Naming your startup


The Name Inspector has a good post today regarding 6 naming myths to ignore. I think it’s generally right on.   Naming is so important and so incredibly hard, especially for consumer internet companies that not only have to find a good name but also get the URL.   I am convinced that a big part of Twitter’s success, for example, is it has such a great name.  Simple word, easy to spell, great imagery, and also evocative of what the product does without being overly literal.

I have been involved in naming a number of startups, including my two most recent companies:  Hunch and SiteAdvisor.  Each time it was a long and painful process.  Here are some things I’ve learned along the way.

  1. Probably the most important thing is that the name be easy to spell after someone hears it pronounced.  I was involved in one startup before where every time you said the name the person says “what?” and then you have to spell it.  Trust me, it becomes really tedious and also adds friction to word-of-mouth buzz.
  2. You should have different naming goals for different products.  For example, SiteAdvisor was a security product.  You really can’t make security “cool” so we didn’t even try to bother to do that with the name.  Instead we went for a name that helped explain in a very literal way what the product did.  Before we came up with the name SiteAdvisor, I probably had 100 meetings where people said “I don’t understand what you are building – is it an anti-phishing toolbar, a spyware blocker or what?”.   This included meetings with VC’s who focus on security and other experts.  I knew the name SiteAdvisor was a winner when my father in law wrote the name on a high school blackboard and asked the kids what they thought the company did and one kid said “They advise you about websites” (and then he said ” … or construction sites” :) ).   Also we liked the name because we imagined in the future doing more than just security – for example warning about adult content.  (Alas, we never got that far).
  3. I tend to disagree with The Name Inspector about name length.  Shorter is definitely better.  In particular the number of syllables is important.  SiteAdvisor, while good at describing the product, is really clunky to pronounce.   I also tend to really dislike Latin-y portmanteau names like “Integra” “Omnitrust” etc.  Sounds like a pharmaceutical product.
  4. A few things I’ve learned about methodology.  I think it’s very rare to have an epiphany where you come up with a great name.  First of all, even if you do, the domain is probably taken and too expensive.  For systematically brainstorming, I really like the Related Words function on RhymeZone.  I try to make lists of words that are sort of related to the product and then look at all the related words, look at all those words’ related words, etc, making lists of words and word fragments that sounds good.  Then I have a systematic process for checking domains to see if they are buyable.  If you are super lucky (and picked a multiword domain name) you might get it retail, but at this point almost all .com names (yes, I think you still need to own the .com) are owned by someone and the question becomes whether they will sell it at a reasonable price.  The best case is usually that it’s owned by a professional domainer and it’s not very monetizable via Adsense (domainers make a lot of money from Adsense on sites like so you’d need to offer them a tons of money to sell it).

Naming is tough!

Next post: Founder vesting

Views expressed in “content” (including posts, podcasts, videos) linked on this website or posted in social media and other platforms (collectively, “content distribution outlets”) are my own and are not the views of AH Capital Management, L.L.C. (“a16z”) or its respective affiliates. AH Capital Management is an investment adviser registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Registration as an investment adviser does not imply any special skill or training. The posts are not directed to any investors or potential investors, and do not constitute an offer to sell -- or a solicitation of an offer to buy -- any securities, and may not be used or relied upon in evaluating the merits of any investment.

The content should not be construed as or relied upon in any manner as investment, legal, tax, or other advice. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others. Any charts provided here are for informational purposes only, and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Certain information contained in here has been obtained from third-party sources. While taken from sources believed to be reliable, I have not independently verified such information and makes no representations about the enduring accuracy of the information or its appropriateness for a given situation. The content speaks only as of the date indicated.

Under no circumstances should any posts or other information provided on this website -- or on associated content distribution outlets -- be construed as an offer soliciting the purchase or sale of any security or interest in any pooled investment vehicle sponsored, discussed, or mentioned by a16z personnel. Nor should it be construed as an offer to provide investment advisory services; an offer to invest in an a16z-managed pooled investment vehicle will be made separately and only by means of the confidential offering documents of the specific pooled investment vehicles -- which should be read in their entirety, and only to those who, among other requirements, meet certain qualifications under federal securities laws. Such investors, defined as accredited investors and qualified purchasers, are generally deemed capable of evaluating the merits and risks of prospective investments and financial matters. There can be no assurances that a16z’s investment objectives will be achieved or investment strategies will be successful. Any investment in a vehicle managed by a16z involves a high degree of risk including the risk that the entire amount invested is lost. Any investments or portfolio companies mentioned, referred to, or described are not representative of all investments in vehicles managed by a16z and there can be no assurance that the investments will be profitable or that other investments made in the future will have similar characteristics or results. A list of investments made by funds managed by a16z is available at Excluded from this list are investments for which the issuer has not provided permission for a16z to disclose publicly as well as unannounced investments in publicly traded digital assets. Past results of Andreessen Horowitz’s investments, pooled investment vehicles, or investment strategies are not necessarily indicative of future results. Please see for additional important information.