<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Search and the social graph</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cdixon.org/2009/12/14/search-and-the-social-graph/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/14/search-and-the-social-graph/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 13:10:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Calculated Crunch News Rls &#187; Blog Archive &#187; News is a lousy business for Google too</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/14/search-and-the-social-graph/comment-page-2/#comment-7641</link>
		<dc:creator>Calculated Crunch News Rls &#187; Blog Archive &#187; News is a lousy business for Google too</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 22:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2181#comment-7641</guid>
		<description>[...] can afford to do this on news queries (along with many other categories of queries) because their real business is selling ads on queries where the user likely has purchasing intent. Big money-making categories [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] can afford to do this on news queries (along with many other categories of queries) because their real business is selling ads on queries where the user likely has purchasing intent. Big money-making categories [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: News is a lousy business for Google too cdixon.org &#8211; chris dixon&#39;s blog</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/14/search-and-the-social-graph/comment-page-2/#comment-7185</link>
		<dc:creator>News is a lousy business for Google too cdixon.org &#8211; chris dixon&#39;s blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 20:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2181#comment-7185</guid>
		<description>[...] can afford to do this on news queries (along with many other categories of queries) because their real business is selling ads on queries where the user likely has purchasing intent. Big money-making categories [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] can afford to do this on news queries (along with many other categories of queries) because their real business is selling ads on queries where the user likely has purchasing intent. Big money-making categories [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Challenge to Search will come in the form of a Status Update</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/14/search-and-the-social-graph/comment-page-2/#comment-6320</link>
		<dc:creator>The Challenge to Search will come in the form of a Status Update</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 05:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2181#comment-6320</guid>
		<description>[...] Fred Wilson&#8217;s AVC &#8220;Social Beats Search,&#8221; Chris Dixon&#8217;s Blog &#8220;Search and the social graph,&#8221; and Richard MacManus&#8217;s Read Write Web &#8220;Content Farms: Why Media, Blogs &amp; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fred Wilson&#8217;s AVC &#8220;Social Beats Search,&#8221; Chris Dixon&#8217;s Blog &#8220;Search and the social graph,&#8221; and Richard MacManus&#8217;s Read Write Web &#8220;Content Farms: Why Media, Blogs &amp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search and the social graph &#124; Igniting Startups - nPost</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/14/search-and-the-social-graph/comment-page-2/#comment-5306</link>
		<dc:creator>Search and the social graph &#124; Igniting Startups - nPost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2181#comment-5306</guid>
		<description>[...] From cdixon.org [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] From cdixon.org [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: This week in media musings: The Demand Media invasion, and &#8216;objectivity&#8217; trumps transparency &#124; Mark Coddington</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/14/search-and-the-social-graph/comment-page-2/#comment-5169</link>
		<dc:creator>This week in media musings: The Demand Media invasion, and &#8216;objectivity&#8217; trumps transparency &#124; Mark Coddington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 23:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2181#comment-5169</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;game&#8221; social networks like Twitter than search algorithms. In a related point, a few others noted that Google seems to be losing its battle against SEO-gaming spammers. Meanwhile, Jeff Jarvis [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;game&#8221; social networks like Twitter than search algorithms. In a related point, a few others noted that Google seems to be losing its battle against SEO-gaming spammers. Meanwhile, Jeff Jarvis [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Flying Change: Pain Is A Reliable Signal Coming Soon!</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/14/search-and-the-social-graph/comment-page-2/#comment-5147</link>
		<dc:creator>The Flying Change: Pain Is A Reliable Signal Coming Soon!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2181#comment-5147</guid>
		<description>[...] liked Chris Dixon&#8217;s post on &#8220;Search and the Social Graph&#8221; because it seemed to reflect some of the same sentiments that I talk about when I talk about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] liked Chris Dixon&#8217;s post on &#8220;Search and the Social Graph&#8221; because it seemed to reflect some of the same sentiments that I talk about when I talk about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OurielOhayon</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/14/search-and-the-social-graph/comment-page-2/#comment-5739</link>
		<dc:creator>OurielOhayon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2181#comment-5739</guid>
		<description>Chris, i would challenge your point about social networks shared link do not have an enough of an impact on purchase intent: i think it is all related to the way brands will manage their digital life and timely distribute for-purchase links. When i see how dell is using Twitter to generate nearly 7m USD a year from this channel only, i guess that altogether when Brands really learn how to use SNS right, this might come to scale and therefore will change the way ad budget will be allocated. Probably not before 24 months from today</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, i would challenge your point about social networks shared link do not have an enough of an impact on purchase intent: i think it is all related to the way brands will manage their digital life and timely distribute for-purchase links. When i see how dell is using Twitter to generate nearly 7m USD a year from this channel only, i guess that altogether when Brands really learn how to use SNS right, this might come to scale and therefore will change the way ad budget will be allocated. Probably not before 24 months from today</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OurielOhayon</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/14/search-and-the-social-graph/comment-page-2/#comment-5125</link>
		<dc:creator>OurielOhayon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 04:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2181#comment-5125</guid>
		<description>Chris, i would challenge your point about social networks shared link do not have an enough of an impact on purchase intent: i think it is all related to the way brands will manage their digital life and timely distribute for-purchase links. When i see how dell is using Twitter to generate nearly 7m USD a year from this channel only, i guess that altogether when Brands really learn how to use SNS right, this might come to scale and therefore will change the way ad budget will be allocated. Probably not before 24 months from today</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, i would challenge your point about social networks shared link do not have an enough of an impact on purchase intent: i think it is all related to the way brands will manage their digital life and timely distribute for-purchase links. When i see how dell is using Twitter to generate nearly 7m USD a year from this channel only, i guess that altogether when Brands really learn how to use SNS right, this might come to scale and therefore will change the way ad budget will be allocated. Probably not before 24 months from today</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Essel</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/14/search-and-the-social-graph/comment-page-1/#comment-5122</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Essel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 17:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2181#comment-5122</guid>
		<description>I have used friendfeed, and met some great folks there. But I&#039;m thinking of something a little more active. A tool that helps take all the bits of information I publicly share, and generates great finds/leads/etc for me to review while I have time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have used friendfeed, and met some great folks there. But I&#39;m thinking of something a little more active. A tool that helps take all the bits of information I publicly share, and generates great finds/leads/etc for me to review while I have time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jpmarcum</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/14/search-and-the-social-graph/comment-page-1/#comment-5121</link>
		<dc:creator>jpmarcum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 17:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2181#comment-5121</guid>
		<description>It may be owned by the public but it lives at twitter and I&#039;d argue that that is what matters most.  While facebook is being aggressive in bringing public voices in (through product/celebrity fan pages) and making private conversations public (through dodgy privacy policy updates), it&#039;s largely a destination for private conversation.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is friendfeed enough of a ghost for you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It may be owned by the public but it lives at twitter and I&#39;d argue that that is what matters most.  While facebook is being aggressive in bringing public voices in (through product/celebrity fan pages) and making private conversations public (through dodgy privacy policy updates), it&#39;s largely a destination for private conversation.  </p>
<p>Is friendfeed enough of a ghost for you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 2.896 seconds -->
