tech

A massive misallocation of online advertising dollars

In an earlier blog post, I talked about how sites that generate purchasing intent (mainly “content” sites) are being under-allocated advertising dollars versus sites that harvest purchasing intent (search engines, coupon sites, comparison shopping sites, etc).  As a result, most content sites are left haggling over CPM-based brand advertising instead of sponsored links for the bulk of their revenue.

But there is an additional problem:  even among sites that monetize via sponsored links there is a large overallocation of advertising spending on links that are near the “end of the purchasing process” (or “end of the funnel”). For example, an average camera buyer takes 30 days and clicks on approximately 3 sponsored links from the beginning of researching cameras to actually purchasing one.   Yet in most cases only the last click gets credit, by which I mean:  1) if it’s an affiliate (CPA) deal, it is literally usually the case that only the last affiliate (the site that drops the last cookie) gets paid, 2) if it’s a CPC or CPM deal, most advertisers don’t properly track the users across multiple site visits so simply attribute conversion to the most recent click, causing them to over-allocate to end-of-funnel links 3) if it’s a non-sponsored link (like Google natural search links) the advertiser might over-credit SEO when in fact the natural search click was just the final navigational step in a long process that involved sponsored links along the way.

What this means is there are two huge misallocations of advertising dollars online: the first from intent generators to intent harvesters; the second from intent harvesters that are at the beginning or middle of the purchasing process to those at the end of the purchasing process.  This is not just a problem for internet advertisers and businesses – it affects all internet users.  Where advertising dollars flow, money gets invested. It is well known that content sites are suffering, many are even on their way to dying. Additionally, product/service sites that started off focusing on research are forced to move more and more toward end-of-funnel activities.  Take a look at how sites like TripAdvisor and CNET have devoted increasing real estate to the final purchasing click instead of research.  For the most part, you don’t get paid for the actual research since it’s too high in the funnel.

As with all large problems, this misallocation of advertising dollars also presents a number of opportunities.  One opportunity is for advertisers to correctly attribute their spending by tracking users through the entire purchasing process (in the case of cameras, the full 30 days and multiple sponsored clicks).  Very likely, these sites are currently overpaying end-of-funnel sites (e.g. coupon sites) and underpaying top-of-funnel sites (e.g. research sites). There is also an opportunity for companies that provide technology to help track this better. Finally, if over time advertising dollars do indeed shift to being correctly allocated, this will allow research sites to be pure research sites, content sites to be pure content sites, etc instead of everyone trying to clutter their sites with repetitive, “last click” functionality.


Categories: tech

7 replies »

  1. Not only does it replaces an obsolete system with brand-new technology, but also provide them the tools and the equipment you already have.
    You may be wondering why Toshiba should be
    your first choice for a business of any size should
    avaya phone system 2420 take advantage of emerging
    trends like VOIP? With the current economic difficulties that we are facing now it is just blatant the land lines or traditional phone systems.
    Just a phone line any more, which reduces long distance costs as well.

  2. So you traveling to aspect for the most popular commons in your
    area that you can do it you to faithful your hired hand
    up. All story in that I’m but kidding. If you’re concerned, intonation it.
    In That Respect are literally millions of telecastings out genuinely believe In That Location’s just one mortal that can decide this argument– And who’s that?
    It follows with a feature some imposter twitter followers chequer photos.

  3. […] » Chris Dixon posted an interesting blog last week on why he believes online advertising spend is being misallocated. He argues the point that those sites at the top of the sales funnel are not being adequately rewarded for creating the buying intent in the first place. This lost revenue is having an adverse affect on the businesses of struggling publishers, and is ultimately jeopardising the existence of pure-play content sites. The solution: better attribution. In Dixon’s view, tracking users through the entire purchasing process will help reward those intent creators at the top of the funnel. It’s a timely post, given the current debate around publisher revenue, and has some excellent observations from key industry players in the comments. (Chris Dixon Blog) […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s