http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/ Wed, 08 Sep 2010 12:56:00 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-2/#comment-9666 Google vs Social Fri, 16 Jul 2010 15:56:03 +0000 http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-9666 [...] Millionen von Nutzern tagtäglich in den sozialen Netzwerken betreiben. “Betrachtet man die Umsatzstruktur, ergibt sich folgendes Bild: Google unternimmt alles, was der Kette der Werbung dient, vom [...] [...] Millionen von Nutzern tagtäglich in den sozialen Netzwerken betreiben. “Betrachtet man die Umsatzstruktur, ergibt sich folgendes Bild: Google unternimmt alles, was der Kette der Werbung dient, vom [...]

]]> http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-2/#comment-8684 » A Collection of Mobile Resources: Everything from Design, Development to Strategy Wed, 26 May 2010 23:32:03 +0000 http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-8684 [...] What is Strategic for Google? [...] [...] What is Strategic for Google? [...]

]]> http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-2/#comment-8431 Amazon Vs. Google: How Amazon's Growth Puts Google at Serious Risk | Startups Sun, 23 May 2010 01:16:19 +0000 http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-8431 [...] systems, web browsers, office apps, and so on.  Much of this makes sense, inasmuch as it is strategic for them to dominate or commoditize each layer that stands between human beings and online ads.  But while they are doing this, they [...] [...] systems, web browsers, office apps, and so on.  Much of this makes sense, inasmuch as it is strategic for them to dominate or commoditize each layer that stands between human beings and online ads.  But while they are doing this, they [...]

]]> http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-2/#comment-8295 While Google fights on the edges, Amazon is attacking their core cdixon.org – chris dixon's blog Sat, 22 May 2010 16:27:27 +0000 http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-8295 [...] systems, web browsers, office apps, and so on.  Much of this makes sense, inasmuch as it is strategic for them to dominate or commoditize each layer that stands between human beings and online ads.  But while they are doing this, they [...] [...] systems, web browsers, office apps, and so on.  Much of this makes sense, inasmuch as it is strategic for them to dominate or commoditize each layer that stands between human beings and online ads.  But while they are doing this, they [...]

]]> http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-2/#comment-8185 Squaring Up A Market by Michael Schaecher — Innovation Hype Fri, 14 May 2010 19:29:27 +0000 http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-8185 [...] [...] [...] [...]

]]> http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-2/#comment-7959 Commoditizing Dog Food Thu, 29 Apr 2010 02:27:45 +0000 http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-7959 [...] Are these folks doing it out of the goodness of their hearts?  Probably in part, but more likely they’re focused on “commoditizing the complement“. [...] [...] Are these folks doing it out of the goodness of their hearts?  Probably in part, but more likely they’re focused on “commoditizing the complement“. [...]

]]> http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-2/#comment-7899 The tradeoff between open and closed cdixon.org – chris dixon's blog Sun, 25 Apr 2010 19:59:29 +0000 http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-7899 [...] that they should commoditize (my full analysis of what Google should want to own vs commoditize is here).  Facebook’s social graph is their core asset so it’s optimal to close it and not [...] [...] that they should commoditize (my full analysis of what Google should want to own vs commoditize is here).  Facebook’s social graph is their core asset so it’s optimal to close it and not [...]

]]> http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-2/#comment-7858 Innovating in the Stack | Jeffrey Talajic Fri, 16 Apr 2010 21:37:53 +0000 http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-7858 [...] been thinking about stacks recently, ever since I read a piece by Chris Dixon on Google’s stack. From Dixon: Google makes 99% of their revenue selling text ads for things like airplane tickets, [...] [...] been thinking about stacks recently, ever since I read a piece by Chris Dixon on Google’s stack. From Dixon: Google makes 99% of their revenue selling text ads for things like airplane tickets, [...]

]]> http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-2/#comment-7781 Twitter: What's Next? | Startups Sun, 11 Apr 2010 01:06:58 +0000 http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-7781 [...] platform has an established business model, this analysis is fairly straightforward (for example, here is my strategic analysis of Google’s platform).  If you make games for the iPhone, you are [...] [...] platform has an established business model, this analysis is fairly straightforward (for example, here is my strategic analysis of Google’s platform).  If you make games for the iPhone, you are [...]

]]> http://cdixon.org/2009/12/30/whats-strategic-for-google/comment-page-2/#comment-7715 Twitter and third-party Twitter developers cdixon.org – chris dixon's blog Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:53:45 +0000 http://cdixon.org/?p=2438#comment-7715 [...] platform has an established business model, this analysis is fairly straightforward (for example, here is my strategic analysis of Google’s platform).  If you make games for the iPhone, you are [...] [...] platform has an established business model, this analysis is fairly straightforward (for example, here is my strategic analysis of Google’s platform).  If you make games for the iPhone, you are [...]

]]>