Chris Dixon

Presenting Founder Collective

As readers of this blog know, I’m a huge fan of the startup and venture capital world but also a sometimes critic of how the venture capital industry works. For a long time I’ve wanted to do more than talk about this and actually start a new kind of venture firm, designed the right way from the ground up.

Last year two friends of mine who are both very successful, serial entrepreneurs — Eric Paley and Dave Frankel — were brainstorming ideas for what to do next when the thought occurred: why not make their next startup a new kind of venture firm, the kind we had wished existed back when we started our first companies?

So this is what we, along with a bunch of other serial entrepreneurs, decided to do. We call our new firm Founder Collective. Joining us are Mark Gerson (founder of Gerson Lehrman Group), Zach Klein (co-founder of Vimeo/Connected Ventures), Bill Trenchard (co-founder of LiveOps), and Micah Rosenbloom (co-founder of Brontes). We expect to add more founders over time.

We think of ourselves as part of a new wave venture firms led by Y Combinator, First Round, Maples, Ron Conway/Baseline, and Betaworks, among others, that have adapted to a world where venture capital is abundant but authentic seed capital and, more importantly, mentorship from experienced entrepreneurs, is scarce. We have many similarities to these firms and also some differences:

1) We have a small fund – approximately $40M – and intend to keep it that way. This means seed investments are our entire business — they are not options on future financings. Hence our interests and the founders’ interests are aligned. This also means we are happy with smaller exits if that’s what the entrepreneur wants to do.

2) Each person involved in Founder Collective is an entrepreneur, most of them currently running startups full time (my full-time job is CEO/co-founder of Hunch).

3) We believe the best people to predict the future — and create it — are fellow entrepreneurs, not former bankers drawing graphs and developing abstract theses.

4) We try to be respectful. We’ve all sat in countless meetings where VCs show up late, email while you are presenting, and generally act arrogant and dismissive. We try really hard not to be like that.

5) We’ll make investments anywhere in the world but tend to favor our home turf – New York City and Cambridge, MA. New York is a hotbed for online media and advertising startups. In Cambridge, there is a constant flow of ideas coming out of places like MIT that just need a little capital and guidance.

We realize the word “Collective” sounds a bit radical, even socialist. This is deliberate. While we have an actual fund — we are not just a group of angel investors — we also have a unique structure where active entrepreneurs lead investments, work hard to help their investments succeed, and share in the profits when they do.

Think of it as peer-to-peer venture capital.

  • http://twitter.com/djdan85 Dan

    A welcome addition for budding entrepreneurs in New York!

  • http://blog.zackbrandit.com Laurent Rozenfeld

    Congratulations!
    It's a great initiative I hope to see one day in Europe!

  • http://blog.zackbrandit.com Laurent Rozenfeld

    Congratulations!
    It's a great initiative I hope to see one day in Europe!

  • http://www.bijansabet.com bijan

    Congrats!

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention Presenting Founder Collective cdixon.org – chris dixon's blog -- Topsy.com

  • http://innonate.com/ innonate

    A win for NYC. Love the experimentation.

  • http://www.elieseidman.com Elie Seidman

    the damn socialists are taking over the world ;-) congrats and good luck!

  • http://www.tylerwillis.net Tyler Willis

    Chris, can you expand a bit on this: “we also have a unique structure where active entrepreneurs lead investments, work hard to help their investments succeed, and share in the profits when they do.”

    Sounds like the partner most in-line with the startup will take lead on the investment for FC and will receive a bigger piece of the pie then other fund partners for doing so. Do they take a board seat? Are there expectations around time? How will partners mitigate their busy life as founder interfering with their commitment to their partners and board?

    It's an amazing group of people, I can't wait to follow you all more closely in the coming years.

    • http://twitter.com/cdixon chris dixon

      > Sounds like the partner most in-line with the startup will take lead on the investment for FC and will receive a bigger piece of the pie then other fund partners for doing so.

      Yeah.

      Board seat: sometimes, but not necessary. We are very flexible.

  • Pingback: The Adapted Capital Firm: Venture Capital, Metamorphosed « The Mark Bao Journal

  • Pingback: SELECT « TheWaterRat

  • http://twitter.com/justinkan Justin Kan

    Looking forward to seeing what companies come out of this

  • http://www.wac6.typepad.com William Carleton

    Chris, congratulations. The whole project sounds awesome, but the points that resonate with me the most are those you lay out at (1). Keeping smaller exits viable–that's where the ecosystem needs to go, at least in info tech. A decade ago, I co-founded a boutique firm whose mission was to do seed investments only, but I think the timing is even better now for such a concept (the firm I co-founded ended up going a different direction after the dot com implosion, but that's a longer story).

  • Pingback: Shlok Vaidya’s Thinking » P2P Venture Capitalism

  • http://borismsilver.wordpress.com Boris M. Silver

    awesome to see entrepreneurs backing other entrepreneurs.

  • petermccarthy

    Excellent stuff, Chris.

    I just wish we had something like this in the UK. Out of interest, if FC made an investment in a UK startup, how would this work in practice?

  • Johndmc

    Congratulations, sounds like a great addition to the NYC startup world.

    • http://twitter.com/cdixon chris dixon

      Thanks!!

  • charlottekim

    Wow! Just got back from SF where I was in the audience listening to a panel of Angel funds talking about how they were doing B AND C rounds in their current investments AND requiring preferred shares if they do take a new company– HUH?! REALLY? Would love to talk to you guys!

  • Pingback: My Twitts from 2009-11-10 « Louis van Proosdij’s Twitts

  • http://www.victusspiritus.com/ Mark Essel

    We're in a state of “high flux” (read as dynamic pages). We're cleaning up the look, layout, and choices available to users (Tyler much more than me, as I'm ramping up my Ruby knowledge).

  • Dave Blanchard

    Pretty cool Chris…congrats!

  • netjacobsson

    Really good idea. Wish you all the best. We need more initiatives like this. The era of the investpreneur has come

  • http://www.coachwei.com/ Coach Wei

    Chris – this is fantastic for Boston and NYC. We need more of this. In particular, the model is very interesting (by entrepreneurs who are in the trenches) vs the normal VC model (by ex-entrepreneurs who were successful but see the everything from the 1-2 successes years ago, MBAs who never built a company, or worse, bankers).

    –Coach Wei

  • Pingback: Daily Links #122 | CloudKnow

  • http://twitter.com/ArtSpark Kristine Maltrud

    Love what you're doing. P2P is changing the world, 1 P2P at a time. Also love that you're having a dialogue right here! We're not located in NYC, but having great conversations with artists and arts orgs there about P2P fundraising for artists/arts projects. Cheers!

  • http://shanacarp.com/essays ShanaC

    COngrdaultions.

    Read the really Radical. Critical Art Ensemble…Tactical Media, Observations on Collective Cultural Action (You may plagiarize this document, you just have to tell them, they are, err, a step beyond creative commons)

    http://www.critical-art.net/books/digital/tact4

  • tchan

    I am looking for mentors and investments for my new company (mobile market). What kind of information is needed for submition for application? Better yet, what I have to do to get 5 min of your time?

  • Pingback: Google Revs Regulation Engine; TARGUSinfo and AdMeld Bring The Data; The Performance Rocket

  • http://toobla.com Brian Link

    Brilliant. This is absolutely fantastic. I will anxiously await an opportunity to come to NYC to meet with you guys.

  • alex

    yet another capitalist wolf in sheep's disguise:)

    • http://www.cdixon.org chris dixon

      we're pretty overtly capitalist actually.

    • mab

      no different than any other VC. they ignore entrepreneur's questions and request for information to their site's email. their site say “say hello, we're nice”. they forgot to say “at long as you not serious about actually looking for help”. Look at the post from Ankesh Kothari, his question still being ignore.

      entrepreneurs don't bend over yet! they are just like any VC.
      study the posted comments and you will realize this is just a PR spin for a wolf. not all VC are equal. many great company are started with the help of VC. At least they don't pretend to be a sheep.

      • http://www.cdixon.org chris dixon

        Dude, I posted this on Monday. Today is Thursday. We got tons of
        emails since then – far more than we could intelligently respond to.
        The fact that we haven't responded to you in under 3 days makes us
        “wolves”?

        • mab

          I am not Ankesh Kothari. I just use his post as example. Please don't take it personally. I am a straight shooter.

          1. Your issue with overwhelming messages is a common problem with many companies. You can use auto response email to acknowledge receive of the message. Maybe you can add some feature (link) to allow sender to automatically track average time to response and their order in the queue. Better yet make it into a web service for other business to use as well. One example would be federal and local government agency which handles many requests in a given day. Anyone reading this, do run with the idea. I have a ton.

          2. While it is easy to say you be different, proof it! suggestion, do an online youtube documentary for your vc with a entrepreneur. Start from reading the first executive summary to taking the company to success or failure. It will be like ABC shark tank but showing then how you do it different and how you can help with more than money.

          3. I not an entrepreneur. I saw too many dreams destroy by investors. One investor trick me into signing my patent away. He was an angel investor. So I am now just give warning. I am here to kiss up, I here to share my view.

          My apology if I insulted you in anyway.

        • mab

          one more note.

          Add yourself to angelsoft.net, because if you don't they provide misleading information to discourage people from apply to you. For example, the firm True Ventures invest in early seed startup but they will list it as a very late stage funding VC outfit to discourage potential early stage startup from applying.

  • sullivan8263

    What's the best way to present an idea to you? I've heard the traditional business plan isn't relevant. Great blog!

    • tchan

      don't expect an answer. there are 5 similar questions on this blog that went unanswered.

      • http://twitter.com/cdixon chris dixon

        It's a big question. I'm going to respond soon with a full blog post.

        • nobody

          Chris,
          When do you think you have an answer to this question?

          • http://twitter.com/cdixon chris dixon

            Well, this blog post http://cdixon.org/?p=1893 was meant to address one of my main suggestions about pitching.

  • sullivan8263

    What's the best way to present an idea to your team? I've read that the traditional business plan isn't relevant.

  • LJC

    I am review some of your past successes, very impressive. I am very interested in the mentor but I do not need the money. Would Founder Collective take on startup for mentoring?

  • Pingback: » Week in Review | StartupNorth

  • Chris Sorensen

    This is exactly what we need here in Silicon Valley.
    Please let me know when you open an office in Palo Alto.

  • http://twitter.com/cdixon chris dixon

    Well, this blog post http://cdixon.org/?p=1893 was meant to address one of my main suggestions about pitching.

  • Pingback: Founder Collective Is New Cambridge Seed Stage VC Focused on Lean Startups

  • Pingback: What’s the right amount of seed money to raise? | Igniting Startups - nPost

  • Pingback: Exectweets » davidcrow at 11/09/09 05:20:30

  • Pingback: It’s not that seed investors are smarter – it’s that entrepreneurs are cdixon.org – chris dixon's blog

  • Pingback: Sprouter » How a solid team has helped Chris Dixon build and invest in web startups