<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The next big thing will start out looking like a toy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:40:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Have a disruptive offering? Here are 5 tips for achieving widespread adoption &#171; Something Ventured</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/comment-page-2/#comment-17322</link>
		<dc:creator>Have a disruptive offering? Here are 5 tips for achieving widespread adoption &#171; Something Ventured</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 23:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2321#comment-17322</guid>
		<description>[...] why people would want to use a disruptive offering. That’s why they commonly start off being dismissed as toys. To progress beyond the tech fanboys who love to play with new stuff, you have to make people [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] why people would want to use a disruptive offering. That’s why they commonly start off being dismissed as toys. To progress beyond the tech fanboys who love to play with new stuff, you have to make people [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The iPad and Amazon Methods of Transforming Customer Behavior &#171; takingpitches</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/comment-page-2/#comment-17300</link>
		<dc:creator>The iPad and Amazon Methods of Transforming Customer Behavior &#171; takingpitches</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 05:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2321#comment-17300</guid>
		<description>[...] user resists, consistent with Clay Christensen&#8217;s observation that the disruptive invention first looks like a toy, harmless to incumbent competitors, unappealing for mainstream customer use because it might have [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] user resists, consistent with Clay Christensen&#8217;s observation that the disruptive invention first looks like a toy, harmless to incumbent competitors, unappealing for mainstream customer use because it might have [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Energy R&#38;D is a Good Thing, Even for Cleantech, Even Despite Solyndra &#124; EfficiencyLaw.com Energy R&#38;D is a Good Thing, Even for Cleantech, Even Despite Solyndra &#124; Energy Efficiency &#38; Cleantech</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/comment-page-2/#comment-16178</link>
		<dc:creator>Energy R&#38;D is a Good Thing, Even for Cleantech, Even Despite Solyndra &#124; EfficiencyLaw.com Energy R&#38;D is a Good Thing, Even for Cleantech, Even Despite Solyndra &#124; Energy Efficiency &#38; Cleantech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 02:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2321#comment-16178</guid>
		<description>[...] Clay Christensen points out, new technologies are, at first, dismissed as toys.  But cleantech is no longer just [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Clay Christensen points out, new technologies are, at first, dismissed as toys.  But cleantech is no longer just [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why is so much of Silicon Valley obsessed with small ideas that don&#039;t solve a problem? - Quora</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/comment-page-2/#comment-15663</link>
		<dc:creator>Why is so much of Silicon Valley obsessed with small ideas that don&#039;t solve a problem? - Quora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 19:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2321#comment-15663</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hackathon Yale &#187; Miles Lasater Blog</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/comment-page-2/#comment-15636</link>
		<dc:creator>Hackathon Yale &#187; Miles Lasater Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 01:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2321#comment-15636</guid>
		<description>[...] Dave Tisch from Techstars NYC kicked off the program urging everyone to build something that personal solves a problem or is a fun toy.  (Because as Chris Dixon says, the next big thing may start out looking like a toy.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dave Tisch from Techstars NYC kicked off the program urging everyone to build something that personal solves a problem or is a fun toy.  (Because as Chris Dixon says, the next big thing may start out looking like a toy.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Are you Siri-ous? Siri is just a toy, and that&#8217;s OK. &#171; @akumar overflow</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/comment-page-2/#comment-15514</link>
		<dc:creator>Are you Siri-ous? Siri is just a toy, and that&#8217;s OK. &#171; @akumar overflow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 02:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2321#comment-15514</guid>
		<description>[...] great post in Jan &#039;10 called &#039;The next big thing will start off looking like a toy&#039; (http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the&#8230;). Siri is a great example of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] great post in Jan &#039;10 called &#039;The next big thing will start off looking like a toy&#039; (<a href="http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the&#038;#8230" rel="nofollow">http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the&#038;#8230</a> <img src='http://cdixon.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> . Siri is a great example of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quora</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/comment-page-2/#comment-15513</link>
		<dc:creator>Quora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 02:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2321#comment-15513</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Are you Siri-ous? Siri is just a toy, and that&#039;s OK....&lt;/strong&gt;

Chris Dixon wrote a great post in Jan &#039;10 called &#039;The next big thing will start off looking like a toy&#039; (http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/). Siri is a great example of this. The leading indicator that...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Are you Siri-ous? Siri is just a toy, and that&#8217;s OK&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>Chris Dixon wrote a great post in Jan &#8217;10 called &#8216;The next big thing will start off looking like a toy&#8217; (<a href="http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/" rel="nofollow">http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/</a>). Siri is a great example of this. The leading indicator that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: True innovation often starts with kids&#8217; toys &#8230; &#171; AppCarousel</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/comment-page-2/#comment-15502</link>
		<dc:creator>True innovation often starts with kids&#8217; toys &#8230; &#171; AppCarousel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 13:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2321#comment-15502</guid>
		<description>[...] It reminds me of a blog article I read last year by Chris Dixon, the founder of Hunch, who said: &#8220;The next big thing will start out looking like a toy.&#8221;  A really interesting read at http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It reminds me of a blog article I read last year by Chris Dixon, the founder of Hunch, who said: &#8220;The next big thing will start out looking like a toy.&#8221;  A really interesting read at http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Higher Education’s Toughest Test &#124; TechCrunch</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/comment-page-2/#comment-14650</link>
		<dc:creator>Higher Education’s Toughest Test &#124; TechCrunch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 20:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2321#comment-14650</guid>
		<description>[...] tenet of Clayton Christensen’s theory of disruptive innovation is that potential disruptive threats are often dismissed as “toys.” If [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tenet of Clayton Christensen’s theory of disruptive innovation is that potential disruptive threats are often dismissed as “toys.” If [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bitcoin Wallet for Android</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/comment-page-2/#comment-14556</link>
		<dc:creator>Bitcoin Wallet for Android</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 07:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2321#comment-14556</guid>
		<description>[...] instantly, anywhere in the world. This is a potentially very disruptive technology, even if it looks like a toy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] instantly, anywhere in the world. This is a potentially very disruptive technology, even if it looks like a toy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cdixon.org &#8211; chris dixon&#039;s blog / The next big thing is sitting right in front of you</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/comment-page-2/#comment-14538</link>
		<dc:creator>cdixon.org &#8211; chris dixon&#039;s blog / The next big thing is sitting right in front of you</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2011 01:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2321#comment-14538</guid>
		<description>[...] reminder that the next big thing always starts out looking like a toy.   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reminder that the next big thing always starts out looking like a toy.   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Higher Education’s Toughest Test &#124; JetLib News</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/comment-page-2/#comment-14460</link>
		<dc:creator>Higher Education’s Toughest Test &#124; JetLib News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jun 2011 21:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2321#comment-14460</guid>
		<description>[...] tenet of Clayton Christensen&#8217;s theory of disruptive innovation is that potential disruptive threats are often dismissed as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tenet of Clayton Christensen&rsquo;s theory of disruptive innovation is that potential disruptive threats are often dismissed as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Higher Education’s Toughest Test &#124; JetLib News</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/comment-page-2/#comment-14461</link>
		<dc:creator>Higher Education’s Toughest Test &#124; JetLib News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jun 2011 21:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2321#comment-14461</guid>
		<description>[...] tenet of Clayton Christensen&#8217;s theory of disruptive innovation is that potential disruptive threats are often dismissed as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tenet of Clayton Christensen&rsquo;s theory of disruptive innovation is that potential disruptive threats are often dismissed as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Higher Education’s Toughest Test &#124; Tech Stuff</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/comment-page-2/#comment-13531</link>
		<dc:creator>Higher Education’s Toughest Test &#124; Tech Stuff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 03:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2321#comment-13531</guid>
		<description>[...] tenet of Clayton Christensen’s theory of disruptive innovation is that potential disruptive threats are often dismissed as “toys.” If [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tenet of Clayton Christensen’s theory of disruptive innovation is that potential disruptive threats are often dismissed as “toys.” If [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Higher Education’s Toughest Test &#124; Askingly.com</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/comment-page-2/#comment-13483</link>
		<dc:creator>Higher Education’s Toughest Test &#124; Askingly.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 19:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2321#comment-13483</guid>
		<description>[...] tenet of Clayton Christensen’s theory of disruptive innovation is that potential disruptive threats are often dismissed as “toys.” If [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tenet of Clayton Christensen’s theory of disruptive innovation is that potential disruptive threats are often dismissed as “toys.” If [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Higher Education’s Toughest Test &#124;</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/comment-page-2/#comment-13474</link>
		<dc:creator>Higher Education’s Toughest Test &#124;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 17:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2321#comment-13474</guid>
		<description>[...] tenet of Clayton Christensen’s theory of disruptive innovation is that potential disruptive threats are often dismissed as “toys.” If [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tenet of Clayton Christensen’s theory of disruptive innovation is that potential disruptive threats are often dismissed as “toys.” If [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Higher Education’s Toughest Test &#124; The Good NET Guide</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/comment-page-2/#comment-13472</link>
		<dc:creator>Higher Education’s Toughest Test &#124; The Good NET Guide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 16:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2321#comment-13472</guid>
		<description>[...] tenet of Clayton Christensen’s theory of disruptive innovation is that potential disruptive threats are often dismissed as “toys.” If [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tenet of Clayton Christensen’s theory of disruptive innovation is that potential disruptive threats are often dismissed as “toys.” If [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Higher Education’s Toughest Test &#124; MakeNoise</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/comment-page-2/#comment-13471</link>
		<dc:creator>Higher Education’s Toughest Test &#124; MakeNoise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 16:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2321#comment-13471</guid>
		<description>[...] tenet of Clayton Christensen’s theory of disruptive innovation is that potential disruptive threats are often dismissed as “toys.” If [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tenet of Clayton Christensen’s theory of disruptive innovation is that potential disruptive threats are often dismissed as “toys.” If [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Social BPM and HIMS and Routine Clerical Work &#187; Process for the Enterprise</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/comment-page-2/#comment-12170</link>
		<dc:creator>Social BPM and HIMS and Routine Clerical Work &#187; Process for the Enterprise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 04:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2321#comment-12170</guid>
		<description>[...] mature HumanEdj offering.  It is a fair criticism, but I&#8217;d point him to Chris Dixon&#8217;s blog post on the subject of &#8220;toys&#8221; : The reason big new things sneak by incumbents is that the next big thing always starts out being [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mature HumanEdj offering.  It is a fair criticism, but I&#8217;d point him to Chris Dixon&#8217;s blog post on the subject of &#8220;toys&#8221; : The reason big new things sneak by incumbents is that the next big thing always starts out being [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cdixon.org &#8211; chris dixon&#039;s blog / The &#8220;thin edge of the wedge&#8221; strategy</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/comment-page-2/#comment-11796</link>
		<dc:creator>cdixon.org &#8211; chris dixon&#039;s blog / The &#8220;thin edge of the wedge&#8221; strategy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 00:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2321#comment-11796</guid>
		<description>[...] a feature,&#8221; or that game mechanics on geo apps like Foursquare are just faddish &#8220;toys.&#8221; Some go so far as to argue that the tech startup world as a whole is going through phase of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a feature,&#8221; or that game mechanics on geo apps like Foursquare are just faddish &#8220;toys.&#8221; Some go so far as to argue that the tech startup world as a whole is going through phase of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Envisioning the future of Facebook Groups. - Cue The Future</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/comment-page-2/#comment-11552</link>
		<dc:creator>Envisioning the future of Facebook Groups. - Cue The Future</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 06:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2321#comment-11552</guid>
		<description>[...] 1. Vision: predict what your customers want before anyone knows they&#8217;d use it.  The next big thing looks like a toy. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 1. Vision: predict what your customers want before anyone knows they&#8217;d use it.  The next big thing looks like a toy. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Disruptive Improvements vs Iterative Improvements</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/comment-page-2/#comment-8038</link>
		<dc:creator>Disruptive Improvements vs Iterative Improvements</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 16:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2321#comment-8038</guid>
		<description>[...] worry though, your disruptive innovation will be treated like a toy at first if it&#8217;s good.  This entry was posted in Agile, Customer Development, Lean, business and tagged Disruptive [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] worry though, your disruptive innovation will be treated like a toy at first if it&#8217;s good.  This entry was posted in Agile, Customer Development, Lean, business and tagged Disruptive [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Follow Fridays &#8211; Chris Dixon and Hunch &#124; Sweet Spot Strategy</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/comment-page-2/#comment-7971</link>
		<dc:creator>Follow Fridays &#8211; Chris Dixon and Hunch &#124; Sweet Spot Strategy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 05:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2321#comment-7971</guid>
		<description>[...] The Next Big Thing Will Start Out Looking Like a Toy &#8211; Covers disruptive technology similar to my post on disruptive products [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Next Big Thing Will Start Out Looking Like a Toy &#8211; Covers disruptive technology similar to my post on disruptive products [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Disruptive Innovation &#124; Solomon Giles Design</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/comment-page-2/#comment-7887</link>
		<dc:creator>Disruptive Innovation &#124; Solomon Giles Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 14:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2321#comment-7887</guid>
		<description>[...] tend to get better at a faster rate than users’ needs increase. From this simple insight follows all kinds of interesting conclusions about how markets and products change over time.    22. Apr, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tend to get better at a faster rate than users’ needs increase. From this simple insight follows all kinds of interesting conclusions about how markets and products change over time.    22. Apr, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hyperbio &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Chris Dixon on the next big thing</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/comment-page-2/#comment-7842</link>
		<dc:creator>Hyperbio &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Chris Dixon on the next big thing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 12:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2321#comment-7842</guid>
		<description>[...] a startup founder you need to understand that: Disruptive technologies are dismissed as toys because when they are first launched they “undershoot” user needs. The first telephone could [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a startup founder you need to understand that: Disruptive technologies are dismissed as toys because when they are first launched they “undershoot” user needs. The first telephone could [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How Intel Screwed Itself Out Of The iPad Revolution (INTC, AAPL) &#171; Apple News Daily</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/comment-page-2/#comment-7694</link>
		<dc:creator>How Intel Screwed Itself Out Of The iPad Revolution (INTC, AAPL) &#171; Apple News Daily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 09:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2321#comment-7694</guid>
		<description>[...] XScale had mindshare, scale and design wins, but Intel gave up. Why focus on these PDA/toys when we can win [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] XScale had mindshare, scale and design wins, but Intel gave up. Why focus on these PDA/toys when we can win [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How Intel Screwed Itself Out Of The iPad Revolution&#160;&#124;&#160;oolaah</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/comment-page-2/#comment-7683</link>
		<dc:creator>How Intel Screwed Itself Out Of The iPad Revolution&#160;&#124;&#160;oolaah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 16:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2321#comment-7683</guid>
		<description>[...] XScale had mindshare, scale and design wins, but Intel gave up. Why focus on these PDA/toys when we can win [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] XScale had mindshare, scale and design wins, but Intel gave up. Why focus on these PDA/toys when we can win [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finance Geek » How Intel Screwed Itself Out Of The iPad Revolution (INTC, AAPL)</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/comment-page-2/#comment-7682</link>
		<dc:creator>Finance Geek » How Intel Screwed Itself Out Of The iPad Revolution (INTC, AAPL)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 14:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2321#comment-7682</guid>
		<description>[...] XScale had mindshare, scale and design wins, but Intel gave up. Why focus on these PDA/toys when we can win [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] XScale had mindshare, scale and design wins, but Intel gave up. Why focus on these PDA/toys when we can win [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finance Geek » How&#8217;s My Fake VC Portfolio Doing?</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/comment-page-2/#comment-7681</link>
		<dc:creator>Finance Geek » How&#8217;s My Fake VC Portfolio Doing?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 13:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2321#comment-7681</guid>
		<description>[...] The opportunity: financial information is a huge market. And when the biggest incumbent deliberately keeps its product broken to lock its customers in, you know it&#8217;s ripe for disruption. As we know, the future of information is real time and social, and financial information is no different. By first piggy-backing on Twitter and now building its own platform, StockTwits has created a dead simple, useful platform for real time, social market information. Of course, StockTwits can&#8217;t compete head on with Bloomberg (yet!): it&#8217;s mostly just a fun and useful toy for day traders. But from the telephone (described by the President of Western Union as a &#8220;toy&#8221;) on down to perhaps the iPad, the great disrupting innovations started out as toys. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The opportunity: financial information is a huge market. And when the biggest incumbent deliberately keeps its product broken to lock its customers in, you know it&#8217;s ripe for disruption. As we know, the future of information is real time and social, and financial information is no different. By first piggy-backing on Twitter and now building its own platform, StockTwits has created a dead simple, useful platform for real time, social market information. Of course, StockTwits can&#8217;t compete head on with Bloomberg (yet!): it&#8217;s mostly just a fun and useful toy for day traders. But from the telephone (described by the President of Western Union as a &#8220;toy&#8221;) on down to perhaps the iPad, the great disrupting innovations started out as toys. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internet Predictions from 1995 &#171; Five Years Too Late</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/comment-page-2/#comment-7084</link>
		<dc:creator>Internet Predictions from 1995 &#171; Five Years Too Late</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 11:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2321#comment-7084</guid>
		<description>[...] and mid 90s. As Chris Dixon would say &#8211; the old economy (and its media) thought the Internet was a toy. Flash forward fifteen years and the Internet does all the things Stoll highlights. Instant catalog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and mid 90s. As Chris Dixon would say &#8211; the old economy (and its media) thought the Internet was a toy. Flash forward fifteen years and the Internet does all the things Stoll highlights. Instant catalog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Every time an engineer joins Google, a startup dies cdixon.org &#8211; chris dixon&#39;s blog</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/comment-page-2/#comment-6828</link>
		<dc:creator>Every time an engineer joins Google, a startup dies cdixon.org &#8211; chris dixon&#39;s blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 00:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2321#comment-6828</guid>
		<description>[...]  The bigger the company, the more likely it suffers from agency issues, strategy taxes, and myopia. But most of all: nothing is more motivating and inspiring than the sense of ownership and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  The bigger the company, the more likely it suffers from agency issues, strategy taxes, and myopia. But most of all: nothing is more motivating and inspiring than the sense of ownership and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iPad: A New Toy or Opportunities for the Taking? &#171; Social Media Marketing</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/comment-page-2/#comment-6595</link>
		<dc:creator>iPad: A New Toy or Opportunities for the Taking? &#171; Social Media Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2321#comment-6595</guid>
		<description>[...] Dixon wrote  earlier this month that the next big thing will likely be dismissed as a toy&#8211;too often we [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dixon wrote  earlier this month that the next big thing will likely be dismissed as a toy&#8211;too often we [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Incumbents cdixon.org &#8211; chris dixon&#39;s blog</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/comment-page-2/#comment-6163</link>
		<dc:creator>Incumbents cdixon.org &#8211; chris dixon&#39;s blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 13:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2321#comment-6163</guid>
		<description>[...] disruptive, you most likely will go unnoticed by the incumbents for a long time (because it looks to them like a toy). If the your technology is sustaining and you get noticed early you probably want to try to sell [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] disruptive, you most likely will go unnoticed by the incumbents for a long time (because it looks to them like a toy). If the your technology is sustaining and you get noticed early you probably want to try to sell [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Four Tech &#8220;Toys&#8221; That Turned Out to Be the Next Big Thing &#124; Exectweets</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/comment-page-2/#comment-6148</link>
		<dc:creator>Four Tech &#8220;Toys&#8221; That Turned Out to Be the Next Big Thing &#124; Exectweets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2321#comment-6148</guid>
		<description>[...] at Techdirt, we&#8217;re discussing Chris Dixon&#8217;s excellent point that the next big thing will start out looking like a toy. His point is that truly disruptive innovations don&#8217;t necessarily start out that way, and to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at Techdirt, we&#8217;re discussing Chris Dixon&#8217;s excellent point that the next big thing will start out looking like a toy. His point is that truly disruptive innovations don&#8217;t necessarily start out that way, and to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Minimalist Design:sure, Feature Focused:ok, but which APIs/Platforms? &#187; Victus Spiritus</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/comment-page-1/#comment-6135</link>
		<dc:creator>Minimalist Design:sure, Feature Focused:ok, but which APIs/Platforms? &#187; Victus Spiritus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 18:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2321#comment-6135</guid>
		<description>[...] inspiration behind this improv thought riff is Chris Dixon&#8217;s post &#8220;the next big thing will start out looking like a toy&#8221;. In it Chris talked about how the most disruptive startups and technologies appear incapable of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] inspiration behind this improv thought riff is Chris Dixon&#8217;s post &#8220;the next big thing will start out looking like a toy&#8221;. In it Chris talked about how the most disruptive startups and technologies appear incapable of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Disruptive Innovations Always Look Like Toys</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/comment-page-1/#comment-6004</link>
		<dc:creator>Disruptive Innovations Always Look Like Toys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 06:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2321#comment-6004</guid>
		<description>[...] concise and accurate review of Clayton Christensen&#039;s concept of disruptive innovation, disruptive technologies initially are viewed as &quot;toys&quot; in the minds of the entrenched market leaders:  &quot;The reason big new things sneak by incumbents [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] concise and accurate review of Clayton Christensen&#39;s concept of disruptive innovation, disruptive technologies initially are viewed as &quot;toys&quot; in the minds of the entrenched market leaders:  &quot;The reason big new things sneak by incumbents [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Process for the Enterprise &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Toys of Today</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/comment-page-1/#comment-5955</link>
		<dc:creator>Process for the Enterprise &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Toys of Today</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2321#comment-5955</guid>
		<description>[...] of Today January 18th, 2010 by Scott Francis  Chris Dixon recently wrote that the next big thing will start out looking like a toy.  No, he&#8217;s not presaging the rise of toys as the next trend in retail or tech (although, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of Today January 18th, 2010 by Scott Francis  Chris Dixon recently wrote that the next big thing will start out looking like a toy.  No, he&#8217;s not presaging the rise of toys as the next trend in retail or tech (although, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Collective knowledge systems cdixon.org &#8211; chris dixon&#39;s blog</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/comment-page-1/#comment-5934</link>
		<dc:creator>Collective knowledge systems cdixon.org &#8211; chris dixon&#39;s blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 16:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2321#comment-5934</guid>
		<description>[...] most people thought Wikipedia was a wacky project that would at best end up being a quirky &#8220;toy&#8221; encyclopedia. Instead it has become a remarkably comprehensive and accurate resource that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] most people thought Wikipedia was a wacky project that would at best end up being a quirky &#8220;toy&#8221; encyclopedia. Instead it has become a remarkably comprehensive and accurate resource that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The next big thing will start out looking like a toy &#124; Igniting Startups - nPost</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/comment-page-1/#comment-5919</link>
		<dc:creator>The next big thing will start out looking like a toy &#124; Igniting Startups - nPost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 15:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2321#comment-5919</guid>
		<description>[...] From cdixon.org [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] From cdixon.org [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The next big thing will start out looking like a toy &#124; Digital Asset Management</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/comment-page-1/#comment-5885</link>
		<dc:creator>The next big thing will start out looking like a toy &#124; Digital Asset Management</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 08:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2321#comment-5885</guid>
		<description>[...] The next big thing will start out looking like a toy cdixon.org – chris dixon&#8217;s blog. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The next big thing will start out looking like a toy cdixon.org – chris dixon&#8217;s blog. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flow &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Daily Digest for January 7th - The zeitgeist daily</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/comment-page-1/#comment-5845</link>
		<dc:creator>Flow &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Daily Digest for January 7th - The zeitgeist daily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 13:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2321#comment-5845</guid>
		<description>[...] Shared The next big thing will start out looking like a toy. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Shared The next big thing will start out looking like a toy. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShanaC</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/comment-page-1/#comment-5842</link>
		<dc:creator>ShanaC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 05:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2321#comment-5842</guid>
		<description>You know, I don&#039;t own a Wacom Pad but I think a heavily interfaced and touch screen enabled Wacom like device would be a lot of fun.  Especially if it had some sort of plasticly physical pushback no matter where you touched or wrote/drew on it, and was web enabled.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The reason we use mice is that the shoulder-wrist movements are the limiting factor of screen movements if you want an external device that can move on an xy coordinate system. A pencil/stylus is actually better because you can use your fingers too, but its much harder without the pushback of the material- and coloring is always a children&#039;s activity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I don&#39;t own a Wacom Pad but I think a heavily interfaced and touch screen enabled Wacom like device would be a lot of fun.  Especially if it had some sort of plasticly physical pushback no matter where you touched or wrote/drew on it, and was web enabled.  </p>
<p>The reason we use mice is that the shoulder-wrist movements are the limiting factor of screen movements if you want an external device that can move on an xy coordinate system. A pencil/stylus is actually better because you can use your fingers too, but its much harder without the pushback of the material- and coloring is always a children&#39;s activity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShanaC</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/comment-page-1/#comment-5841</link>
		<dc:creator>ShanaC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 05:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2321#comment-5841</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re a smart guy about predicting the future when it comes to the social sciences</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#39;re a smart guy about predicting the future when it comes to the social sciences</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: taicrane</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/comment-page-1/#comment-5840</link>
		<dc:creator>taicrane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 02:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2321#comment-5840</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s an interesting insight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#39;s an interesting insight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: taicrane</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/comment-page-1/#comment-5839</link>
		<dc:creator>taicrane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 02:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2321#comment-5839</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s an interesting insight!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#39;s an interesting insight!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Print publishers disrupted — Lars Tong Strömberg</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/comment-page-1/#comment-5835</link>
		<dc:creator>Print publishers disrupted — Lars Tong Strömberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 13:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2321#comment-5835</guid>
		<description>[...] Today I really had one of those moments reading first a post in Galleycat with some very strange predictions by Richard Curtis´ on book publishing 10 years in the future contrasted by an, in my view, a lot more enlightened piece by Chris Dixon building on Clayton M. Christensen´s theories on disruptive technologies. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Today I really had one of those moments reading first a post in Galleycat with some very strange predictions by Richard Curtis´ on book publishing 10 years in the future contrasted by an, in my view, a lot more enlightened piece by Chris Dixon building on Clayton M. Christensen´s theories on disruptive technologies. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: choard</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/comment-page-1/#comment-5752</link>
		<dc:creator>choard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 19:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2321#comment-5752</guid>
		<description>Great read Chris, and spot on!  I remember when car phones were just &#039;toys for the rich&#039;, until the next generation of computer processors was fast enough to switch calls smoothly from one cell site to another with a minimum of call drops.  Then cell phones disrupted the pay phone side, and now, the whole landline side.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;IMHO, one of the next &#039;toys&#039; could well be the next generation of Bluetooth, allowing a tighter integration of cell phone with automotive vehicle, passing those apps to the brains of the car.  It will be interesting to see whether it comes from a new young upstart, Sirius/XM, or if the newly smaller Big Three are now rightsized enough to be innovative or are still too conservative to set up a skunk works of their own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great read Chris, and spot on!  I remember when car phones were just &#39;toys for the rich&#39;, until the next generation of computer processors was fast enough to switch calls smoothly from one cell site to another with a minimum of call drops.  Then cell phones disrupted the pay phone side, and now, the whole landline side.  </p>
<p>IMHO, one of the next &#39;toys&#39; could well be the next generation of Bluetooth, allowing a tighter integration of cell phone with automotive vehicle, passing those apps to the brains of the car.  It will be interesting to see whether it comes from a new young upstart, Sirius/XM, or if the newly smaller Big Three are now rightsized enough to be innovative or are still too conservative to set up a skunk works of their own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Next Big Thing : clusterflock</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/comment-page-1/#comment-5776</link>
		<dc:creator>The Next Big Thing : clusterflock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 17:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2321#comment-5776</guid>
		<description>[...] Why it is often dismissed: The reason big new things sneak by incumbents is that the next big thing always starts out being dismissed as a “toy.” This is one of the main insights of Clay Christensen’s “disruptive technology” theory. This theory starts with the observation that technologies tend to get better at a faster rate than users’ needs increase. From this simple insight follows all kinds of interesting conclusions about how markets and products change over time. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why it is often dismissed: The reason big new things sneak by incumbents is that the next big thing always starts out being dismissed as a “toy.” This is one of the main insights of Clay Christensen’s “disruptive technology” theory. This theory starts with the observation that technologies tend to get better at a faster rate than users’ needs increase. From this simple insight follows all kinds of interesting conclusions about how markets and products change over time. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: twoElectric</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/comment-page-1/#comment-5751</link>
		<dc:creator>twoElectric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 15:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2321#comment-5751</guid>
		<description>Good response. I suppose you mean: &quot;The next big thing will start out looking like a trifle&quot;. But I still think it&#039;s a bit snarky. I think 99% of big things, big things that were not once big, started small and scrawny, ala the Ugly Duckling.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, Erich said Twitter was great and also his company paid an undisclosed sum of money to Twitter recently for real-time search of Twitter feeds. On the other hand, 140 characters or less is not actually something innovative, it&#039;s really just another social network, and it&#039;s only the 3rd most popular one. If someone else makes a different social network with a slightly different take on the messaging protocol, when can we say that it has become the next big thing!!! Experts agree that Twitter is not serious enough for businesses (&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9595_22-334651.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9595_22-334651.html&lt;/a&gt;), though smiley faces :-P are kosher in some workplaces.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In my opinion it takes a bit more than lightheartedness to become the proverbial next big thing. Some companies tried to take SecondLife seriously, but it just isn&#039;t ready for prime time! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And my final remark for today is that robots are likely to become one of the next big things. Few people today have a Roomba robot vacuum cleaner, and many types of robots can be found in toystores rather than in a hardware store or department store (toy section excluded). Therefore, I&#039;d argue that quite literally one of the next big things today looks like a toy (outside Japan, where robots are already big and untoylike) will be personal robots in the home for cleaning, cooking, aged care, child care, entertainment, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good response. I suppose you mean: &#8220;The next big thing will start out looking like a trifle&#8221;. But I still think it&#39;s a bit snarky. I think 99% of big things, big things that were not once big, started small and scrawny, ala the Ugly Duckling.</p>
<p>However, Erich said Twitter was great and also his company paid an undisclosed sum of money to Twitter recently for real-time search of Twitter feeds. On the other hand, 140 characters or less is not actually something innovative, it&#39;s really just another social network, and it&#39;s only the 3rd most popular one. If someone else makes a different social network with a slightly different take on the messaging protocol, when can we say that it has become the next big thing!!! Experts agree that Twitter is not serious enough for businesses (<a href="http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9595_22-334651.html" rel="nofollow">http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9595_22-334651.html</a>), though smiley faces <img src='http://cdixon.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' />  are kosher in some workplaces.</p>
<p>In my opinion it takes a bit more than lightheartedness to become the proverbial next big thing. Some companies tried to take SecondLife seriously, but it just isn&#39;t ready for prime time! </p>
<p>And my final remark for today is that robots are likely to become one of the next big things. Few people today have a Roomba robot vacuum cleaner, and many types of robots can be found in toystores rather than in a hardware store or department store (toy section excluded). Therefore, I&#39;d argue that quite literally one of the next big things today looks like a toy (outside Japan, where robots are already big and untoylike) will be personal robots in the home for cleaning, cooking, aged care, child care, entertainment, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris dixon</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2010/01/03/the-next-big-thing-will-start-out-looking-like-a-toy/comment-page-1/#comment-5750</link>
		<dc:creator>chris dixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdixon.org/?p=2321#comment-5750</guid>
		<description>I am using &quot;toy&quot; to mean something dismissed by &quot;serious&quot; people at the time.  The way Erich Schmidt dismissed Twitter as a &quot;poor man&#039;s email.&quot;  Not necessarily something fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am using &#8220;toy&#8221; to mean something dismissed by &#8220;serious&#8221; people at the time.  The way Erich Schmidt dismissed Twitter as a &#8220;poor man&#39;s email.&#8221;  Not necessarily something fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.414 seconds -->

