<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What’s strategic for Google?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 12:09:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search Engine Secrets - Transparency vs Asymmetrical Information</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-3/#comment-18001</link>
		<dc:creator>Search Engine Secrets - Transparency vs Asymmetrical Information</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-18001</guid>
		<description>[...] in the comments suggested that they should win by being open like Google. I read that and laughed. Where Google is losing you can count on them pushing the open label in order to build momentum &amp; destroy the asymmetrical information advantages of existing market leaders. But where Google [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the comments suggested that they should win by being open like Google. I read that and laughed. Where Google is losing you can count on them pushing the open label in order to build momentum &amp; destroy the asymmetrical information advantages of existing market leaders. But where Google [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transparency vs Asymmetrical Information &#171; Sogou (Chinese) &#171; SEO Tools</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-3/#comment-17486</link>
		<dc:creator>Transparency vs Asymmetrical Information &#171; Sogou (Chinese) &#171; SEO Tools</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-17486</guid>
		<description>[...] in the comments suggested that they should win by being open like Google. I read that and laughed. Where Google is losing you can count on them pushing the open label in order to build momentum &amp; destroy the asymmetrical information advantages of existing market leaders. But where Google [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the comments suggested that they should win by being open like Google. I read that and laughed. Where Google is losing you can count on them pushing the open label in order to build momentum &amp; destroy the asymmetrical information advantages of existing market leaders. But where Google [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transparency vs Asymmetrical Information &#124; WD22 &#8211; Best portal world wide web</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-3/#comment-17334</link>
		<dc:creator>Transparency vs Asymmetrical Information &#124; WD22 &#8211; Best portal world wide web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 21:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-17334</guid>
		<description>[...] in the comments suggested that they should win by being open like Google. I read that and laughed. Where Google is losing you can count on them pushing the open label in order to build momentum &amp; destroy the asymmetrical information advantages of existing market leaders. But where Google [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the comments suggested that they should win by being open like Google. I read that and laughed. Where Google is losing you can count on them pushing the open label in order to build momentum &amp; destroy the asymmetrical information advantages of existing market leaders. But where Google [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Enterprise-Transparency vs Asymmetrical Information</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-3/#comment-17331</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Enterprise-Transparency vs Asymmetrical Information</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 01:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-17331</guid>
		<description>[...] in the comments suggested that they should win by being open like Google. I read that and laughed. Where Google is losing you can count on them pushing the open label in order to build momentum &amp; destroy the asymmetrical information advantages of existing market leaders. But where Google [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the comments suggested that they should win by being open like Google. I read that and laughed. Where Google is losing you can count on them pushing the open label in order to build momentum &amp; destroy the asymmetrical information advantages of existing market leaders. But where Google [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What Wouldn&#039;t Google Do? &#124; iHeavy blog</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-3/#comment-17304</link>
		<dc:creator>What Wouldn&#039;t Google Do? &#124; iHeavy blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-17304</guid>
		<description>[...] always have, in areas where it leads.Aaron Wall put it brilliantly in his SEOBook blog:  &quot; Where Google is losing you can count on them pushing the open label in order to build momentum and destroy the asymmetrical information advantages of existing market leaders. But where Google [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] always have, in areas where it leads.Aaron Wall put it brilliantly in his SEOBook blog:  &quot; Where Google is losing you can count on them pushing the open label in order to build momentum and destroy the asymmetrical information advantages of existing market leaders. But where Google [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transparency vs Asymmetrical Information &#124; THIS IS TRUXST</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-3/#comment-17255</link>
		<dc:creator>Transparency vs Asymmetrical Information &#124; THIS IS TRUXST</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 13:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-17255</guid>
		<description>[...] in the comments suggested that they should win by being open like Google. I read that and laughed. Where Google is losing you can count on them pushing the open label in order to build momentum &amp; destroy the asymmetrical information advantages of existing market leaders. But where Google [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the comments suggested that they should win by being open like Google. I read that and laughed. Where Google is losing you can count on them pushing the open label in order to build momentum &amp; destroy the asymmetrical information advantages of existing market leaders. But where Google [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transparency vs Asymmetrical Information - SC Web Design Group</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-3/#comment-17193</link>
		<dc:creator>Transparency vs Asymmetrical Information - SC Web Design Group</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-17193</guid>
		<description>[...] in the comments suggested that they should win by being open like Google. I read that and laughed. Where Google is losing you can count on them pushing the open label in order to build momentum destroy the asymmetrical information advantages of existing market leaders. But where Google leads [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the comments suggested that they should win by being open like Google. I read that and laughed. Where Google is losing you can count on them pushing the open label in order to build momentum destroy the asymmetrical information advantages of existing market leaders. But where Google leads [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transparency vs Asymmetrical Information &#171; I kown any thing</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-3/#comment-17182</link>
		<dc:creator>Transparency vs Asymmetrical Information &#171; I kown any thing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 04:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-17182</guid>
		<description>[...] in the comments suggested that they should win by being open like Google. I read that and laughed. Where Google is losing you can count on them pushing the open label in order to build momentum &amp; destroy the asymmetrical information advantages of existing market leaders. But where Google [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the comments suggested that they should win by being open like Google. I read that and laughed. Where Google is losing you can count on them pushing the open label in order to build momentum &amp; destroy the asymmetrical information advantages of existing market leaders. But where Google [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search Engine Optimization Resource List &#124; ClickMinded - SEO Training in San Francisco</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-3/#comment-17127</link>
		<dc:creator>Search Engine Optimization Resource List &#124; ClickMinded - SEO Training in San Francisco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 17:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-17127</guid>
		<description>[...] Far and away, one of the most valuable tools out there. Unbelievable, world-class, enterprise-level analytics for free&#8230;. how is this even possible? Chris Dixon often writes about Google&#8217;s &#8220;commoditizing the complement&#8221; strategy, and has a great blog post on it here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Far and away, one of the most valuable tools out there. Unbelievable, world-class, enterprise-level analytics for free&#8230;. how is this even possible? Chris Dixon often writes about Google&#8217;s &#8220;commoditizing the complement&#8221; strategy, and has a great blog post on it here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transparency vs Asymmetrical Information &#171; Fast Ninja Blog by Freelanceful &#8211; Web Design &#124; Coding &#124; Freelancing</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-3/#comment-17029</link>
		<dc:creator>Transparency vs Asymmetrical Information &#171; Fast Ninja Blog by Freelanceful &#8211; Web Design &#124; Coding &#124; Freelancing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-17029</guid>
		<description>[...] in the comments suggested that they should win by being open like Google. I read that and laughed. Where Google is losing you can count on them pushing the open label in order to build momentum &amp; destroy the asymmetrical information advantages of existing market leaders. But where Google [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the comments suggested that they should win by being open like Google. I read that and laughed. Where Google is losing you can count on them pushing the open label in order to build momentum &amp; destroy the asymmetrical information advantages of existing market leaders. But where Google [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transparency vs Asymmetrical Information &#171; Designs By Brian</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-3/#comment-17019</link>
		<dc:creator>Transparency vs Asymmetrical Information &#171; Designs By Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 03:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-17019</guid>
		<description>[...] in the comments suggested that they should win by being open like Google. I read that and laughed. Where Google is losing you can count on them pushing the open label in order to build momentum &amp; destroy the asymmetrical information advantages of existing market leaders. But where Google [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the comments suggested that they should win by being open like Google. I read that and laughed. Where Google is losing you can count on them pushing the open label in order to build momentum &amp; destroy the asymmetrical information advantages of existing market leaders. But where Google [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transparency vs Asymmetrical Information</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-3/#comment-17017</link>
		<dc:creator>Transparency vs Asymmetrical Information</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 02:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-17017</guid>
		<description>[...] in the comments suggested that they should win by being open like Google. I read that and laughed. Where Google is losing you can count on them pushing the open label in order to build momentum destroy the asymmetrical information advantages of existing market leaders. But where Google leads [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the comments suggested that they should win by being open like Google. I read that and laughed. Where Google is losing you can count on them pushing the open label in order to build momentum destroy the asymmetrical information advantages of existing market leaders. But where Google leads [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transparency vs Asymmetrical Information &#124; Aitir Lab</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-3/#comment-17006</link>
		<dc:creator>Transparency vs Asymmetrical Information &#124; Aitir Lab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 07:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-17006</guid>
		<description>[...] in the comments suggested that they should win by being open like Google. I read that and laughed. Where Google is losing you can count on them pushing the open label in order to build momentum &amp; destroy the asymmetrical information advantages of existing market leaders. But where Google [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the comments suggested that they should win by being open like Google. I read that and laughed. Where Google is losing you can count on them pushing the open label in order to build momentum &amp; destroy the asymmetrical information advantages of existing market leaders. But where Google [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transparency vs Asymmetrical Information - SEO Traffic Backlink &#124; SEO Traffic Backlink</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-3/#comment-17005</link>
		<dc:creator>Transparency vs Asymmetrical Information - SEO Traffic Backlink &#124; SEO Traffic Backlink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 07:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-17005</guid>
		<description>[...] in the comments suggested that they should win by being open like Google. I read that and laughed. Where Google is losing you can count on them pushing the open label in order to build momentum &amp; destroy the asymmetrical information advantages of existing market leaders. But where Google [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the comments suggested that they should win by being open like Google. I read that and laughed. Where Google is losing you can count on them pushing the open label in order to build momentum &amp; destroy the asymmetrical information advantages of existing market leaders. But where Google [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transparency vs Asymmetrical Information &#171; Make Your Money &#171; Make Your Money Online</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-3/#comment-16999</link>
		<dc:creator>Transparency vs Asymmetrical Information &#171; Make Your Money &#171; Make Your Money Online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 03:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-16999</guid>
		<description>[...] in the comments suggested that they should win by being open like Google. I read that and laughed. Where Google is losing you can count on them pushing the open label in order to build momentum &amp; destroy the asymmetrical information advantages of existing market leaders. But where Google [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the comments suggested that they should win by being open like Google. I read that and laughed. Where Google is losing you can count on them pushing the open label in order to build momentum &amp; destroy the asymmetrical information advantages of existing market leaders. But where Google [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transparency vs Asymmetrical Information &#171; Seo Traffic &#171; SEO Traffic</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-3/#comment-16998</link>
		<dc:creator>Transparency vs Asymmetrical Information &#171; Seo Traffic &#171; SEO Traffic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 03:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-16998</guid>
		<description>[...] in the comments suggested that they should win by being open like Google. I read that and laughed. Where Google is losing you can count on them pushing the open label in order to build momentum &amp; destroy the asymmetrical information advantages of existing market leaders. But where Google [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the comments suggested that they should win by being open like Google. I read that and laughed. Where Google is losing you can count on them pushing the open label in order to build momentum &amp; destroy the asymmetrical information advantages of existing market leaders. But where Google [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bank, beat, business, competition, copy, debt, government, loss, money, nothing, Open, power, profits, risk, tax, thing, time, transparency, use, work - Transparency vs Asymmetrical Information - SEO</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-3/#comment-16996</link>
		<dc:creator>bank, beat, business, competition, copy, debt, government, loss, money, nothing, Open, power, profits, risk, tax, thing, time, transparency, use, work - Transparency vs Asymmetrical Information - SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 03:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-16996</guid>
		<description>[...] in the comments suggested that they should win by being open like Google. I read that and laughed. Where Google is losing you can count on them pushing the open label in order to build momentum &amp; destroy the asymmetrical information advantages of existing market leaders. But where Google [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the comments suggested that they should win by being open like Google. I read that and laughed. Where Google is losing you can count on them pushing the open label in order to build momentum &amp; destroy the asymmetrical information advantages of existing market leaders. But where Google [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transparency vs Asymmetrical Information &#171; Yodao（中国） &#171; AISEO Asia</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-3/#comment-16995</link>
		<dc:creator>Transparency vs Asymmetrical Information &#171; Yodao（中国） &#171; AISEO Asia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 03:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-16995</guid>
		<description>[...] in the comments suggested that they should win by being open like Google. I read that and laughed. Where Google is losing you can count on them pushing the open label in order to build momentum &amp; destroy the asymmetrical information advantages of existing market leaders. But where Google [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the comments suggested that they should win by being open like Google. I read that and laughed. Where Google is losing you can count on them pushing the open label in order to build momentum &amp; destroy the asymmetrical information advantages of existing market leaders. But where Google [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transparency vs Asymmetrical Information@seobook &#124; seo博客大全</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-3/#comment-16994</link>
		<dc:creator>Transparency vs Asymmetrical Information@seobook &#124; seo博客大全</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 02:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-16994</guid>
		<description>[...] in the comments suggested that they should win by being open like Google. I read that and laughed. Where Google is losing you can count on them pushing the open label in order to build momentum &amp; destroy the asymmetrical information advantages of existing market leaders. But where Google [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the comments suggested that they should win by being open like Google. I read that and laughed. Where Google is losing you can count on them pushing the open label in order to build momentum &amp; destroy the asymmetrical information advantages of existing market leaders. But where Google [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Betesh</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-3/#comment-16911</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Betesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 21:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-16911</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;far east movement lyrics if i was you...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]hendra virus is just one of a number of [...]...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>far east movement lyrics if i was you&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]hendra virus is just one of a number of [...]&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ClickMinded&#8217;s Search Engine Optimization Resource List &#124; ClickMinded &#8211; SEO Training in San Francisco</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-3/#comment-16908</link>
		<dc:creator>ClickMinded&#8217;s Search Engine Optimization Resource List &#124; ClickMinded &#8211; SEO Training in San Francisco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 19:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-16908</guid>
		<description>[...] Far and away, one of the most valuable tools out there. Unbelievable, world-class, enterprise-level analytics for free&#8230;. how is this even possible? Chris Dixon often writes about Google&#8217;s &#8220;commoditizing the complement&#8221; strategy, and has a great blog post on it here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Far and away, one of the most valuable tools out there. Unbelievable, world-class, enterprise-level analytics for free&#8230;. how is this even possible? Chris Dixon often writes about Google&#8217;s &#8220;commoditizing the complement&#8221; strategy, and has a great blog post on it here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quora</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-2/#comment-15542</link>
		<dc:creator>Quora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 22:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-15542</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Why did Steve Jobs hate Android?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Jobs probably wouldn&#039;t have minded as much if Google had developed a mobile OS that was as good as the iPhone&#039;s, or even better, and then sold it. What seems to have bothered him the most is that Android is just good enough to compete with the OS, an...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Why did Steve Jobs hate Android?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Jobs probably wouldn&#8217;t have minded as much if Google had developed a mobile OS that was as good as the iPhone&#8217;s, or even better, and then sold it. What seems to have bothered him the most is that Android is just good enough to compete with the OS, an&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blekko Offers a Cool Blind Taste Test Tool &#124; Web SEO Tips - Online SEO Articles</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-2/#comment-14949</link>
		<dc:creator>Blekko Offers a Cool Blind Taste Test Tool &#124; Web SEO Tips - Online SEO Articles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 15:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-14949</guid>
		<description>[...] any market where the leader has a monopolistic marketshare it is a great idea to encourage innovation elsewhere and promote further competition. In the past Blekko was a great SEO data source but I couldn&#8217;t use it as a default search [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] any market where the leader has a monopolistic marketshare it is a great idea to encourage innovation elsewhere and promote further competition. In the past Blekko was a great SEO data source but I couldn&#8217;t use it as a default search [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corporate Sites Deserve to Rank #1 (Brand Ad Dollars) &#124; Living Websites</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-2/#comment-14710</link>
		<dc:creator>Corporate Sites Deserve to Rank #1 (Brand Ad Dollars) &#124; Living Websites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 07:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-14710</guid>
		<description>[...] Everyone *but* Google should be open. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Everyone *but* Google should be open. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blekko Offers a Cool Blind Taste Test Tool &#124; Living Websites</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-2/#comment-14709</link>
		<dc:creator>Blekko Offers a Cool Blind Taste Test Tool &#124; Living Websites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 07:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-14709</guid>
		<description>[...] any market where the leader has a monopolistic marketshare it is a great idea to encourage innovation elsewhere and promote further competition. In the past Blekko was a great SEO data source but I couldn&#8217;t use it as a default search [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] any market where the leader has a monopolistic marketshare it is a great idea to encourage innovation elsewhere and promote further competition. In the past Blekko was a great SEO data source but I couldn&#8217;t use it as a default search [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blekko Offers a Cool Blind Taste Test Tool &#171; UpToDateForFun</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-2/#comment-14664</link>
		<dc:creator>Blekko Offers a Cool Blind Taste Test Tool &#171; UpToDateForFun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 17:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-14664</guid>
		<description>[...] any market where the leader has a monopolistic marketshare it is a great idea to encourage innovation elsewhere and promote further competition. In the past Blekko was a great SEO data source but I couldn&#8217;t use it as a default search [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] any market where the leader has a monopolistic marketshare it is a great idea to encourage innovation elsewhere and promote further competition. In the past Blekko was a great SEO data source but I couldn&#8217;t use it as a default search [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Webmaster Tricks And Tips &#187; Blekko Offers a Cool Blind Taste Test Tool</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-2/#comment-14663</link>
		<dc:creator>Webmaster Tricks And Tips &#187; Blekko Offers a Cool Blind Taste Test Tool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 09:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-14663</guid>
		<description>[...] any market where the leader has a monopolistic marketshare it is a great idea to encourage innovation elsewhere and promote further competition. In the past Blekko was a great SEO data source but I couldn&#8217;t use it as a default search [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] any market where the leader has a monopolistic marketshare it is a great idea to encourage innovation elsewhere and promote further competition. In the past Blekko was a great SEO data source but I couldn&#8217;t use it as a default search [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Webmaster Tricks And Tips &#187; Corporate Sites Deserve to Rank #1 (Brand Ad Dollars)</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-2/#comment-14662</link>
		<dc:creator>Webmaster Tricks And Tips &#187; Corporate Sites Deserve to Rank #1 (Brand Ad Dollars)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 15:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-14662</guid>
		<description>[...] Everyone *but* Google should be open. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Everyone *but* Google should be open. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corporate Sites Deserve to Rank #1 (Brand Ad Dollars) &#124; Blogging Tips</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-2/#comment-14633</link>
		<dc:creator>Corporate Sites Deserve to Rank #1 (Brand Ad Dollars) &#124; Blogging Tips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 07:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-14633</guid>
		<description>[...] Everyone *but* Google should be open. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Everyone *but* Google should be open. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Networking seo tips website tutorials blog solutions domain hosting</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-2/#comment-14627</link>
		<dc:creator>Networking seo tips website tutorials blog solutions domain hosting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2011 13:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-14627</guid>
		<description>[...] Everyone *but* Google should be open. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Everyone *but* Google should be open. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quora</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-2/#comment-14625</link>
		<dc:creator>Quora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2011 09:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-14625</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;What is the business value of Android to Google?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Commoditize the complement (economic theory) When the complement of something becomes cheaper, it in turn becomes more valuable [1][2]. E.g. Cheap internet will in turn lead to the increasing value of content, ergo Netflix. Google aims to commoditize e...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>What is the business value of Android to Google?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Commoditize the complement (economic theory) When the complement of something becomes cheaper, it in turn becomes more valuable [1][2]. E.g. Cheap internet will in turn lead to the increasing value of content, ergo Netflix. Google aims to commoditize e&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Networking seo tips website tutorials blog solutions domain hosting</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-2/#comment-14612</link>
		<dc:creator>Networking seo tips website tutorials blog solutions domain hosting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 13:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-14612</guid>
		<description>[...] any marketplace where a personality has a monopolistic marketshare it is a good thought to inspire creation elsewhere and foster serve competition. In a past Blekko was a good SEO information source yet we couldn&#8217;t use it as a default hunt [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] any marketplace where a personality has a monopolistic marketshare it is a good thought to inspire creation elsewhere and foster serve competition. In a past Blekko was a good SEO information source yet we couldn&#8217;t use it as a default hunt [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corporate Sites Deserve to Rank #1 (Brand Ad Dollars) &#124; Juice My Blog</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-2/#comment-14608</link>
		<dc:creator>Corporate Sites Deserve to Rank #1 (Brand Ad Dollars) &#124; Juice My Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 19:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-14608</guid>
		<description>[...] Everyone *but* Google should be open. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Everyone *but* Google should be open. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blekko Offers a Cool Blind Taste Test Tool &#124; Juice My Blog</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-2/#comment-14607</link>
		<dc:creator>Blekko Offers a Cool Blind Taste Test Tool &#124; Juice My Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 18:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-14607</guid>
		<description>[...] any market where the leader has a monopolistic marketshare it is a great idea to encourage innovation elsewhere and promote further competition. In the past Blekko was a great SEO data source but I couldn&#8217;t use it as a default search [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] any market where the leader has a monopolistic marketshare it is a great idea to encourage innovation elsewhere and promote further competition. In the past Blekko was a great SEO data source but I couldn&#8217;t use it as a default search [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corporate Sites Deserve to Rank #1 (Brand Ad Dollars) &#171; Seo &#171; Artificial Intelligence SEO</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-2/#comment-14586</link>
		<dc:creator>Corporate Sites Deserve to Rank #1 (Brand Ad Dollars) &#171; Seo &#171; Artificial Intelligence SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 02:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-14586</guid>
		<description>[...] Everyone *but* Google should be open. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Everyone *but* Google should be open. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blekko Offers a Cool Blind Taste Test Tool - Put your Blog Name Here</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-2/#comment-14585</link>
		<dc:creator>Blekko Offers a Cool Blind Taste Test Tool - Put your Blog Name Here</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 01:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-14585</guid>
		<description>[...] any market where the leader has a monopolistic marketshare it is a great idea to encourage innovation elsewhere and promote further competition. In the past Blekko was a great SEO data source but I couldn&#8217;t use it as a default search [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] any market where the leader has a monopolistic marketshare it is a great idea to encourage innovation elsewhere and promote further competition. In the past Blekko was a great SEO data source but I couldn&#8217;t use it as a default search [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blekko Offers a Cool Blind Taste Test Tool &#171; Seo &#171; Artificial Intelligence SEO</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-2/#comment-14584</link>
		<dc:creator>Blekko Offers a Cool Blind Taste Test Tool &#171; Seo &#171; Artificial Intelligence SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 00:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-14584</guid>
		<description>[...] any market where the leader has a monopolistic marketshare it is a great idea to encourage innovation elsewhere and promote further competition. In the past Blekko was a great SEO data source but I couldn&#8217;t use it as a default search [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] any market where the leader has a monopolistic marketshare it is a great idea to encourage innovation elsewhere and promote further competition. In the past Blekko was a great SEO data source but I couldn&#8217;t use it as a default search [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blekko Offers a Cool Blind Taste Test Tool &#171; Legal &#171; Legal Help 4 Free</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-2/#comment-14516</link>
		<dc:creator>Blekko Offers a Cool Blind Taste Test Tool &#171; Legal &#171; Legal Help 4 Free</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 19:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-14516</guid>
		<description>[...] any market where the leader has a monopolistic marketshare it is a great idea to encourage innovation elsewhere and promote further competition. In the past Blekko was a great SEO data source but I couldn&#8217;t use it as a default search [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] any market where the leader has a monopolistic marketshare it is a great idea to encourage innovation elsewhere and promote further competition. In the past Blekko was a great SEO data source but I couldn&#8217;t use it as a default search [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blekko Offers a Cool Blind Taste Test Tool &#171; Designs By Brian</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-2/#comment-14514</link>
		<dc:creator>Blekko Offers a Cool Blind Taste Test Tool &#171; Designs By Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 01:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-14514</guid>
		<description>[...] any market where the leader has a monopolistic marketshare it is a great idea to encourage innovation elsewhere and promote further competition. In the past Blekko was a great SEO data source but I couldn&#8217;t use it as a default search [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] any market where the leader has a monopolistic marketshare it is a great idea to encourage innovation elsewhere and promote further competition. In the past Blekko was a great SEO data source but I couldn&#8217;t use it as a default search [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blekko Offers a Cool Blind Taste Test Tool &#171; Art Management &#171; art-management-software.info</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-2/#comment-14513</link>
		<dc:creator>Blekko Offers a Cool Blind Taste Test Tool &#171; Art Management &#171; art-management-software.info</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-14513</guid>
		<description>[...] any market where the leader has a monopolistic marketshare it is a great idea to encourage innovation elsewhere and promote further competition. In the past Blekko was a great SEO data source but I couldn&#8217;t use it as a default search [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] any market where the leader has a monopolistic marketshare it is a great idea to encourage innovation elsewhere and promote further competition. In the past Blekko was a great SEO data source but I couldn&#8217;t use it as a default search [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blekko Offers a Cool Blind Taste Test Tool &#171; Leads &#171; get-business-leads.info</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-2/#comment-14510</link>
		<dc:creator>Blekko Offers a Cool Blind Taste Test Tool &#171; Leads &#171; get-business-leads.info</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-14510</guid>
		<description>[...] any market where the leader has a monopolistic marketshare it is a great idea to encourage innovation elsewhere and promote further competition. In the past Blekko was a great SEO data source but I couldn&#8217;t use it as a default search [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] any market where the leader has a monopolistic marketshare it is a great idea to encourage innovation elsewhere and promote further competition. In the past Blekko was a great SEO data source but I couldn&#8217;t use it as a default search [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blekko Offers a Cool Blind Taste Test Tool &#124; Aitir Google Lab</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-2/#comment-14508</link>
		<dc:creator>Blekko Offers a Cool Blind Taste Test Tool &#124; Aitir Google Lab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 01:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-14508</guid>
		<description>[...] any market where the leader has a monopolistic marketshare it is a great idea to encourage innovation elsewhere and promote further competition. In the past Blekko was a great SEO data source but I couldn&#8217;t use it as a default search [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] any market where the leader has a monopolistic marketshare it is a great idea to encourage innovation elsewhere and promote further competition. In the past Blekko was a great SEO data source but I couldn&#8217;t use it as a default search [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blekko Offers a Cool Blind Taste Test Tool &#124; Omaha SEO Service</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-2/#comment-14507</link>
		<dc:creator>Blekko Offers a Cool Blind Taste Test Tool &#124; Omaha SEO Service</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 23:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-14507</guid>
		<description>[...] any market where the leader has a monopolistic marketshare it is a great idea to encourage innovation elsewhere and promote further competition. In the past Blekko was a great SEO data source but I couldn&#8217;t use it as a default search [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] any market where the leader has a monopolistic marketshare it is a great idea to encourage innovation elsewhere and promote further competition. In the past Blekko was a great SEO data source but I couldn&#8217;t use it as a default search [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corporate Sites Deserve to Rank #1 (Brand Ad Dollars) &#124; Latest Updates</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-2/#comment-14420</link>
		<dc:creator>Corporate Sites Deserve to Rank #1 (Brand Ad Dollars) &#124; Latest Updates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 03:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-14420</guid>
		<description>[...] Everyone *but* Google should be open. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Everyone *but* Google should be open. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corporate Sites Deserve to Rank #1 (Brand Ad Dollars) &#171; UpToDateForFun</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-2/#comment-14342</link>
		<dc:creator>Corporate Sites Deserve to Rank #1 (Brand Ad Dollars) &#171; UpToDateForFun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 06:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-14342</guid>
		<description>[...] Everyone *but* Google should be open. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Everyone *but* Google should be open. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corporate Sites Deserve to Rank #1 (Brand Ad Dollars) &#171; Seo &#171; Seo Google &#124; Search Engine Optimization (SEO) – Webmaster Tools Help – Google</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-2/#comment-14305</link>
		<dc:creator>Corporate Sites Deserve to Rank #1 (Brand Ad Dollars) &#171; Seo &#171; Seo Google &#124; Search Engine Optimization (SEO) – Webmaster Tools Help – Google</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 14:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-14305</guid>
		<description>[...] Everyone *but* Google should be open. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Everyone *but* Google should be open. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corporate Sites Deserve to Rank #1 (Brand Ad Dollars) &#124; jetroharlis</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-2/#comment-14304</link>
		<dc:creator>Corporate Sites Deserve to Rank #1 (Brand Ad Dollars) &#124; jetroharlis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 07:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-14304</guid>
		<description>[...] Everyone *but* Google should be open. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Everyone *but* Google should be open. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corporate Sites Deserve to Rank #1 (Brand Ad Dollars) &#124; Blog Aldea Web Design</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-2/#comment-14169</link>
		<dc:creator>Corporate Sites Deserve to Rank #1 (Brand Ad Dollars) &#124; Blog Aldea Web Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2011 01:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-14169</guid>
		<description>[...] Everyone *but* Google should be open. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Everyone *but* Google should be open. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corporate Sites Deserve to Rank #1 (Brand Ad Dollars) &#171; Designs By Brian</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-2/#comment-14156</link>
		<dc:creator>Corporate Sites Deserve to Rank #1 (Brand Ad Dollars) &#171; Designs By Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 17:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-14156</guid>
		<description>[...] Everyone *but* Google should be open. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Everyone *but* Google should be open. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corporate Sites Deserve to Rank #1 (Brand Ad Dollars) &#124; Aitir Google Lab</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-2/#comment-14142</link>
		<dc:creator>Corporate Sites Deserve to Rank #1 (Brand Ad Dollars) &#124; Aitir Google Lab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 13:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-14142</guid>
		<description>[...] Everyone *but* Google should be open. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Everyone *but* Google should be open. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.344 seconds -->

