<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s feature creep</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cdixon.org/2009/12/17/googles-feature-creep/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/17/googles-feature-creep/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 12:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: traxor</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/17/googles-feature-creep/comment-page-1/#comment-5737</link>
		<dc:creator>traxor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 23:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2222#comment-5737</guid>
		<description>Luckily though, Google is free. Part of the complaint of Microsoft&#039;s software is that you&#039;re paying for cluttered software when it needn&#039;t be so.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Shame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luckily though, Google is free. Part of the complaint of Microsoft&#39;s software is that you&#39;re paying for cluttered software when it needn&#39;t be so.</p>
<p>Shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: traxor</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/17/googles-feature-creep/comment-page-1/#comment-5497</link>
		<dc:creator>traxor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 15:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2222#comment-5497</guid>
		<description>Luckily though, Google is free. Part of the complaint of Microsoft&#039;s software is that you&#039;re paying for cluttered software when it needn&#039;t be so.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Shame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luckily though, Google is free. Part of the complaint of Microsoft&#39;s software is that you&#39;re paying for cluttered software when it needn&#39;t be so.</p>
<p>Shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rikin</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/17/googles-feature-creep/comment-page-1/#comment-5465</link>
		<dc:creator>rikin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 01:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2222#comment-5465</guid>
		<description>@wilner, agreed talks of it have been around for a while but everyday comes another anti-Google post and I can&#039;t help but think that 2010 might just be the year some one does something about it. Even if it&#039;s a company putting in a no-robots.txt line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@wilner, agreed talks of it have been around for a while but everyday comes another anti-Google post and I can&#39;t help but think that 2010 might just be the year some one does something about it. Even if it&#39;s a company putting in a no-robots.txt line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wilner</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/17/googles-feature-creep/comment-page-1/#comment-5382</link>
		<dc:creator>wilner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 04:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2222#comment-5382</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right about that. I&#039;ve tried Bing and it&#039;s good but their indexing is very slow. Why is it so slow?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#39;re right about that. I&#39;ve tried Bing and it&#39;s good but their indexing is very slow. Why is it so slow?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wilner</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/17/googles-feature-creep/comment-page-1/#comment-5381</link>
		<dc:creator>wilner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 04:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2222#comment-5381</guid>
		<description>People have been talking about a Google backlash since before 2004, and nearly each year since then. But no tangible backlash has ever materialized.  But given that it took Microsoft decades to develop a similar backlash against it, perhaps it&#039;s just a matter of time.  I personally have been trying to wean myself off of Google. So far I&#039;ve stopped using Google search and maps, but I still use Youtube and Translate services, and my work forces me to use Gmail (which I couldn&#039;t stand from the start.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People have been talking about a Google backlash since before 2004, and nearly each year since then. But no tangible backlash has ever materialized.  But given that it took Microsoft decades to develop a similar backlash against it, perhaps it&#39;s just a matter of time.  I personally have been trying to wean myself off of Google. So far I&#39;ve stopped using Google search and maps, but I still use Youtube and Translate services, and my work forces me to use Gmail (which I couldn&#39;t stand from the start.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aseidman</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/17/googles-feature-creep/comment-page-1/#comment-5291</link>
		<dc:creator>aseidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 18:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2222#comment-5291</guid>
		<description>YouTube is a content play they acquired that benefited from both social networks and search engines.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At a macro level they realize that they need to own certain high value content sources (maps, local).  Why? If one player dominates (e.g. Amazon in shopping or iTunes in music) a large and lucrative vertical category they could pull a large set of query traffic away from Google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YouTube is a content play they acquired that benefited from both social networks and search engines.  </p>
<p>At a macro level they realize that they need to own certain high value content sources (maps, local).  Why? If one player dominates (e.g. Amazon in shopping or iTunes in music) a large and lucrative vertical category they could pull a large set of query traffic away from Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google’s feature creep &#124; Igniting Startups - nPost</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/17/googles-feature-creep/comment-page-1/#comment-5197</link>
		<dc:creator>Google’s feature creep &#124; Igniting Startups - nPost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 18:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2222#comment-5197</guid>
		<description>[...] From cdixon.org [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] From cdixon.org [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave kellogg</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/17/googles-feature-creep/comment-page-1/#comment-5202</link>
		<dc:creator>dave kellogg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 18:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2222#comment-5202</guid>
		<description>Totally agree on the scrolling real-time results -- annoying!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree on the scrolling real-time results &#8212; annoying!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Kessler</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/17/googles-feature-creep/comment-page-1/#comment-5160</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Kessler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 15:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2222#comment-5160</guid>
		<description>How about the new experimental design with COLOR?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitpic.com/u1xuf/full&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://twitpic.com/u1xuf/full&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about the new experimental design with COLOR?</p>
<p><a href="http://twitpic.com/u1xuf/full" rel="nofollow">http://twitpic.com/u1xuf/full</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Piamenta</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/17/googles-feature-creep/comment-page-1/#comment-5158</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Piamenta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 07:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2222#comment-5158</guid>
		<description>I always felt that hiring someone to manage your investment portfolio was dumb. In order to justify their commission and existence they have to do s-o-m-e-t-h-i-n-g. They buy, sell, hedge or whatever instead of just clinging to a good portfolio and letting it grow. The result is far less than optimal. &lt;br&gt;Same for Google.. even if you have an amazing simple product, what will you do with the $#I^loads of designers, programmers and consultants?... How can you just let the product rest?&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://lite.google.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;lite.google.com&lt;/a&gt; is a fabulous idea...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always felt that hiring someone to manage your investment portfolio was dumb. In order to justify their commission and existence they have to do s-o-m-e-t-h-i-n-g. They buy, sell, hedge or whatever instead of just clinging to a good portfolio and letting it grow. The result is far less than optimal. <br />Same for Google.. even if you have an amazing simple product, what will you do with the $#I^loads of designers, programmers and consultants?&#8230; How can you just let the product rest?<br /><a href="http://lite.google.com" rel="nofollow">lite.google.com</a> is a fabulous idea&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.121 seconds -->
