<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some thoughts on SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cdixon.org/2009/12/02/seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/02/seo/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 13:10:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Great Content Equals Great Rankings, Right? Wrong. &#171; WebGlide - SEO</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/02/seo/comment-page-1/#comment-5343</link>
		<dc:creator>Great Content Equals Great Rankings, Right? Wrong. &#171; WebGlide - SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 19:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=439#comment-5343</guid>
		<description>[...] excellent blog for a while now, so you can imagine that I was really excited to see him writing about SEO in a post last week. Chris kindly called out SEOmoz, which humbled me, but he also espoused some [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] excellent blog for a while now, so you can imagine that I was really excited to see him writing about SEO in a post last week. Chris kindly called out SEOmoz, which humbled me, but he also espoused some [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dental marketing</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/02/seo/comment-page-1/#comment-5744</link>
		<dc:creator>dental marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 06:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=439#comment-5744</guid>
		<description>white hat seo is the way to go it will help you in the long run. and i tottaly agree with this &quot;I think since other search engines try to emulate Google, optimizing for Google tends to optimize for others.&quot; this would definitely make the task of webmasters much easier, just focus on optimizing for one serp and others would come along.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>white hat seo is the way to go it will help you in the long run. and i tottaly agree with this &#8220;I think since other search engines try to emulate Google, optimizing for Google tends to optimize for others.&#8221; this would definitely make the task of webmasters much easier, just focus on optimizing for one serp and others would come along.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dental marketing</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/02/seo/comment-page-1/#comment-5294</link>
		<dc:creator>dental marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 22:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=439#comment-5294</guid>
		<description>white hat seo is the way to go it will help you in the long run. and i tottaly agree with this &quot;I think since other search engines try to emulate Google, optimizing for Google tends to optimize for others.&quot; this would definitely make the task of webmasters much easier, just focus on optimizing for one serp and others would come along.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>white hat seo is the way to go it will help you in the long run. and i tottaly agree with this &#8220;I think since other search engines try to emulate Google, optimizing for Google tends to optimize for others.&#8221; this would definitely make the task of webmasters much easier, just focus on optimizing for one serp and others would come along.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Great Content Equals Great Rankings, Right? Wrong. SEO Technique Help W3C Tag</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/02/seo/comment-page-1/#comment-5037</link>
		<dc:creator>Great Content Equals Great Rankings, Right? Wrong. SEO Technique Help W3C Tag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 07:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=439#comment-5037</guid>
		<description>[...] excellent blog for a while now, so you can imagine that I was really excited to see him writing about SEO in a post last week. Chris kindly called out SEOmoz, which humbled me, but he also espoused some [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] excellent blog for a while now, so you can imagine that I was really excited to see him writing about SEO in a post last week. Chris kindly called out SEOmoz, which humbled me, but he also espoused some [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcis Gasuns</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/02/seo/comment-page-1/#comment-5035</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcis Gasuns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 03:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=439#comment-5035</guid>
		<description>Luckily, most good SEO practices are also good UI/UX practices - I wish it always be so. But if it&#039;s not the case, I&#039;m more for UI. &lt;br&gt;Said by someone working from year 2002 in SEO :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luckily, most good SEO practices are also good UI/UX practices &#8211; I wish it always be so. But if it&#39;s not the case, I&#39;m more for UI. <br />Said by someone working from year 2002 in SEO <img src='http://cdixon.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Great Content Equals Great Rankings, Right? Wrong. &#124; Peer Marketing Group</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/02/seo/comment-page-1/#comment-5032</link>
		<dc:creator>Great Content Equals Great Rankings, Right? Wrong. &#124; Peer Marketing Group</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 19:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=439#comment-5032</guid>
		<description>[...] excellent blog for a while now, so you can imagine that I was really excited to see him writing about SEO in a post last week. Chris kindly called out SEOmoz, which&#8230;    Posted by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] excellent blog for a while now, so you can imagine that I was really excited to see him writing about SEO in a post last week. Chris kindly called out SEOmoz, which&hellip;    Posted by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Great Content Equals Great Rankings, Right? Wrong. &#171; SEO Land &#8211; Get Latest News about SEO</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/02/seo/comment-page-1/#comment-5021</link>
		<dc:creator>Great Content Equals Great Rankings, Right? Wrong. &#171; SEO Land &#8211; Get Latest News about SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 04:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=439#comment-5021</guid>
		<description>[...] excellent blog for a while now, so you can imagine that I was really excited to see him writing about SEO in a post last week. Chris kindly called out SEOmoz, which humbled me, but he also espoused some [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] excellent blog for a while now, so you can imagine that I was really excited to see him writing about SEO in a post last week. Chris kindly called out SEOmoz, which humbled me, but he also espoused some [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt M.</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/02/seo/comment-page-1/#comment-5020</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 00:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=439#comment-5020</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad you added the note about black hat techniques. There are a lot of companies that still continue the practices of spamming and as the search engines (especially Google) continue to evolve, these techniques will be recognized even faster and penalized more heavily.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m glad to see a lot more SEO firms like my own are taking purely white hat approaches, which are not only more ethical but more reliable for the long term rankings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m glad you added the note about black hat techniques. There are a lot of companies that still continue the practices of spamming and as the search engines (especially Google) continue to evolve, these techniques will be recognized even faster and penalized more heavily.</p>
<p>I&#39;m glad to see a lot more SEO firms like my own are taking purely white hat approaches, which are not only more ethical but more reliable for the long term rankings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEOmoz &#124; Great Content Equals Great Rankings, Right? Wrong. &#171; INDUSTRY11</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/02/seo/comment-page-1/#comment-5014</link>
		<dc:creator>SEOmoz &#124; Great Content Equals Great Rankings, Right? Wrong. &#171; INDUSTRY11</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 23:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=439#comment-5014</guid>
		<description>[...] excellent blog for a while now, so you can imagine that I was really excited to see him writing about SEO in a post last week. Chris kindly called out SEOmoz, which humbled me, but he also espoused some [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] excellent blog for a while now, so you can imagine that I was really excited to see him writing about SEO in a post last week. Chris kindly called out SEOmoz, which humbled me, but he also espoused some [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Martinez</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/02/seo/comment-page-1/#comment-5016</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Martinez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 20:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdixon.org/?p=439#comment-5016</guid>
		<description>It is fair to say that links are 70% of what many people in the industry do because they don&#039;t know what else can be done.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is NOT fair to say that links account for 70% of how search rankings are determined.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nor is it fair to say that links account for 70% of the work involved in search engine optimization.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is fair to say that links are 70% of what many people in the industry do because they don&#39;t know what else can be done.</p>
<p>It is NOT fair to say that links account for 70% of how search rankings are determined.</p>
<p>Nor is it fair to say that links account for 70% of the work involved in search engine optimization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.097 seconds -->
