Chris Dixon

The “thin edge of the wedge” strategy

Establishing relationships with new users is the hardest part of growing a startup.  For consumer products establishing relationships can mean many things: installs, registrations, purchases, or even just getting users to think of your website as a place to go for certain purposes.  For B2B products, establishing relationships means getting internal users or testers and eventually contracts and payments. For business development partners – for example API/widget partners – establishing relationships usually means getting functionality embedded in partners’ products (e.g. a widget on their website).

One common strategy for establishing this initial relationship is what is sometimes known as the “thin edge of the wedge” strategy (aka the “tip of the spear” strategy).  This strategy is analogous to the bowling pin strategy: both are about attacking a smaller problem first and then expanding out.  The difference is that the wedge strategy is about product tactics while the bowling pin strategy is about marketing tactics.

Sometimes the wedge can be a simple feature that existing companies overlooked or saw as inconsequential. The ability to share photos on social networks was (strangely) missing from the default iPhone camera app (and sharing was missing from many third-party camera apps like Hipstimatic that have popular features like lo-fi camera filters), so Instagram and Picplz filled the void. Presumably, these startups are going to try to use mobile photo sharing as the wedge into larger products (perhaps full-fledged social networks?).

Sometimes the wedge is a “single player mode” – a famous example is early adopters who used Delicious to store browser bookmarks in the cloud and then only later – once the user base hit critical mass – used its social bookmarking features. Other times the wedge lies on one side of a two-sided market, in which case the wedge strategy could be thought of as a variant of the “ladies night” strategy. I’m told that OpenTable initially used the wedge strategy by providing restaurants with terminals that acted like simple, single-player CRM systems. Once they acquired a critical mass of restaurants in key cities (judiciously chosen using the bowling pin strategy), opentable.com had sufficient inventory to become useful as a one-stop shop for consumers.

Critics sometimes confuse wedge features with final products. For example, some argue that mobile photo sharing is “just a feature,” or that game mechanics on geo apps like Foursquare are just faddish “toys.” Some go so far as to argue that the tech startup world as a whole is going through a phase of just building “dinky” features and companies. Perhaps some startups have no plan and really are just building features, likely with the hope of flipping themselves to larger companies. Good startups, however, think about the whole wedge from the start. They build an initial user base with simple features and then quickly iterate to create products that are enduringly useful, thereby creating companies that have stand-alone, defensible value.

  • http://twitter.com/L1AD LIAD

    The good stuff. Right here.

  • http://twitter.com/jkatzur Jonathan Katzur

    Very interesting blog post! I am glad there is a bit of a backlash against criticisms of “single feature” startups. Especially given the success of companies like Twitter and (like you said) OpenTable. The reason the company as feature problem seems so bad is because you get covered in TechCrunch when you are funded or acquired, but much harder to get coverage for understanding your market and methodically building out a company from a feature.

    Also, the natural risk-aversion of many entrepreneurs, even possibly those intending to engage in this strategy, causes them to be very happy with a multi million dollar payout after 1-3 years of working on a feature. The acquirer often just fails to understand the wedge and eventually nixes the service (like Yahoo).

    I think if there is a way to combat this from an investor perspective, it is to allow founders to take some money off the table, as Mark Suster argues http://bit.ly/dNNXYa. I was really happy to see FourSquare do this this year, and hope that pushes them to become a big force and not just a Facebook feature.

    • http://www.lodgephoto.com Ml

      I suppose it depends what you mean by “success” of single feature start-ups. Way too early to say Twitter is a success in the sense that it’s still a gaping money pit that has swallowed many millions.

      As someone else mentioned, my favorite product strategy is a thin end that generates cashflow. Makes the rest of the product strategy so much easier to execute :-) These are hard to find, and I greatly admire companies that are disciplined enough to find and work those. That’s why I have so little time for start-ups who have a thin end approach and a plan to take lots of investor cash before they get to the money-making part (if ever). That’s just called a strategy to lose money.

      • http://www.jkatzur.tumblr.com Jon Katzur

        I think it depends on the product. Things that benefit greatly from network effects (like Facebook/Flikr/Twitter/Tumblr) should be focused on achieving stickiness for their users even more than early stage profitability. The real question is what is a the lifetime value of a user, and if you make your product sticky enough you don’t need to worry about the absolute short term. Facebook is the obvious example- I would never even consider leaving Facebook. How would I communicate with my friends or know what is going on? Maybe they didn’t make any money on me at first, but they focused on their product and “got” a whole generation of users.

        Clearly this type of company is higher risk for the investor, but it is much higher reward as well, and Accel and other early stage investors made enough from this one investment to achieve huge profit on their entire fund.

        I will agree that the thin end that generates cachflow is an incredible opportunity- but I think those are more common in B2B applications and eCommerce type startups. Consumer web startups very often need a significant user base to add value, and these companies should focus on creating strong ties with their users, not optimizing for revenue too early and reaching a local maximum revenue point. Obviously, it’s a tough balance.

  • http://blog.botfu.com Kevin Marshall

    Another great post…but the real reason I’m commenting is that, for some reason this is the first time I’ve seen the ‘people who liked this also liked’ hunch powered feature…and I love it! I’m going to have to dig into that a lot more I think ;-)

  • http://hapnin.com/users/2 theschnaz

    The people from Hashable talked about this strategy at the last NYC Lean Startup Meetup. They kept refining and narrowing their product to one specific use case, introductions. From there, they’re now expanding their wedge by supporting new use cases; justmet, drinks, etc.

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention The “thin edge of the wedge" strategy -- Topsy.com

  • http://www.aaronklein.com/ Aaron Klein

    Love the title.

    The killer thing is when the “thin edge” is insanely profitable.

    That can really help the rest of the product develop nicely…

  • http://www.cognation.net deancollins

    any advice on how to make the jump from feature 1 to 20?

    http://www.LiveFootballChat.com (and our other 12 sites) have always been stage 1……. (we’re still beta so not ready to discuss V1.1 yet) buthow do we “best prepare” the market for what we are really building in the abckground?

  • http://www.facebook.com/Danielrhodes Daniel Rhodes

    This thin-wedge strategy is similar to how restaurants use food as a loss-leader in order to up-sell alcohol, which produces them a profit. Food is the draw to go to a restaurant, but the alcohol is where the money is made.

    • http://www.lodgephoto.com ML

      Successful restaurants make money on both!

  • http://aoteastudios.com Alex

    I enjoyed this post. I think it’s good to keep in mind that you can come up with a feature that will augment your marketing effort in order to gain initial traction.

  • http://thedreaminaction.com/ Ryan Graves

    Great post Chris. I have a pretty good idea of what our edge of the wedge is with Uber.

    Also, love the hunch plugin (above) how can I install?

    • http://www.cdixon.org chris dixon

      Great question. We need to add a link in the widget for creating your own widget, but for now here is the link for adding the widget to your own blog:
      http://hunch.com/apps/blog/add/

      • http://thedreaminaction.com/ Ryan Graves

        Awesome! Thanks Chris.

  • Jonathan Cohen

    Thanks for this post… Really useful point of view.

  • Pingback: Daily Digest for December 28th – 4% Inspiration

  • http://twitter.com/MargaretMolloy Margaret Molloy

    Thanks for great post. To me the distinction between the “thin edge” and the perennial loss leader is a tad unclear. Semantic or a meaningful distinction?

    • http://www.cdixon.org chris dixon

      Great question – definitely closely related concepts. Perhaps you could argue it’s semantics but I do think it would be weird to think of, say, picture sharing as “loss leader” for social networking. Main differences are loss leaders are generally pricing strategy for goods that actually have cost of sales (as opposed to information goods) and they are based around a single transaction (getting you into a store – hence the word “leader” as in “lead gen”). I would think of wedge as product design strategy vs loss leader as marketing/pricing strategy.

  • http://twitter.com/carinecarmy Carine Carmy

    Very helpful post, thanks! It makes me wonder — with the proliferation of B2C wedge companies and products fulfilling pointed needs, are there any companies trying to serve as hub for users’ wedge products? Essentially a starting point for features or products that are not yet embedded in the a users’ daily habits? I’d personally love something to help me keep track of everything, although I guess if it’s actually meeting or creating a need, I might not need a reminder.

  • Pingback: Product Progression - Datum – Jay Meattle’s Blog

  • Pingback: Havas Media Lab » Disruption Landscape - 01/03/2011

  • http://twitter.com/AndrewKorf Andrew Korf

    Definitely helpful as we are starting to think about what we @pedalr want to be when we grow up and exactly what our business model is. As a side note – I have been working with a recommendation engine startup here in Minneapolis and wonder who you see as the innovators in the space are? Certainly Hunch is a favorite of ours.

  • Supsale

    SELL PayPal Account with CC or Balance 10$ each

    contact:supsale@ymail.com

  • http://www.hypedsound.com jonathanjaeger

    I think because of Instagram’s unique look for their photos, they might be a fad if they don’t come up with a bigger picture offering (no pun intended). To be honest, I’m already sick of Instagram photos on Twitter. I think the best move would be to flip to bigger companies rather than create “full-fledged social networks” — UNLESS there is some dramatic difference that will bring people over to spend their time (and possibly money).

  • Geekette

    Wedgy semantics. SuperAnalogousticChrispyalidocious.

  • http://twitter.com/CouponCouponUK CouponCouponUK

    FourSquare is a really impressive company. Geotargeted content companies are going to become more and more relevant as smartphones get bigger and “on the go” web content becomes more and more usable. I’d love to be in the grocery, snap a photo of a product and immediately see 20 reviews pop up on my phone.

  • Balduzzi

    Currently brainstorming where to slice off the thin edge of my own start-up, SameGrain and found this post very helpful. In my opinion, it is a critical discussion point and should be at the core of every start-up marketing/biz dev strategy.

  • Pingback: The Thin Wedge Of Quora | The Good NET Guide

  • Pingback: The Thin Wedge Of Quora | JetLib News

  • http://twitter.com/itsdeshazer Michael De’Shazer

    Speak the truth!

  • Pingback: The Thin Wedge Of Quora | Darel Philip

  • Pingback: The Thin Wedge Of Quora | BrettMBell.com

  • Pingback: The Thin Wedge Of Quora / Brainyloft Press SOHO / Feed Your Brain

  • Pingback: The Thin Wedge Of Quora | 香港新媒體協會

  • Pingback: The Thin Wedge Of Quora |

  • http://twitter.com/MoishiFriedman MoishiFriedman

    brilliant post by #cdixon

  • Pingback: Quora Of The Thin Wedge

  • Pingback: The Thin Wedge Of Quora | Free Layouts For Facebook Fan Pages

  • Pingback: Oh, Sugar! » The Thin Wedge Of Quora

  • Pingback: The Thin Wedge Of Quora | Ebay shopping tips

  • Pingback: The Thin Wedge Of Quora | hidekibonsai.com

  • http://crowdbooster.com/ Ricky Yean

    Thanks Chris for a great post. Thinking about the “thin wedge” for our company, I think it might be important to try to understand why the thin wedge was overlooked by existing companies in the first place. Trying to explain this can help you articulate it and avoid building a thin wedge that wasn’t critical in the first place.

  • Pingback: Today’s Links | SnipBids Blog

  • http://www.facebook.se/hampus.jakobsson Hampus Jakobsson

    Wonderful post! This is my most common advice for all startups I coach – to see a grand vision and fix a thin wedge in that direction, and importantly not focus too much on the grand vision so that you still can change it when you pivot!

  • Pingback: The Thin Wedge Of Quora | Charged - your digital lifestyle at work or play

  • Pingback: 【Quora連載第2回】Quoraをビジネスの切り口にする

  • Pingback: The Thin Wedge Of Quora | Daringminds.com

  • Pingback: The Thin Edge of The Wedge « Physical Digital

  • http://www.WhatDidEricSay.com Eric Miltsch

    Is it proven that greater success comes to these “wedge” solutions when they are providing value & are also 1st to market? Seems like a logical “success combo.”

  • Pingback: Picture This: When Consumers Have Questions, Do Brands Have Answers? « Brian Solis Brian Solis

  • Pingback: Picture This: When Consumers Have Questions, Do Brands Have Answers? | Constellation Research

  • http://technbiz.blogspot.com paramendra

    Instagram has the rudiments of a full fledged social network, true.

  • Pingback: Skurt Sebastian Kurt – Berliner Gründer, Unternehmer, Sportler » Blog Archive » Lesezeichen zum Diskutieren vom 31. Januar 2011 from 19:29

  • Pingback: The Thin Wedge Of Quora | Tech stuff center

  • Pingback: You Can’t “Feature” Your Way to Success | Market By Numbers