The problem with tranched VC investments


In venture capital, tranching refers to investments where portions of the money are released over time when certain pre-negotiated milestones are hit.  Usually it will all be part of one Series of investment, so a company might raise, say, $5M in the Series A but actually only receive, say, half up front and half when they’ve hit certain milestones.  Sometimes something similar to tranching is simulated, for example when a VC makes a seed investment and pre-negotiates the Series A valuation, along with milestones necessary to trigger it.

In theory, tranching gives the VC’s a way to mitigate risk and the entrepreneur the comfort of not having to do a roadshow for the next round of financing.  In practice, I’ve found tranching to be a really bad idea.

First of all, the entrepreneur should realize that the milestones written in the document are merely guidelines and ultimately the VC has complete control over whether to fund the follow on tranches.  Imagine a scenario where the entrepreneur hits the milestones but for whatever reason the VC gets cold feet and doesn’t want to fund the follow on tranche.  What is the entrepreneur going to do – sue the VC?  First of all they have vastly deeper pockets than you, so at best you will get tied up in court for a long time while your startup goes down the tubes.  Not to mention that it would effectively blacklist you in the VC community.  So just realize that contracts are the right to sue and nothing more.  The only money you can depend on is the money sitting in your bank account.

Here are some other reasons both entrepreneurs and investors should dislike tranching:

  1. Makes hiring more difficult: Hiring is super critical at an early stage.  A very reasonable question prospective employees often (and should) ask  is “How many months of cash do you have in the bank?”  How do you respond if the money is tranched?  In my first startup, our full round gave us 18 months of cash but the first trance only a few months.  Should I have said what I had in the bank- just a few months – and scare the prospective hire?  Or should I have tried to explain “Oh, we have 18 months, but there is this thing called tranching, blah blah blah, and I’m sure the VCs will pony up.”  Not very reassuring either way.
  2. Distracts the entrepreneur:  The entrepreneur is forced to spend time making sure she gets the follow-on tranches.  In many cases, she even has to go present to the VC partnership multiple times (each time requiring lots of prep time).  Also, savvy entrepreneurs will prepare multiple options in case the VC decides not to fund, so will spend time talking to other potential investors to keep them warm.  So basically tranching adds 10-20% overhead for the founders that could otherwise be spent on the product, marketing etc.
  3. Milestones change anyways:  At the early stage you often realize that what milestones you originally thought were important actually were the wrong milestones.   So you either have to renegotiate the milestones or the entrepreneur ends up targeting the wrong things just to get the money.
  4. Hurts VC-entrepreneur relations.  Specifically, it encourages the entrepreneur to “manage” the investors.    One of the great things about properly financed early stage startups is that everyone involved has the same incentives – to help the company succeed.  In good companies, the investors and entrepreneurs really do work as a team and share information completely and honestly.  When the deal is tranched, the entrepreneurs has a strong incentive to control the information that goes to the investors and make things appear rosy.  The VC in turn usually recognizes this and feels manipulated.  I’ve been on both sides of this and have felt its insidious effect.

There are better ways for investors to mitigate risk – e.g. lower the valuation, smaller round size.  But don’t tranche.

Next post: Ideal first round funding terms
Previous post: Why seed investors don’t like convertible notes

Views expressed in “content” (including posts, podcasts, videos) linked on this website or posted in social media and other platforms (collectively, “content distribution outlets”) are my own and are not the views of AH Capital Management, L.L.C. (“a16z”) or its respective affiliates. AH Capital Management is an investment adviser registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Registration as an investment adviser does not imply any special skill or training. The posts are not directed to any investors or potential investors, and do not constitute an offer to sell -- or a solicitation of an offer to buy -- any securities, and may not be used or relied upon in evaluating the merits of any investment.

The content should not be construed as or relied upon in any manner as investment, legal, tax, or other advice. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others. Any charts provided here are for informational purposes only, and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Certain information contained in here has been obtained from third-party sources. While taken from sources believed to be reliable, I have not independently verified such information and makes no representations about the enduring accuracy of the information or its appropriateness for a given situation. The content speaks only as of the date indicated.

Under no circumstances should any posts or other information provided on this website -- or on associated content distribution outlets -- be construed as an offer soliciting the purchase or sale of any security or interest in any pooled investment vehicle sponsored, discussed, or mentioned by a16z personnel. Nor should it be construed as an offer to provide investment advisory services; an offer to invest in an a16z-managed pooled investment vehicle will be made separately and only by means of the confidential offering documents of the specific pooled investment vehicles -- which should be read in their entirety, and only to those who, among other requirements, meet certain qualifications under federal securities laws. Such investors, defined as accredited investors and qualified purchasers, are generally deemed capable of evaluating the merits and risks of prospective investments and financial matters. There can be no assurances that a16z’s investment objectives will be achieved or investment strategies will be successful. Any investment in a vehicle managed by a16z involves a high degree of risk including the risk that the entire amount invested is lost. Any investments or portfolio companies mentioned, referred to, or described are not representative of all investments in vehicles managed by a16z and there can be no assurance that the investments will be profitable or that other investments made in the future will have similar characteristics or results. A list of investments made by funds managed by a16z is available at Excluded from this list are investments for which the issuer has not provided permission for a16z to disclose publicly as well as unannounced investments in publicly traded digital assets. Past results of Andreessen Horowitz’s investments, pooled investment vehicles, or investment strategies are not necessarily indicative of future results. Please see for additional important information.