Money And Run &#124; Lombok Medianet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 02:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1316#comment-11768</guid>
		<description>[...] Here&#8217;s the first thing I thought when I heard that price: &#8220;What? But Skype sold for $2.6 billion and it was a completely game-changing technology! This is group coupons.&#8221; Leaving aside the fact that eBay bought Skype in 2005 and use of the web by people with purchasing power all over the globe has exploded since then, the simple fact is that the price makes sense if Google will get that kind of value from it. Well, $5.3 billion is too hefty a chunk of change for me to put money on, but since they are, let&#8217;s assume they will. Google has historically been weak in local, and Groupon will plug that hole nicely. Per Kara Swisher: &#8220;It will move the search giant instantly to the top spot in local commerce online and give it huge troves of data about consumer buying habits and merchant information across the globe.&#8221; Groupon is a company beloved by so-called Normals (its name alone is so genius on that score), but importantly it also brings local businesses to their local, online audience &#8212; historically a challenge. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Here&#8217;s the first thing I thought when I heard that price: &#8220;What? But Skype sold for $2.6 billion and it was a completely game-changing technology! This is group coupons.&#8221; Leaving aside the fact that eBay bought Skype in 2005 and use of the web by people with purchasing power all over the globe has exploded since then, the simple fact is that the price makes sense if Google will get that kind of value from it. Well, $5.3 billion is too hefty a chunk of change for me to put money on, but since they are, let&#8217;s assume they will. Google has historically been weak in local, and Groupon will plug that hole nicely. Per Kara Swisher: &#8220;It will move the search giant instantly to the top spot in local commerce online and give it huge troves of data about consumer buying habits and merchant information across the globe.&#8221; Groupon is a company beloved by so-called Normals (its name alone is so genius on that score), but importantly it also brings local businesses to their local, online audience &mdash; historically a challenge. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Location Based Blogging: A Revenue Model &#124; Josh Clemence</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/02/the-problem-with-online-local-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-11506</link>
		<dc:creator>Location Based Blogging: A Revenue Model &#124; Josh Clemence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1316#comment-11506</guid>
		<description>[...] past weekend I read a Chris Dixon post, &#8220;The Problem With Online &#8216;Local&#8217; Businesses.&#8221; The post was more than a year old, but still struck me as informing and I felt like it still [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] past weekend I read a Chris Dixon post, &#8220;The Problem With Online &#8216;Local&#8217; Businesses.&#8221; The post was more than a year old, but still struck me as informing and I felt like it still [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Some thoughts on the &#8220;geo stack&#8221; cdixon.org &#8211; chris dixon&#39;s blog</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/02/the-problem-with-online-local-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-6901</link>
		<dc:creator>Some thoughts on the &#8220;geo stack&#8221; cdixon.org &#8211; chris dixon&#39;s blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 18:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1316#comment-6901</guid>
		<description>[...] least) two parts to monetizing location. Getting local businesses to embrace the internet has been very slow going. Companies that make money on local businesses today (Yelp, Yext, ReachLocal) use expensive [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] least) two parts to monetizing location. Getting local businesses to embrace the internet has been very slow going. Companies that make money on local businesses today (Yelp, Yext, ReachLocal) use expensive [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Real-Time Rewards &#171; Eric Stromberg&#39;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/02/the-problem-with-online-local-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-6598</link>
		<dc:creator>Real-Time Rewards &#171; Eric Stromberg&#39;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 19:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1316#comment-6598</guid>
		<description>[...] followed only later by &#8220;mom and pop&#8221; shops. As Chris Dixon recently pointed out on his blog: The problem is that, for the most part, these local business either don’t think of the web as an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] followed only later by &#8220;mom and pop&#8221; shops. As Chris Dixon recently pointed out on his blog: The problem is that, for the most part, these local business either don’t think of the web as an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcos Polanco</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/02/the-problem-with-online-local-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-5775</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcos Polanco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 21:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1316#comment-5775</guid>
		<description>Google Goggles is the game changer here. To take the point of restaurants, you&#039;d better believe owners will get religion when they see families &quot;goggling&quot; in front of their establishment and choosing accordingly. The &quot;drop dead simple&quot; CRM is certainly the way to go, but critically it will largely be under the control of the &quot;C&quot; in CRM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Goggles is the game changer here. To take the point of restaurants, you&#39;d better believe owners will get religion when they see families &#8220;goggling&#8221; in front of their establishment and choosing accordingly. The &#8220;drop dead simple&#8221; CRM is certainly the way to go, but critically it will largely be under the control of the &#8220;C&#8221; in CRM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcos Polanco</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/02/the-problem-with-online-local-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-5347</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcos Polanco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 13:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1316#comment-5347</guid>
		<description>Google Goggles is the game changer here. To take the point of restaurants, you&#039;d better believe owners will get religion when they see families &quot;goggling&quot; in front of their establishment and choosing accordingly. The &quot;drop dead simple&quot; CRM is certainly the way to go, but critically it will largely be under the control of the &quot;C&quot; in CRM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Goggles is the game changer here. To take the point of restaurants, you&#39;d better believe owners will get religion when they see families &#8220;goggling&#8221; in front of their establishment and choosing accordingly. The &#8220;drop dead simple&#8221; CRM is certainly the way to go, but critically it will largely be under the control of the &#8220;C&#8221; in CRM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/02/the-problem-with-online-local-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-4836</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1316#comment-4836</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Is Twitter Effective For Small Business Owners?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Can Twitter be effective for small business owners? It really just depends, but for most small business owners the answer is no. Small business is typically defined as smaller than $50 million in annual revenue. If that is the criteria, then the higher...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Is Twitter Effective For Small Business Owners?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Can Twitter be effective for small business owners? It really just depends, but for most small business owners the answer is no. Small business is typically defined as smaller than $50 million in annual revenue. If that is the criteria, then the higher&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brooksjordan</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/02/the-problem-with-online-local-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-4822</link>
		<dc:creator>brooksjordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1316#comment-4822</guid>
		<description>I met with the CEO of an SMB last week with about 20 locations and $35M in revenue. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He said ReachLocal has been delivering him about 400 phone calls a month, about half of which became paying customers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You should have seen his face light up. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And on top of that, he was using all of those recorded calls to do trainings with his employees. He visits one of this stores, pulls out his laptop in the conference room and goes through the calls with the employees there.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It seemed like a great example to me of &quot;online local&quot; coming into focus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I met with the CEO of an SMB last week with about 20 locations and $35M in revenue. </p>
<p>He said ReachLocal has been delivering him about 400 phone calls a month, about half of which became paying customers.</p>
<p>You should have seen his face light up. </p>
<p>And on top of that, he was using all of those recorded calls to do trainings with his employees. He visits one of this stores, pulls out his laptop in the conference room and goes through the calls with the employees there.</p>
<p>It seemed like a great example to me of &#8220;online local&#8221; coming into focus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: donaabo</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/02/the-problem-with-online-local-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-4553</link>
		<dc:creator>donaabo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 02:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1316#comment-4553</guid>
		<description>Local is tough, tis true. Our project (focused on local staycations and requiring participation from activity providers AKA small service businesses) has a longer than anticipated sales-cycle for signing up businesses. Primarily providers only sign up when the promise of &#039;FREE&#039; meets the potential for &#039;UNLIMITED NEW BUSINESS WITH ZERO OPERATIONAL HEADACHE&#039;. This is a hard pitch to make, but frankly, is what technology is all about. Changing the good old paradigm is still why most of us participate - and Local is one of the last challenges the big boys struggle with - partially by virtue of who they are (wink, wink).&lt;br&gt;In either case I don&#039;t believe local will be solved by a quickly scalable approach (we&#039;ve tried - as has many others) - it will require significant investment and patience beyond most fb/twtr-infused investors attention spans. There are two shining examples other than Yelp that have taken an incredible (and I&#039;d dare - more sustainable) shot at this. The old dog is Chuck Templetons &lt;a href=&quot;http://Opentable.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Opentable.com&lt;/a&gt; that finally managed an IPO earlier this year - and is still not given valuations like google, but run a good, healthy bricks&#039;n&#039;mortar business as a service provider to restaurants. Sure it took time, but they were in the game long before Saas was even an acronym. The other is Andrew Masons GroupOn, spin-off from the brilliant, but hardly monetizable &lt;a href=&quot;http://Thepoint.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Thepoint.com&lt;/a&gt;. Both found ways to create significant value for the local business AND the consumer - and thus are paving the way for a) acceptance in the small business community and b) investors re-ignited interest in and appreciation of the potential in local.&lt;br&gt;And - of course - let&#039;s not forget that Facebook, Twitter and before them - the dear boys at the Google-plex were there to open the door to local in the first place  - and further back 10-12 years ago - the onlinization of yellowpages by Citysearch, Digital cities, etc.Thanks to those early days SMBs today understands the power of online, oh, but they do! &lt;br&gt;They are simply waiting for someone to show the right path forward.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I do believe that&#039;s a challenge lending itself quite nicely to visionaries, fools and entrepreneurs in general!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Local is tough, tis true. Our project (focused on local staycations and requiring participation from activity providers AKA small service businesses) has a longer than anticipated sales-cycle for signing up businesses. Primarily providers only sign up when the promise of &#39;FREE&#39; meets the potential for &#39;UNLIMITED NEW BUSINESS WITH ZERO OPERATIONAL HEADACHE&#39;. This is a hard pitch to make, but frankly, is what technology is all about. Changing the good old paradigm is still why most of us participate &#8211; and Local is one of the last challenges the big boys struggle with &#8211; partially by virtue of who they are (wink, wink).<br />In either case I don&#39;t believe local will be solved by a quickly scalable approach (we&#39;ve tried &#8211; as has many others) &#8211; it will require significant investment and patience beyond most fb/twtr-infused investors attention spans. There are two shining examples other than Yelp that have taken an incredible (and I&#39;d dare &#8211; more sustainable) shot at this. The old dog is Chuck Templetons <a href="http://Opentable.com" rel="nofollow">Opentable.com</a> that finally managed an IPO earlier this year &#8211; and is still not given valuations like google, but run a good, healthy bricks&#39;n&#39;mortar business as a service provider to restaurants. Sure it took time, but they were in the game long before Saas was even an acronym. The other is Andrew Masons GroupOn, spin-off from the brilliant, but hardly monetizable <a href="http://Thepoint.com" rel="nofollow">Thepoint.com</a>. Both found ways to create significant value for the local business AND the consumer &#8211; and thus are paving the way for a) acceptance in the small business community and b) investors re-ignited interest in and appreciation of the potential in local.<br />And &#8211; of course &#8211; let&#39;s not forget that Facebook, Twitter and before them &#8211; the dear boys at the Google-plex were there to open the door to local in the first place  &#8211; and further back 10-12 years ago &#8211; the onlinization of yellowpages by Citysearch, Digital cities, etc.Thanks to those early days SMBs today understands the power of online, oh, but they do! <br />They are simply waiting for someone to show the right path forward.</p>
<p>I do believe that&#39;s a challenge lending itself quite nicely to visionaries, fools and entrepreneurs in general!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethan Anderson</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/02/the-problem-with-online-local-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-4227</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethan Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 20:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1316#comment-4227</guid>
		<description>By the way, 45 percent of small businesses operate Facebook pages and 46 percent have presence on Twitter! More evidence they are NOT as unsophisticated as you think. &lt;a href=&quot;http://bit.ly/15Roj8&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://bit.ly/15Roj8&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, 45 percent of small businesses operate Facebook pages and 46 percent have presence on Twitter! More evidence they are NOT as unsophisticated as you think. <a href="http://bit.ly/15Roj8" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/15Roj8</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler Willis</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/02/the-problem-with-online-local-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-4083</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler Willis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 01:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1316#comment-4083</guid>
		<description>Hey Chris,  I wrote about my take on this for MediaPost after SXSW: &lt;a href=&quot;http://bit.ly/mpfoursquare&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://bit.ly/mpfoursquare&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s a little over half a year old, but still valid in my mind. I still contend that this is the right business model for them (use the badges as promotional incentives that solve the model of &quot;proving&quot; people went to the venue), I&#039;d also note that most small business owners like to ask &quot;how do I know that person wasn&#039;t gonna come in here anyway&quot; which could be answered by analyzing user history.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My belief that 4[] has a good market opportunity in front of them doesn&#039;t make the argument that local is rife with problems any less valid.  If you don&#039;t have an innovative approach that is going to solve the problem of acquisition and retention, you should just hand your investors their money back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Chris,  I wrote about my take on this for MediaPost after SXSW: <a href="http://bit.ly/mpfoursquare" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/mpfoursquare</a></p>
<p>It&#39;s a little over half a year old, but still valid in my mind. I still contend that this is the right business model for them (use the badges as promotional incentives that solve the model of &#8220;proving&#8221; people went to the venue), I&#39;d also note that most small business owners like to ask &#8220;how do I know that person wasn&#39;t gonna come in here anyway&#8221; which could be answered by analyzing user history.</p>
<p>My belief that 4[] has a good market opportunity in front of them doesn&#39;t make the argument that local is rife with problems any less valid.  If you don&#39;t have an innovative approach that is going to solve the problem of acquisition and retention, you should just hand your investors their money back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler Willis</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/02/the-problem-with-online-local-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-4081</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler Willis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 01:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1316#comment-4081</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m really interested in this space, would love to learn about both urban radar and hungry garden.  &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:willis.tyler@gmail.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;willis.tyler@gmail.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m really interested in this space, would love to learn about both urban radar and hungry garden.  <a href="mailto:willis.tyler@gmail.com" rel="nofollow">willis.tyler@gmail.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The problem with online “local” businesses &#124; Igniting Startups - nPost</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/02/the-problem-with-online-local-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-3765</link>
		<dc:creator>The problem with online “local” businesses &#124; Igniting Startups - nPost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 19:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1316#comment-3765</guid>
		<description>[...] From cdixon.org [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] From cdixon.org [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Local marketing on the web - the next big thing?</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/02/the-problem-with-online-local-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-3761</link>
		<dc:creator>Local marketing on the web - the next big thing?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1316#comment-3761</guid>
		<description>[...] Dixon&#8217;s, blog post &#8220;The problem with online “local” businesses&#8221; summarizes my reality: The problem is that, for the most part, these local business either [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dixon&#8217;s, blog post &#8220;The problem with online “local” businesses&#8221; summarizes my reality: The problem is that, for the most part, these local business either [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hometowntimes</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/02/the-problem-with-online-local-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-3764</link>
		<dc:creator>hometowntimes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 15:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1316#comment-3764</guid>
		<description>Being able to aggregate revenue nationally, and from national brand companies that don&#039;t have the attrition rate at the local level that independents have, is a model that works.  That&#039;s why &lt;a href=&quot;http://Hometowntimes.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Hometowntimes.com&lt;/a&gt; is a successful franchise system, leveraging a national footprint, but adding value to the local community, advertisers, and publishers.   This extends beyond advertising to also answer, &quot;What&#039;s next for local news?&quot;, which is better solved with what&#039;s next for the community, as well. The correct business model, particularly online, needs to address the career path for the local publisher as well as the content of relevance to both community, readership, and advertisers - local and national brand trying to reach their local customers. Delivery of news, and even great journalism can then be supported and thrive within that context. At &lt;a href=&quot;http://hometowntimes.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;hometowntimes.com&lt;/a&gt;, we chose a franchise business model to present a proven news site format, combined with the business opportunity for either editors, reporters, or local businesses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being able to aggregate revenue nationally, and from national brand companies that don&#39;t have the attrition rate at the local level that independents have, is a model that works.  That&#39;s why <a href="http://Hometowntimes.com" rel="nofollow">Hometowntimes.com</a> is a successful franchise system, leveraging a national footprint, but adding value to the local community, advertisers, and publishers.   This extends beyond advertising to also answer, &#8220;What&#39;s next for local news?&#8221;, which is better solved with what&#39;s next for the community, as well. The correct business model, particularly online, needs to address the career path for the local publisher as well as the content of relevance to both community, readership, and advertisers &#8211; local and national brand trying to reach their local customers. Delivery of news, and even great journalism can then be supported and thrive within that context. At <a href="http://hometowntimes.com" rel="nofollow">hometowntimes.com</a>, we chose a franchise business model to present a proven news site format, combined with the business opportunity for either editors, reporters, or local businesses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ethananderson</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/02/the-problem-with-online-local-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-3746</link>
		<dc:creator>ethananderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 23:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1316#comment-3746</guid>
		<description>Chris, I think this is changing faster than you&#039;re giving local businesses credit for, and that it is possible to make money in local with the right product and business model.  Of course I&#039;m biased, but consider these two facts.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;First, the penetration of digital/online media has now exceeded that of traditional media among small and medium-sized business advertisers for the first time.  Penetration of digital/online media increased from 73 percent in August 2008 to 77 percent in August 2009 (Source: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foxbusiness.com/story/penetration-online-media-surpasses-traditional-media-time-small-business/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.foxbusiness.com/story/penetration-on...&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Secondly, consider ServiceMagic, which most people in the industry agree is a poor experience for consumers and service providers alike.  Consumers get called (and sometimes harassed) by multiple service providers who paid $50 for the lead.  Since ServiceMagic generally sends the lead to 3 providers, they clean up with $150 in revenue while (at least) 2 of the 3 providers are left holding the bag.  ServiceMagic is doing 100x the revenue of Yelp per user.   My estimate from the IAC 10Q is that they&#039;re making $60/user and making about $148M in revenue/year.  Also, despite the recession, ServiceMagic is on track to grow about 14% this year (Source: &lt;a href=&quot;http://ir.iac.com/secfiling.cfm?filingID=1047469-09-7368&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://ir.iac.com/secfiling.cfm?filingID=104746...&lt;/a&gt;).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, I think this is changing faster than you&#39;re giving local businesses credit for, and that it is possible to make money in local with the right product and business model.  Of course I&#39;m biased, but consider these two facts.</p>
<p>First, the penetration of digital/online media has now exceeded that of traditional media among small and medium-sized business advertisers for the first time.  Penetration of digital/online media increased from 73 percent in August 2008 to 77 percent in August 2009 (Source: <a href="http://www.foxbusiness.com/story/penetration-online-media-surpasses-traditional-media-time-small-business/" rel="nofollow">http://www.foxbusiness.com/story/penetration-on&#8230;</a>).</p>
<p>Secondly, consider ServiceMagic, which most people in the industry agree is a poor experience for consumers and service providers alike.  Consumers get called (and sometimes harassed) by multiple service providers who paid $50 for the lead.  Since ServiceMagic generally sends the lead to 3 providers, they clean up with $150 in revenue while (at least) 2 of the 3 providers are left holding the bag.  ServiceMagic is doing 100x the revenue of Yelp per user.   My estimate from the IAC 10Q is that they&#39;re making $60/user and making about $148M in revenue/year.  Also, despite the recession, ServiceMagic is on track to grow about 14% this year (Source: <a href="http://ir.iac.com/secfiling.cfm?filingID=1047469-09-7368" rel="nofollow">http://ir.iac.com/secfiling.cfm?filingID=104746&#8230;</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: restaurantzoom</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/02/the-problem-with-online-local-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-3713</link>
		<dc:creator>restaurantzoom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 08:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1316#comment-3713</guid>
		<description>We find that with restaurateurs there is a learning curve involved like one would expect. There seems to be a lot of confusion out there. Also, they are constantly bombarded by salespeople who are arrogant as well as ignorant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We find that with restaurateurs there is a learning curve involved like one would expect. There seems to be a lot of confusion out there. Also, they are constantly bombarded by salespeople who are arrogant as well as ignorant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryangraves</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/02/the-problem-with-online-local-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-3695</link>
		<dc:creator>ryangraves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 00:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1316#comment-3695</guid>
		<description>I totally agree. Venues could pay for badges to give out. Customers  &lt;br&gt;who get those badges could get deals.&lt;br&gt;Great idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree. Venues could pay for badges to give out. Customers  <br />who get those badges could get deals.<br />Great idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Puckett</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/02/the-problem-with-online-local-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-3692</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Puckett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 23:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1316#comment-3692</guid>
		<description>Jeff:  I am working on a &#039;geosocial&#039; web applications that I believe leverages twitter and facebook exactly as you describe in your post.  I could not find Urban Radar in a Google Search.  I would love to read more about your research or project and share information about Hungry Garden.  &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:Help@hungrygarden.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Help@hungrygarden.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff:  I am working on a &#39;geosocial&#39; web applications that I believe leverages twitter and facebook exactly as you describe in your post.  I could not find Urban Radar in a Google Search.  I would love to read more about your research or project and share information about Hungry Garden.  <a href="mailto:Help@hungrygarden.com" rel="nofollow">Help@hungrygarden.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShanaC</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/02/the-problem-with-online-local-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-3688</link>
		<dc:creator>ShanaC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 19:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1316#comment-3688</guid>
		<description>I really honestly don&#039;t think for foursquare that&#039;s the end goal.  One of the most innovative parts of FourSquare is that there are essentially badges being given out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Who says the badges have to be tied to anything in particular in the points system?  What about secondary badge markets?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really honestly don&#39;t think for foursquare that&#39;s the end goal.  One of the most innovative parts of FourSquare is that there are essentially badges being given out.</p>
<p>Who says the badges have to be tied to anything in particular in the points system?  What about secondary badge markets?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg4</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/02/the-problem-with-online-local-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-3687</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 18:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1316#comment-3687</guid>
		<description>Yeah, seems like businesses with highly perishable inventory and customers open to booking online are a no-brainer in hindsight.  The local dry cleaner or clothing store should be a much harder sell.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Local services (e.g., nail salon, massage therapist) probably make more sense online with something like time-based specials to fill open capacity, but it would be hard to tell whether you&#039;re really attracting incremental customers or just making people time-shift to cheaper periods and hurting your profitability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, seems like businesses with highly perishable inventory and customers open to booking online are a no-brainer in hindsight.  The local dry cleaner or clothing store should be a much harder sell.  </p>
<p>Local services (e.g., nail salon, massage therapist) probably make more sense online with something like time-based specials to fill open capacity, but it would be hard to tell whether you&#39;re really attracting incremental customers or just making people time-shift to cheaper periods and hurting your profitability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShanaC</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/02/the-problem-with-online-local-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-3682</link>
		<dc:creator>ShanaC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 16:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1316#comment-3682</guid>
		<description>Certain things aren&#039;t hardware- you are mentioning OpenTable, yet my favorite cafe is self-seating.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All of this is a huge pyschological shift as well.  One of the reasons there can be huge amounts of churn in hyper-local businesses is that hyper-local businesses are relationship businesses: they are can be as much dependent on technical skills that have to be displayed well as they are dependent on technologies.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Craft local jobs have to be cultivated and displayed, it&#039;s one of the major reasons there is churn.  I don&#039;t, and no one I know, judges a dry cleaner purely on when I get a shirt back...It&#039;s whether the owner is nice, and if the shirt is pressed correctly with no stains, in a convenient location to what I need to do, and priced correctly.  Perhaps it would be nice to be text messaged about picking up my shirts, or that the other guy press shirts for a somewhat cheaper price.  At the end of the day, I&#039;m still particular about the men shirts I &quot;borrow&quot; to wear as tunics over dresses, or my women&#039;s dress shirts that I get from Jcrew, and who&#039;s handling them.  Convenience is not the only triumph here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Certain things aren&#39;t hardware- you are mentioning OpenTable, yet my favorite cafe is self-seating.</p>
<p>All of this is a huge pyschological shift as well.  One of the reasons there can be huge amounts of churn in hyper-local businesses is that hyper-local businesses are relationship businesses: they are can be as much dependent on technical skills that have to be displayed well as they are dependent on technologies.</p>
<p>Craft local jobs have to be cultivated and displayed, it&#39;s one of the major reasons there is churn.  I don&#39;t, and no one I know, judges a dry cleaner purely on when I get a shirt back&#8230;It&#39;s whether the owner is nice, and if the shirt is pressed correctly with no stains, in a convenient location to what I need to do, and priced correctly.  Perhaps it would be nice to be text messaged about picking up my shirts, or that the other guy press shirts for a somewhat cheaper price.  At the end of the day, I&#39;m still particular about the men shirts I &#8220;borrow&#8221; to wear as tunics over dresses, or my women&#39;s dress shirts that I get from Jcrew, and who&#39;s handling them.  Convenience is not the only triumph here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShanaC</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/02/the-problem-with-online-local-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-3681</link>
		<dc:creator>ShanaC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 16:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1316#comment-3681</guid>
		<description>Honestly, I think this is true for every business.  What business wants to just advertise?  That would be strange.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, I think this is true for every business.  What business wants to just advertise?  That would be strange.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShanaC</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/02/the-problem-with-online-local-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-3680</link>
		<dc:creator>ShanaC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 16:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1316#comment-3680</guid>
		<description>I just was talking to someone about GroupOn and the relationship it is having to his local Business (&lt;a href=&quot;http://IWish.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;IWish.com&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Both of you are on the mark, it is very clear that all of these newer services have to be very clearly driven by good understandings of local metrics.  And those are very different than say national metrics.&lt;br&gt;One of the reasons something like Groupon works is that a SMB knows how many people bought the coupon for Groupon.  Their is a minimum starting point for that churn to measure against.  Most businesses don&#039;t even get that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just was talking to someone about GroupOn and the relationship it is having to his local Business (<a href="http://IWish.com" rel="nofollow">IWish.com</a>)</p>
<p>Both of you are on the mark, it is very clear that all of these newer services have to be very clearly driven by good understandings of local metrics.  And those are very different than say national metrics.<br />One of the reasons something like Groupon works is that a SMB knows how many people bought the coupon for Groupon.  Their is a minimum starting point for that churn to measure against.  Most businesses don&#39;t even get that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulbaudisch</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/02/the-problem-with-online-local-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-3673</link>
		<dc:creator>paulbaudisch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 13:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1316#comment-3673</guid>
		<description>Local SMBs don&#039;t want to advertise online.  What they do want is leads and sales from the online channel.  The difference is huge.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;ReachLocal, Yodle and the online yellow pages enable small businesses to more easily spend money to advertise online.  But they simply drive traffic to SMB Web pages that aren&#039;t designed to convert that traffic into leads and sales.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Those services fall short because they don&#039;t directly help SMBs generate prospects and sales.  And that&#039;s why ReachLocal et. al. have the churn problems they do.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Until our industry makes directions connections between the online channel and SMBs&#039; cash flow, &quot;online local&quot; will remain illusory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Local SMBs don&#39;t want to advertise online.  What they do want is leads and sales from the online channel.  The difference is huge.</p>
<p>ReachLocal, Yodle and the online yellow pages enable small businesses to more easily spend money to advertise online.  But they simply drive traffic to SMB Web pages that aren&#39;t designed to convert that traffic into leads and sales.</p>
<p>Those services fall short because they don&#39;t directly help SMBs generate prospects and sales.  And that&#39;s why ReachLocal et. al. have the churn problems they do.</p>
<p>Until our industry makes directions connections between the online channel and SMBs&#39; cash flow, &#8220;online local&#8221; will remain illusory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RichardForster</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/02/the-problem-with-online-local-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-3650</link>
		<dc:creator>RichardForster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 07:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1316#comment-3650</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure its so hard, the small hotel industry was in that situation in early 2000, they embraced online booking pretty quickly and adopted supplier-side micro-payments alongside.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m not sure its so hard, the small hotel industry was in that situation in early 2000, they embraced online booking pretty quickly and adopted supplier-side micro-payments alongside.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RichardForster</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/02/the-problem-with-online-local-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-3649</link>
		<dc:creator>RichardForster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 06:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1316#comment-3649</guid>
		<description>Mobile is definitely going to be where it&#039;s at as far as getting local business to embrace online technology.  Much of the local economy is based on impulse purchase and the transactions are of a far more personal nature between the business and the consumer than the average internet transaction.  Mobile fits that type of transaction far better than pc.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don&#039;t think local business will be slow to embrace a technology once they see competitors and peers actually benefiting from it.  If someone produces a killer app (the likes of foursquare are probably a good staring point) that produces tangible visible benefits to the small business owner then they&#039;ll jump on it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We have several nightclub and bar clients that broadcast offers by sms on a given evening to try and drive traffic into their venues.  Whilst the strategy works quite well the problem is that it is not location based.  It would be far more effective if it was targeted at people who were actually out in the area of the venue on that particular evening and who were open to receiving a voucher for a free drink or entry to a club.  There may already be an app for that but if there isn&#039;t .....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mobile is definitely going to be where it&#39;s at as far as getting local business to embrace online technology.  Much of the local economy is based on impulse purchase and the transactions are of a far more personal nature between the business and the consumer than the average internet transaction.  Mobile fits that type of transaction far better than pc.</p>
<p>I don&#39;t think local business will be slow to embrace a technology once they see competitors and peers actually benefiting from it.  If someone produces a killer app (the likes of foursquare are probably a good staring point) that produces tangible visible benefits to the small business owner then they&#39;ll jump on it.</p>
<p>We have several nightclub and bar clients that broadcast offers by sms on a given evening to try and drive traffic into their venues.  Whilst the strategy works quite well the problem is that it is not location based.  It would be far more effective if it was targeted at people who were actually out in the area of the venue on that particular evening and who were open to receiving a voucher for a free drink or entry to a club.  There may already be an app for that but if there isn&#39;t &#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryangraves</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/02/the-problem-with-online-local-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-3639</link>
		<dc:creator>ryangraves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 00:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1316#comment-3639</guid>
		<description>The money for foursquare may come from the packaging and licensing of  &lt;br&gt;that data.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hypothetical:&lt;br&gt;A bar could find out what other bars they are most directly in  &lt;br&gt;competition with. What specials and menu items are working for  &lt;br&gt;competitors would extremely valuabe. This type of actionable info just  &lt;br&gt;doesn&#039;t exist yet.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Then bars could reach out to people who have attended there  &lt;br&gt;competitors but not yet attended their establishment.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is just the bar/retaraunt example... I believe there are many  &lt;br&gt;more verticles that foursquare could be a major player.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The money for foursquare may come from the packaging and licensing of  <br />that data.</p>
<p>Hypothetical:<br />A bar could find out what other bars they are most directly in  <br />competition with. What specials and menu items are working for  <br />competitors would extremely valuabe. This type of actionable info just  <br />doesn&#39;t exist yet.</p>
<p>Then bars could reach out to people who have attended there  <br />competitors but not yet attended their establishment.</p>
<p>This is just the bar/retaraunt example&#8230; I believe there are many  <br />more verticles that foursquare could be a major player.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/02/the-problem-with-online-local-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-3637</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 23:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1316#comment-3637</guid>
		<description>In your example, it sounds like a significant use of manpower and resources for a small restaurant to monitor all customers - for a marginal gain in profit.  Would foursquare then receive a portion of that increased price of food?  If so, the marginal gain in profit for the restaurant decreases that much more, further resulting in a decreased incentive to monitor and predict customer actions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I understand the value of providing customer demographics and information.  However, in the case of foursquare, the customers using foursquare are frequent customers that the establishments are aware of anyway - meaning they understand that demographic already.  Where&#039;s the value in receiving information about what they already know?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think foursquare is a fascinating business that is leading the charge of connecting the online and offline worlds.  However, I have yet to hear a legitimate revenue model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In your example, it sounds like a significant use of manpower and resources for a small restaurant to monitor all customers &#8211; for a marginal gain in profit.  Would foursquare then receive a portion of that increased price of food?  If so, the marginal gain in profit for the restaurant decreases that much more, further resulting in a decreased incentive to monitor and predict customer actions.</p>
<p>I understand the value of providing customer demographics and information.  However, in the case of foursquare, the customers using foursquare are frequent customers that the establishments are aware of anyway &#8211; meaning they understand that demographic already.  Where&#39;s the value in receiving information about what they already know?</p>
<p>I think foursquare is a fascinating business that is leading the charge of connecting the online and offline worlds.  However, I have yet to hear a legitimate revenue model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryangraves</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/02/the-problem-with-online-local-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-3635</link>
		<dc:creator>ryangraves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 22:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1316#comment-3635</guid>
		<description>If a bar or restraraunt had my food or drinks ready when I arrived I&#039;d  &lt;br&gt;pay extra, staying in tune with my check-ins or tweets they could  &lt;br&gt;provide that.&lt;br&gt;The key is what could a venue do with information that would provide  &lt;br&gt;more value to the customer (that they would PAY for)&lt;br&gt;Similar to Twitter the obvious path for foursquare is to license that  &lt;br&gt;info to businesses</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If a bar or restraraunt had my food or drinks ready when I arrived I&#39;d  <br />pay extra, staying in tune with my check-ins or tweets they could  <br />provide that.<br />The key is what could a venue do with information that would provide  <br />more value to the customer (that they would PAY for)<br />Similar to Twitter the obvious path for foursquare is to license that  <br />info to businesses</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veer Digital &#8211; Relevant News &#124; Veer Digital</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/02/the-problem-with-online-local-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-3622</link>
		<dc:creator>Veer Digital &#8211; Relevant News &#124; Veer Digital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 22:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1316#comment-3622</guid>
		<description>[...] The problem with online “local” businesses [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The problem with online “local” businesses [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veer Digital &#8211; Relevant News &#124; Veer Digital</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/02/the-problem-with-online-local-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-3623</link>
		<dc:creator>Veer Digital &#8211; Relevant News &#124; Veer Digital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 22:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1316#comment-3623</guid>
		<description>[...] The problem with online “local” businesses [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The problem with online “local” businesses [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veer Digital &#8211; Relevant News &#124; Veer Digital</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/02/the-problem-with-online-local-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-3624</link>
		<dc:creator>Veer Digital &#8211; Relevant News &#124; Veer Digital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 22:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1316#comment-3624</guid>
		<description>[...] The problem with online “local” businesses [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The problem with online “local” businesses [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veer Digital &#8211; Relevant News &#124; Veer Digital</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/02/the-problem-with-online-local-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-3625</link>
		<dc:creator>Veer Digital &#8211; Relevant News &#124; Veer Digital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 22:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1316#comment-3625</guid>
		<description>[...] The problem with online “local” businesses [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The problem with online “local” businesses [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris dixon</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/02/the-problem-with-online-local-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-3634</link>
		<dc:creator>chris dixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 21:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1316#comment-3634</guid>
		<description>very interesting.  thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very interesting.  thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nikiscevak</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/02/the-problem-with-online-local-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-3633</link>
		<dc:creator>nikiscevak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 21:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1316#comment-3633</guid>
		<description>Completely agree with everything in the post but Yodle and ReachLocal aren&#039;t killing it. They churn through customers every year. Your 40% is actually conservative. Here is a report that estimates 80% annual churn: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.clickable.com/Corp/ContactUs.aspx?qType=Download+Local+Advertising+Report&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.clickable.com/Corp/ContactUs.aspx?qT...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On Yext, it&#039;s the college kids making the calls: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.yext.com/recruiting/sales/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.yext.com/recruiting/sales/&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Completely agree with everything in the post but Yodle and ReachLocal aren&#39;t killing it. They churn through customers every year. Your 40% is actually conservative. Here is a report that estimates 80% annual churn: <a href="http://www.clickable.com/Corp/ContactUs.aspx?qType=Download+Local+Advertising+Report" rel="nofollow">http://www.clickable.com/Corp/ContactUs.aspx?qT&#8230;</a></p>
<p>On Yext, it&#39;s the college kids making the calls: <a href="http://www.yext.com/recruiting/sales/" rel="nofollow">http://www.yext.com/recruiting/sales/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Pearlstein</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/02/the-problem-with-online-local-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-3629</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Pearlstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 20:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1316#comment-3629</guid>
		<description>It will be years before local advertising moves online - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.crosstargeting.com/why-do-the-yellow-pages-still-dwarf-google/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.crosstargeting.com/why-do-the-yellow...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will be years before local advertising moves online &#8211; <a href="http://www.crosstargeting.com/why-do-the-yellow-pages-still-dwarf-google/" rel="nofollow">http://www.crosstargeting.com/why-do-the-yellow&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vinicius Vacanti</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/02/the-problem-with-online-local-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-3627</link>
		<dc:creator>Vinicius Vacanti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 20:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1316#comment-3627</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s really hard for local businesses to understand the worth of a click on their website because that click isn&#039;t tracked to the person&#039;s eventual in-store consumption.  One way to address this is to make consumers pay for things online and just pick them up offline.  Then, biz owners would know exactly what clicks were worth and be willing to pay for them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One way we are seeing this happen is the quickly growing number of sites getting consumers to buy coupons online for offline local transactions (see &lt;a href=&quot;http://groupon.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;groupon.com&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://livingsocial.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;livingsocial.com&lt;/a&gt;).  They aren&#039;t revolutionizing the local industry overnight but it&#039;s a step in the right direction.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Other sources of local affiliate links are sites like &lt;a href=&quot;http://restaurant.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;restaurant.com&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://seamlessweb.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;seamlessweb.com&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://opentable.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;opentable.com&lt;/a&gt;.  If people know of others, we would love to hear about them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s really hard for local businesses to understand the worth of a click on their website because that click isn&#39;t tracked to the person&#39;s eventual in-store consumption.  One way to address this is to make consumers pay for things online and just pick them up offline.  Then, biz owners would know exactly what clicks were worth and be willing to pay for them.</p>
<p>One way we are seeing this happen is the quickly growing number of sites getting consumers to buy coupons online for offline local transactions (see <a href="http://groupon.com" rel="nofollow">groupon.com</a>, <a href="http://livingsocial.com" rel="nofollow">livingsocial.com</a>).  They aren&#39;t revolutionizing the local industry overnight but it&#39;s a step in the right direction.</p>
<p>Other sources of local affiliate links are sites like <a href="http://restaurant.com" rel="nofollow">restaurant.com</a>, <a href="http://seamlessweb.com" rel="nofollow">seamlessweb.com</a> and <a href="http://opentable.com" rel="nofollow">opentable.com</a>.  If people know of others, we would love to hear about them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: khanan grauer</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/02/the-problem-with-online-local-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-3626</link>
		<dc:creator>khanan grauer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 20:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1316#comment-3626</guid>
		<description>funny. good call</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>funny. good call</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris dixon</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/02/the-problem-with-online-local-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-3620</link>
		<dc:creator>chris dixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 19:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1316#comment-3620</guid>
		<description>yes, from what I can tell they are similar to reachlocal and yodle which are also killing it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;i suspect the home page is a headfake - this is their real business&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.yext.com/yextcalls.jsp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.yext.com/yextcalls.jsp&lt;/a&gt;  which i bet you they promote via robocalls / call center</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, from what I can tell they are similar to reachlocal and yodle which are also killing it.</p>
<p>i suspect the home page is a headfake &#8211; this is their real business<br /><a href="http://www.yext.com/yextcalls.jsp" rel="nofollow">http://www.yext.com/yextcalls.jsp</a>  which i bet you they promote via robocalls / call center</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: khanan grauer</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/02/the-problem-with-online-local-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-3619</link>
		<dc:creator>khanan grauer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 19:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1316#comment-3619</guid>
		<description>don&#039;t know if you&#039;ve seen Yext present at the tc50. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/01/the-25-million-demo-yext-scores-a-big-round-from-ivp-after-techcrunch50-debut/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/01/the-25-mil...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;focus on phone calls (as you mentioned) and pay per action metric as opposed to pay per call.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>don&#39;t know if you&#39;ve seen Yext present at the tc50. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/01/the-25-million-demo-yext-scores-a-big-round-from-ivp-after-techcrunch50-debut/" rel="nofollow">http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/01/the-25-mil&#8230;</a></p>
<p>focus on phone calls (as you mentioned) and pay per action metric as opposed to pay per call.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/02/the-problem-with-online-local-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-3618</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 19:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1316#comment-3618</guid>
		<description>While this data point might not be local enough for the point you are trying to make, here&#039;s recent a report that estimated 74% of Facebook&#039;s ad revenues were coming from local advertisers: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.insidefacebook.com/2009/07/20/report-74-of-facebook-ad-revenues-from-local-advertisers/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.insidefacebook.com/2009/07/20/report...&lt;/a&gt;, which would lead me to believe local advertising model can succeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While this data point might not be local enough for the point you are trying to make, here&#39;s recent a report that estimated 74% of Facebook&#39;s ad revenues were coming from local advertisers: <a href="http://www.insidefacebook.com/2009/07/20/report-74-of-facebook-ad-revenues-from-local-advertisers/" rel="nofollow">http://www.insidefacebook.com/2009/07/20/report&#8230;</a>, which would lead me to believe local advertising model can succeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris dixon</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/02/the-problem-with-online-local-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-3617</link>
		<dc:creator>chris dixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 19:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1316#comment-3617</guid>
		<description>True, although a lot of startups have done well bringing offline businesses online - e.g. in the leadgen space.  The difference is that a, say, auto loan dealer is used to paying for leads, analyzing lifetime value of customer etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, although a lot of startups have done well bringing offline businesses online &#8211; e.g. in the leadgen space.  The difference is that a, say, auto loan dealer is used to paying for leads, analyzing lifetime value of customer etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris dixon</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/02/the-problem-with-online-local-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-3616</link>
		<dc:creator>chris dixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 19:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1316#comment-3616</guid>
		<description>Opentable took many years and had to build reservation machines for startups to use.  Not saying it won&#039;t happen but it is hard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opentable took many years and had to build reservation machines for startups to use.  Not saying it won&#39;t happen but it is hard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris dixon</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/02/the-problem-with-online-local-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-3615</link>
		<dc:creator>chris dixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 19:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1316#comment-3615</guid>
		<description>Long term, I think you are definitely right.  With these kinds of tech transitions, the big question is always whether its 2 or 10 years away (in the first case your startup with thrive, in the second it won&#039;t).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Long term, I think you are definitely right.  With these kinds of tech transitions, the big question is always whether its 2 or 10 years away (in the first case your startup with thrive, in the second it won&#39;t).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris dixon</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/02/the-problem-with-online-local-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-3614</link>
		<dc:creator>chris dixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 19:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1316#comment-3614</guid>
		<description>My point, btw, was not to say there aren&#039;t great local businesses.  Meetup is certainly one of them.  I&#039;m just continuously surprised at how many pitches I hear where the founders think getting users is the main challenge and don&#039;t realize there is a whole other huge challenge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My point, btw, was not to say there aren&#39;t great local businesses.  Meetup is certainly one of them.  I&#39;m just continuously surprised at how many pitches I hear where the founders think getting users is the main challenge and don&#39;t realize there is a whole other huge challenge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris dixon</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/02/the-problem-with-online-local-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-3613</link>
		<dc:creator>chris dixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 19:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1316#comment-3613</guid>
		<description>yes, that&#039;s an interesting possibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, that&#39;s an interesting possibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris dixon</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/02/the-problem-with-online-local-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-3612</link>
		<dc:creator>chris dixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 19:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1316#comment-3612</guid>
		<description>In your Foursquare scenario, who pays Foursquare?  you or the restaurant?  how much and how would the pricing work?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In your Foursquare scenario, who pays Foursquare?  you or the restaurant?  how much and how would the pricing work?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/02/the-problem-with-online-local-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-3611</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 17:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1316#comment-3611</guid>
		<description>I agree.  And to use the example of restaurants, we are already seeing young chefs &quot;tweet&quot; their daily menus, or engage in conversations with customers about new experimental dishes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The online conversation btw customers and local business is rapidly growing and it&#039;s the new generation of small business owners that are leading the charge - aka they recognize the value.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jeff, love to grab some info about your Urban Radar project.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.  And to use the example of restaurants, we are already seeing young chefs &#8220;tweet&#8221; their daily menus, or engage in conversations with customers about new experimental dishes.</p>
<p>The online conversation btw customers and local business is rapidly growing and it&#39;s the new generation of small business owners that are leading the charge &#8211; aka they recognize the value.</p>
<p>Jeff, love to grab some info about your Urban Radar project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Blanchard</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/02/the-problem-with-online-local-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-3610</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Blanchard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 17:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1316#comment-3610</guid>
		<description>While most of this points to the problems of local today, I don&#039;t think the same problems will exist tomorrow.  Many of these businesses are generational, and I don&#039;t think the next generation of dry cleaners, pubs, and laundromats will view technology as irrelevant.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As reservations, payment, etc move to the mobile world vendors will leverage technology because it is simply easier.  No more stops to the dry cleaners without knowing whether my stuff is ready.  No more trips to the laundromat to find all the units in use.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Much of this has to do with legacy systems I think: the lifecycle of the hardware.  Once all forms of hardware are networked at a marginal cost to buyers and software exists that doesn&#039;t make every development job custom for these businesses, companies like Foursquare and Loopt are a natural place not only for discovery but for merchant processing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think OpenTable serves as a good example of networked hardware monetizing local.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But I&#039;d love to hear about it if you think I&#039;m wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While most of this points to the problems of local today, I don&#39;t think the same problems will exist tomorrow.  Many of these businesses are generational, and I don&#39;t think the next generation of dry cleaners, pubs, and laundromats will view technology as irrelevant.  </p>
<p>As reservations, payment, etc move to the mobile world vendors will leverage technology because it is simply easier.  No more stops to the dry cleaners without knowing whether my stuff is ready.  No more trips to the laundromat to find all the units in use.  </p>
<p>Much of this has to do with legacy systems I think: the lifecycle of the hardware.  Once all forms of hardware are networked at a marginal cost to buyers and software exists that doesn&#39;t make every development job custom for these businesses, companies like Foursquare and Loopt are a natural place not only for discovery but for merchant processing.</p>
<p>I think OpenTable serves as a good example of networked hardware monetizing local.</p>
<p>But I&#39;d love to hear about it if you think I&#39;m wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.403 seconds -->
<!-- Cached page served by WP-Cache -->

