<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dow 10,000 and economic reflexivity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cdixon.org/2009/10/17/dow-10000-and-economic-reflexivity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/17/dow-10000-and-economic-reflexivity/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 18:05:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: chris dixon</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/17/dow-10000-and-economic-reflexivity/comment-page-1/#comment-5727</link>
		<dc:creator>chris dixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1583#comment-5727</guid>
		<description>Mark - I by no means think we are out of the woods, and agree unemployment looms large.  That said, the good scenario is Dow 10,000 means consumers feel better, which leads to earning (see Google etc recently) which leads to hiring etc.  In that sense perception can affect reality.  But its also not everything.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Main main point here was to counter what a lot of criticisms I hear about the Bush/Obama bailout.  I think people are forgetting how dire things were 10 months ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark &#8211; I by no means think we are out of the woods, and agree unemployment looms large.  That said, the good scenario is Dow 10,000 means consumers feel better, which leads to earning (see Google etc recently) which leads to hiring etc.  In that sense perception can affect reality.  But its also not everything.</p>
<p>Main main point here was to counter what a lot of criticisms I hear about the Bush/Obama bailout.  I think people are forgetting how dire things were 10 months ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dow 10,000 and economic reflexivity &#124; Igniting Startups - nPost</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/17/dow-10000-and-economic-reflexivity/comment-page-1/#comment-4311</link>
		<dc:creator>Dow 10,000 and economic reflexivity &#124; Igniting Startups - nPost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1583#comment-4311</guid>
		<description>[...] From cdixon.org [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] From cdixon.org [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: msuster</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/17/dow-10000-and-economic-reflexivity/comment-page-1/#comment-5726</link>
		<dc:creator>msuster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1583#comment-5726</guid>
		<description>Hey Chris.  I agree with mostly everything in your post with the exception of the sentiment of the final paragraph.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree that the economy and consumer psyche are linked and can have an impact on the &quot;real economy&quot; but there are certain fundamentals that can override things.  For example, unemployment continues to go up.  If this continues the market will adjust and it could be swiftly.  Many smart thinkers believe this will happen.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I believe that the current market levels are supported by a rise in consumer sentiment that has fueled consumer spending.  But this consumer spending is fundamentally unsustainable.  Why? First, that pesky unemployment has a correlation with housing prices.  We spend when we feel the &quot;wealth effect&quot; and when we think we have equity in our homes and bank.  Second, there is an inverse correlation between unemployment and housing prices.  Third, despite increases in savings lately we are still in too much consumer debt as a nation.  Fourth, banks are tightening what credit is available for consumers.  Fifth, less jobs, heavy consumer debt, less credit, lower housing prices means ... less spending.  And thus the stock market pulls back leading to ... lower retirement money and therefore less &quot;wealth effect.&quot;  I&#039;m just sayin&#039; - sentiment is important, just not everything.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But as for the necessity of the bank bailout - I&#039;m with ya.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Chris.  I agree with mostly everything in your post with the exception of the sentiment of the final paragraph.</p>
<p>I agree that the economy and consumer psyche are linked and can have an impact on the &#8220;real economy&#8221; but there are certain fundamentals that can override things.  For example, unemployment continues to go up.  If this continues the market will adjust and it could be swiftly.  Many smart thinkers believe this will happen.  </p>
<p>I believe that the current market levels are supported by a rise in consumer sentiment that has fueled consumer spending.  But this consumer spending is fundamentally unsustainable.  Why? First, that pesky unemployment has a correlation with housing prices.  We spend when we feel the &#8220;wealth effect&#8221; and when we think we have equity in our homes and bank.  Second, there is an inverse correlation between unemployment and housing prices.  Third, despite increases in savings lately we are still in too much consumer debt as a nation.  Fourth, banks are tightening what credit is available for consumers.  Fifth, less jobs, heavy consumer debt, less credit, lower housing prices means &#8230; less spending.  And thus the stock market pulls back leading to &#8230; lower retirement money and therefore less &#8220;wealth effect.&#8221;  I&#39;m just sayin&#39; &#8211; sentiment is important, just not everything.</p>
<p>But as for the necessity of the bank bailout &#8211; I&#39;m with ya.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris dixon</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/17/dow-10000-and-economic-reflexivity/comment-page-1/#comment-4298</link>
		<dc:creator>chris dixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 10:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1583#comment-4298</guid>
		<description>Mark - I by no means think we are out of the woods, and agree unemployment looms large.  That said, the good scenario is Dow 10,000 means consumers feel better, which leads to earning (see Google etc recently) which leads to hiring etc.  In that sense perception can affect reality.  But its also not everything.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Main main point here was to counter what a lot of criticisms I hear about the Bush/Obama bailout.  I think people are forgetting how dire things were 10 months ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark &#8211; I by no means think we are out of the woods, and agree unemployment looms large.  That said, the good scenario is Dow 10,000 means consumers feel better, which leads to earning (see Google etc recently) which leads to hiring etc.  In that sense perception can affect reality.  But its also not everything.</p>
<p>Main main point here was to counter what a lot of criticisms I hear about the Bush/Obama bailout.  I think people are forgetting how dire things were 10 months ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: msuster</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/17/dow-10000-and-economic-reflexivity/comment-page-1/#comment-4291</link>
		<dc:creator>msuster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 06:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1583#comment-4291</guid>
		<description>Hey Chris.  I agree with mostly everything in your post with the exception of the sentiment of the final paragraph.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree that the economy and consumer psyche are linked and can have an impact on the &quot;real economy&quot; but there are certain fundamentals that can override things.  For example, unemployment continues to go up.  If this continues the market will adjust and it could be swiftly.  Many smart thinkers believe this will happen.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I believe that the current market levels are supported by a rise in consumer sentiment that has fueled consumer spending.  But this consumer spending is fundamentally unsustainable.  Why? First, that pesky unemployment has a correlation with housing prices.  We spend when we feel the &quot;wealth effect&quot; and when we think we have equity in our homes and bank.  Second, there is an inverse correlation between unemployment and housing prices.  Third, despite increases in savings lately we are still in too much consumer debt as a nation.  Fourth, banks are tightening what credit is available for consumers.  Fifth, less jobs, heavy consumer debt, less credit, lower housing prices means ... less spending.  And thus the stock market pulls back leading to ... lower retirement money and therefore less &quot;wealth effect.&quot;  I&#039;m just sayin&#039; - sentiment is important, just not everything.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But as for the necessity of the bank bailout - I&#039;m with ya.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Chris.  I agree with mostly everything in your post with the exception of the sentiment of the final paragraph.</p>
<p>I agree that the economy and consumer psyche are linked and can have an impact on the &#8220;real economy&#8221; but there are certain fundamentals that can override things.  For example, unemployment continues to go up.  If this continues the market will adjust and it could be swiftly.  Many smart thinkers believe this will happen.  </p>
<p>I believe that the current market levels are supported by a rise in consumer sentiment that has fueled consumer spending.  But this consumer spending is fundamentally unsustainable.  Why? First, that pesky unemployment has a correlation with housing prices.  We spend when we feel the &#8220;wealth effect&#8221; and when we think we have equity in our homes and bank.  Second, there is an inverse correlation between unemployment and housing prices.  Third, despite increases in savings lately we are still in too much consumer debt as a nation.  Fourth, banks are tightening what credit is available for consumers.  Fifth, less jobs, heavy consumer debt, less credit, lower housing prices means &#8230; less spending.  And thus the stock market pulls back leading to &#8230; lower retirement money and therefore less &#8220;wealth effect.&#8221;  I&#39;m just sayin&#39; &#8211; sentiment is important, just not everything.</p>
<p>But as for the necessity of the bank bailout &#8211; I&#39;m with ya.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mayanks</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/17/dow-10000-and-economic-reflexivity/comment-page-1/#comment-4285</link>
		<dc:creator>mayanks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 02:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1583#comment-4285</guid>
		<description>Indeed the last year has been a huge roller coster ride for everyone. At the onset it did look like the big depression coming back, but the timely intervention and injection of huge funds by governments around the world seems to have brought things back to normal. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I clearly do not understand economics and have no formal training in that field. I think myself to be a logical person and from what little I have read over the internet it does seem to me that the fundamentals are just not strong yet. The banks have been bailed out, and I don&#039;t know how the government will recover it&#039;s money But these financial institutions will have to show some growth cause they are not government. And growing in this post recession environment will have to be done by taking risks. So how could we possibly be recovering when these finance institutions are going back to their ways?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To me as Nassim Nicholas Taleb would say, we are being fooled by randomness. I may be totally wrong (I hope so) but logically it just doesn&#039;t add up for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed the last year has been a huge roller coster ride for everyone. At the onset it did look like the big depression coming back, but the timely intervention and injection of huge funds by governments around the world seems to have brought things back to normal. </p>
<p>I clearly do not understand economics and have no formal training in that field. I think myself to be a logical person and from what little I have read over the internet it does seem to me that the fundamentals are just not strong yet. The banks have been bailed out, and I don&#39;t know how the government will recover it&#39;s money But these financial institutions will have to show some growth cause they are not government. And growing in this post recession environment will have to be done by taking risks. So how could we possibly be recovering when these finance institutions are going back to their ways?</p>
<p>To me as Nassim Nicholas Taleb would say, we are being fooled by randomness. I may be totally wrong (I hope so) but logically it just doesn&#39;t add up for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Rosenfeld</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/17/dow-10000-and-economic-reflexivity/comment-page-1/#comment-4282</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Rosenfeld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 01:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1583#comment-4282</guid>
		<description>My aunt forwarded this to me earlier in the week.  It struck me as a nice little allegory for the reflexivity you reference...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;***&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s late fall and the Indians on a remote reservation in South Dakota asked their new chief if the coming winter was going to be cold or mild.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Since he was a chief in a modern society, he had never been taught the old secrets. When he looked at the sky, he couldn&#039;t tell what the winter was going to be like.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nevertheless, to be on the safe side, he told his tribe that the winter was indeed going to be cold and that the members of the village should collect firewood to be prepared..&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But, being a practical leader, after several days, he got an idea. He went to the phone booth, called the National Weather Service and asked, &#039;Is the coming winter going to be cold?&#039;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#039;It looks like this winter is going to be quite cold,&#039; the meteorologist at the weather service responded.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So the chief went back to his people and told them to collect even more firewood in order to be prepared.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A week later, he called the National Weather Service again. &#039;Does it still look like it is going to be a very cold winter?&#039;  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#039;Yes,&#039; the man at National Weather Service again replied, &#039;it&#039;s going to be a very cold winter.&#039; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The chief again went back to his people and ordered them to collect every scrap of firewood they could find.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Two weeks later, the chief called the National Weather Service again. &#039;Are you absolutely sure that the winter is going to be very cold?&#039;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#039;Absolutely,&#039; the man replied.  &#039;It&#039;s looking more and more like it is going to be one of the coldest winters we&#039;ve ever seen.&#039;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#039;How can you be so sure?&#039; the chief asked. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The weatherman replied, &#039;The Indians are collecting firewood like crazy.&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My aunt forwarded this to me earlier in the week.  It struck me as a nice little allegory for the reflexivity you reference&#8230;</p>
<p>***</p>
<p>It&#39;s late fall and the Indians on a remote reservation in South Dakota asked their new chief if the coming winter was going to be cold or mild.</p>
<p>Since he was a chief in a modern society, he had never been taught the old secrets. When he looked at the sky, he couldn&#39;t tell what the winter was going to be like.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, to be on the safe side, he told his tribe that the winter was indeed going to be cold and that the members of the village should collect firewood to be prepared..</p>
<p>But, being a practical leader, after several days, he got an idea. He went to the phone booth, called the National Weather Service and asked, &#39;Is the coming winter going to be cold?&#39;</p>
<p>&#39;It looks like this winter is going to be quite cold,&#39; the meteorologist at the weather service responded.</p>
<p>So the chief went back to his people and told them to collect even more firewood in order to be prepared.</p>
<p>A week later, he called the National Weather Service again. &#39;Does it still look like it is going to be a very cold winter?&#39;  </p>
<p>&#39;Yes,&#39; the man at National Weather Service again replied, &#39;it&#39;s going to be a very cold winter.&#39; </p>
<p>The chief again went back to his people and ordered them to collect every scrap of firewood they could find.</p>
<p>Two weeks later, the chief called the National Weather Service again. &#39;Are you absolutely sure that the winter is going to be very cold?&#39;</p>
<p>&#39;Absolutely,&#39; the man replied.  &#39;It&#39;s looking more and more like it is going to be one of the coldest winters we&#39;ve ever seen.&#39;</p>
<p>&#39;How can you be so sure?&#39; the chief asked. </p>
<p>The weatherman replied, &#39;The Indians are collecting firewood like crazy.&#39;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris dixon</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/17/dow-10000-and-economic-reflexivity/comment-page-1/#comment-4270</link>
		<dc:creator>chris dixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 22:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1583#comment-4270</guid>
		<description>:)  That&#039;s why I only look at Google News mentions (bottom graph), not query frequency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src='http://cdixon.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   That&#39;s why I only look at Google News mentions (bottom graph), not query frequency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gregory</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/17/dow-10000-and-economic-reflexivity/comment-page-1/#comment-4269</link>
		<dc:creator>gregory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 22:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1583#comment-4269</guid>
		<description>This is all well and good, but what do you make of the fact that while the likelihood of a great depression occurring has fluctuated over the past six years, the likelihood of a teleport machine being invented has steadily dropped &lt;a href=&quot;http://bit.ly/4bKr3q&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://bit.ly/4bKr3q&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is all well and good, but what do you make of the fact that while the likelihood of a great depression occurring has fluctuated over the past six years, the likelihood of a teleport machine being invented has steadily dropped <a href="http://bit.ly/4bKr3q" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/4bKr3q</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Dolan</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/10/17/dow-10000-and-economic-reflexivity/comment-page-1/#comment-4254</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Dolan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 14:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=1583#comment-4254</guid>
		<description>Dow at 10,000 has the purchasing power of  a DOW of 7500 10 years ago. Also the dow of 10,000 is not the same as the dow 0f 10,000 a few weeks ago if it had even reached it. The $ is falling like a rock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dow at 10,000 has the purchasing power of  a DOW of 7500 10 years ago. Also the dow of 10,000 is not the same as the dow 0f 10,000 a few weeks ago if it had even reached it. The $ is falling like a rock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.123 seconds -->
